Pew Pew vs AMA

so its all about the money you make? no wonder this world is going to the ****s.

so much talk, so lil (in fact i think 0) action...

Show me the money! :P lol gerg

AT least there is the forum to keep busy when there's not much going on in-game!

AMA Secret Goal: longest non-combat thread age 60 or more.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Korp

But he didnt call it his kd, thats perfectly fine as I pointed out in my previous post it was mostly about semantics. He said his "own" kd implying that he was some kind of part in the creation of said kd. Oh if you knew Proteus you wouldnt defend him, hes a obnoxious player with a huge ego. Even pre-Rage it just got worse after that.

---

Well my "own" kd is Divinity, you have to look at context and i can use that term because again I'd be unlikely to care as much about any other kd, i feel like i was part of the kd as it built up its recent incarnation. If i'd join another kd i'd be more of "that leader" not just another player "in charge" (see AMA is Elits kd even if Proteus was given "control"). But i was neither the leader when my kd was operating at its best nor even a member at its creation. However,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

Thanks for the objectivity this is rare in the game this day and age especially in forum politics.

---

i get where where this coming from even if Proteus wasn't the "guy" that defined Rage. For my own kd i'd place myself at #5 as far as "leaders" and "owners" of the kd, and maybe not even in to 10 as far as prov management goes. Doesnt change how i feel and if your going to belittle Proteus theres so many better things to go after than his feelings about rage.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

As for how pewpew plays this game ... they haven't even done well (in terms of being able to beat really good kds - they lost to them and didnt chart in land or nw).

---

They have done very well. If you go all the way back through their incarnation of insolence they may have a losing WW record but they consistently stomp even very good "war" kds and most of their losses can either be placed on fights that were never evenly matched or against some of the best kds in the game. Very few of those losses were ones they should have one but just weren't good enough to do.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

Persian I am sure you could recall there was one age where pewpew told you you weren't allowed to do anything but fight them b2b2b because they were so butthurt ablut losing to divinity. They then hit your cows into real war because you did massive networth drop to war a ghetto.

---

Heck when they war-ed my kd the loss was about as textbook an example of fighting a kd with UB's as you can get, sure they didnt try anything "new" but they setup for a rematch they'd likely have won if we hadn't dodged. Our dodge made war #2 very evenly matched and we were just better at the time. But its not like B2B2B2... wars are uncommmon. In the past 4-5 ages alone BB did it Rage & SPGC; PewPew did it Us, ED, SPGC, Simians; Elit tried to do it to sanc. None of those were mean spirited like the Rusty V notBob fights going on right now. And its not like some rage hits every age dont happen, see numerous GB's on cows over the past few ages, the murder of Mercy when they fought TFC, what eventually disbanded Sanc. Not all that stuff goes punished and while infuriating when they happen "drama" is good for the game How do you think the game would play out if every age all the top kds acted just like say Freakstyle, and the "top wars" mirriored the friendly war tier. Kds would silently win wars, not talk much outside their own kd, just 1v1 untill its obvious you cant beat them anymore. People would get bored with that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Proteus

Also for the record i never claimed to be the best and named plenty of people who I thought were better kd leaders, I just said who I think is not good which was based on interactions with said persons' kingdoms or playing with said persons.

---

Oh really, Proteus? Don't seem to remember ever playing with you, nor chatted with you, so why all the flame on me and my KD? Yet I seem to recall your opening phrase to me on IRC was "big n00b, who are you going to farmout to this age?". Obviously I decided to not reply to your PM as I have got better things to do with my time than to QQ with you in IRC. Show some basic courtesy, and maybe sometime in future, you will get some. :)

Why don't you simply look back and reflect on the past 2-3 ages and figure out how relations between you and Pew has gone down the drain, and why they have accumulated so much hatred on you guys?

Everyone can see you are just trying to speech your way into Pew giving you the button prematurely into fort, which they are not obliged to. Sit back, relax and enjoy the conflict, and take all the QQ here with a pinch of salt. I am fairly sure you will have the button in time to come, so why the hurry.

Elit joked that he was gonna wave other targets if Pew doesnt engage within 2h of AMA's OOW. If we were the intended recipients of the wave, I would have welcomed it hitting into our fort.

Get real, you think we're farms, try it. We didn't 2 v 1 you, period. I still have that bit of respect for Elit and co to not do so.

Look at it this way: If you were to carry on your conflict with Pew, we would respect the hostile, and stay out of it.
On the other hand: If you think Pew is being a j*ck@ss dragging button giving into fort and consuming your time while "claiming" you, then by all means you could have given button to us when we were fort too. We would loved to have seen how that plays out. How Pew responds to it, is out of my control though.

The way I see it, you have 2 options, (A) A good clean fight that's going to be well-thought and executed by both sides, with a lot to play for at stake (be it land, settling your differences once and for all, whatever), or (B) go ahead and try us, and we see how that turns out with all the uncertainties here.

Looks to me like an easy decision that a 3 year old can make, much less an Advanced Degree holder like yourself.

"Get real, you think we're farms, try it. We didn't 2 v 1 you, period. I still have that bit of respect for Elit and co to not do so"

Wow elit getting special treatment from Pyro, i never seen them mind making it 2vs1 before, that must be a new one.

It's rather obvious if we wave Pyro, Pew will wave us next tick. That's why this thread was created, so we don't wave any1 else in top10. Good old absalom-like powerplaying ;)

hehe, well ama and bb wasent shy of using there powerplay mucels either ;)

Tho i admit now days with fractions of 3 and 2 and 3 ?, it becomes hard to be a lone kingdom, but just like we turned down the "alliances" before this age i hope others will do in the future makes for a more interesting game.

Can't stay clean if u spend so much time in top10, Mike ;)

true, we aint clean either as you remember poor ED.

Don Proteus, what product do you prefer for cleaning toilets? Clorox or Lysol?

he may answer you later when he gets home and can look at his toothbrush.

Keeping ama doing nothing costs them pool acres due to decay. It's a winning scenario that costs acres over time

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ovenmitt

Keeping ama doing nothing costs them pool acres due to decay. It's a winning scenario that costs acres over time

---

Pool mater only if you plan to explore. Im sure we will get more wars this age from all rest kds in top.
My only worry is ppl can say "AMA bashed top 10 for get easy WWs" :(