-wsk- vs CR round 2 ? 3 ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta

I personally love Binar in any form past and present, rven the future! Nom nom nom binbinbin <3

On the CR issue, its quite clear.

They raze into war knowing it was ****play and hoping to get away with it.

Then a group is formed to police them so suddenly 2 days later they fabricate this story and defend it tooth and nail (a consistent lie might become truth is u repeat it often enough).

Sparta doesnt accept any form of fake news other than that produced by Sparta itself.

---

What fabricated story?

The majority of LS favored hitting into war, with the reasons I've laid out here being the reasons they argued at the time.

Based on the logs I've seen from coss, topsy, -cRs-, and dubai, it is clear to me that there was an agreement that the winner of the war was going to be farmed land.

All that looks up in the air is what the meaning of 'winner' is, with WSK saying winner means who has a better chance against emeriti, and LS here saying the literal war winner.

You can agree or disagree with the reasoning for hitting into the war, but it's not fake news.

A fabricated story is more like when Spartans claims to want to LD out of the top to go back to the warring tier to dodge a notice, only to never actually do so.

Or when Spartans dealbreaks to take land, only to offer it back as bait to try and be given a button to hit.

And then tries the same lie about offering land back a week later.

Meep I think you would have a lot of fun playing with us for an age. LMK what you think. We can troll Bazinga in Whatsap together. :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

What fabricated story?

The majority of LS favored hitting into war, with the reasons I've laid out here being the reasons they argued at the time.

Based on the logs I've seen from coss, topsy, -cRs-, and dubai, it is clear to me that there was an agreement that the winner of the war was going to be farmed land.

All that looks up in the air is what the meaning of 'winner' is, with WSK saying winner means who has a better chance against emeriti, and LS here saying the literal war winner.

You can agree or disagree with the reasoning for hitting into the war, but it's not fake news.

A fabricated story is more like when Spartans claims to want to LD out of the top to go back to the warring tier to dodge a notice, only to never actually do so.

Or when Spartans dealbreaks to take land, only to offer it back as bait to try and be given a button to hit.

And then tries the same lie about offering land back a week later.

---

https://cdn.meme.am/cache/instances/...1/67934671.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

What fabricated story?

The majority of LS favored hitting into war, with the reasons I've laid out here being the reasons they argued at the time.

Based on the logs I've seen from coss, topsy, -cRs-, and dubai, it is clear to me that there was an agreement that the winner of the war was going to be farmed land.

All that looks up in the air is what the meaning of 'winner' is, with WSK saying winner means who has a better chance against emeriti, and LS here saying the literal war winner.

You can agree or disagree with the reasoning for hitting into the war, but it's not fake news.

A fabricated story is more like when Spartans claims to want to LD out of the top to go back to the warring tier to dodge a notice, only to never actually do so.

Or when Spartans dealbreaks to take land, only to offer it back as bait to try and be given a button to hit.

And then tries the same lie about offering land back a week later.

---

I'd put my bet on this being correct.

Meep that with Sparta isn't a fabricated story..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Korp

Meep that with Sparta isn't a fabricated story..

---

Or rather, Bart's explanations of those things are fabrications.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

Or rather, Bart's explanations of those things are fabrications.

---

Sometimes we change our mind!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

Or rather, Bart's explanations of those things are fabrications.

---

That is how I understood your post; thanks for making that clear in light of Korp's post.

Boy that was an adventure scanning through that stuff :p

We have this Bazinga guy talking about Meep running all 3 cows lol. I know it's common practice for Romanian and Phillipino to run 5-10 provinces so I can see why he would say something like this :) assuming he's Eastern European ofc. CR could probably use one or 2 roros to reduce the sitting credits required and allow a break for some players.

Spartans hitting Cr are simple it's very similar to the age AMA got gang banged and pyro hit AMA for TM's instead of razes like all of the other kingdoms that were hitting AMA ==> self gain and to try to untarnish the tarnished reputations and there's also an additional reason Bart lives in his own world and does not like it when everyone else's world does not have him in it or how would he get any attention?

I find it funny that WSK would try to threaten CR for future ages when WSK will probably be the ones trying for war crowns N such. A thread isn't good until it his 100 posts , bump.

maybe having meep and cRs doing diplo with each other isn't the smartest idea given that they hate each other.
I bet if each kingdom picked someone with a bit less anger they could come up with a better plan than what has been laid out so far. If there was a trash talk meter those two would have maxed it by now

Nah I dont hate meep... as much as I try cant get that low. As for threads for next age.. its actually CR doing them lol. They b2b2b us last age from 2x size, they razed into our war this age and hey look meep is all out here threading us for next age :)
We just thread them to pay theyr own card this age... not cuz they really worth our attention but they really left nothing else for us to do...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crazy Pete

We have this Bazinga guy talking about Meep running all 3 cows lol. I know it's common practice for Romanian and Phillipino to run 5-10 provinces so I can see why he would say something like this :) assuming he's Eastern European ofc.

---

I attribute this to the fact Eastern Europe actually knows how to pull it off without burning something.

This is the NA version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiY_iKSpWLM

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MyNameIsMatija

I attribute this to the fact Eastern Europe actually knows how to pull it off without burning something.

---

I think I've had more pinoy multis over the years than eastern euro multis. So many people whose brother or best friend happens to play and one of them just happens to need to be sat by the other one every conflict

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meep

I think I've had more pinoy multis over the years than eastern euro multis. So many people whose brother or best friend happens to play and one of them just happens to need to be sat by the other one every conflict

---

I played with Octobrev(s).

My Raging Clue is hunting for a war leader, so if anyone gets too upset with top diplo and is a severe warring badass... ;) come down here. It's nicer than up there.