Ok, I'm ready now - just got my TDs in. Who am I hitting?
Printable View
Ok, I'm ready now - just got my TDs in. Who am I hitting?
Once they started chaining Coss it was over :P
Why are we entertaining anything that Bart or Matija says. Any post by them should just be skipped overall.
few question nesta....
1.why would they'd need to raze. With easier op and better science (even if not x4-5) shouldnt they of been able to tornado your provs pre wave to remove things like wt/gs?
--this seems like an easy use of runes/mana that sage could easily leverage over your avain/undead
2. Did they really hit you trying to chain and using -hours instead of just eating worse attack times and mixing in max gains?
---If they did this, this litteraly alone could of cost them the war...i mean i've seen it tried, its always better to just outlast the avains and be outchained a bit early
3. What advantage would TD have done if their BE was as bad as u said....wouldnt the lack of build space and terrible BE just meant that they'd of had even worse luck using things like rax?
Intentionally farming out is common now days thanks to PewPew bring it and old devs did noting. Probably Korp can count how many times i told its already :P
TBH i don't think Coss will farm out intentional when he is on one from TOP spots? Most like he was not in his best shape (RL duties) for lead war. Every one have his good and bad wars.
1. humans 50% runes cost + running almost 0 towers. Sure they started like 16m runes or so, but LS + RT.
Raze was for WT's as they had no rogues to GA
2. Yes @ -ve hours, but gains began to suck heavily vs avians
3. Had they better time there swaps, BE would've been 100 + as we declare, less losses was there big downfall, we ran close to 20% wt's
Just only cause im drinking. they were loosing on NW much harder than us, land wise was in our favor with each wave.
And fyi since you're a master of farmouts, this wasnt a farmout, and if if was it was, it was a pretty pathetic one with just a WW bonus.
Maybe go back into your hole and hide?
Kind of what arcticdemon did, yes.
there where you're wrong. I stay off forum cause of nubs like you and bart. But hey atleast it is entertaining to read to get a good laugh when you both are involved.
and honestly, you two nubs should stop speculating as too why sleepy wd as you both ( bart) have shown on several instances including this your general lack of knowledge and simply inflated ego. Makes me feel sad for Proteus and wonder now if I should befriend him now..
You did in fact come here and express my posts should be ignored, then you say you are well entertained by them, you are contradicting yourself by even responding here. Just look how quick it was to begin with. Why you care about me, I don't even play in Sparta or anything, just minding my business trying to lead some random ghetto and I post here for random fun. We might get this ritual up on time, maybe not, depends if more than 4 people try casting it in the 48 ticks window. Have a good one.
er...with their science i'd of assumed rune cost and -wpa get negated, and stealth for rune stealing can litteraly be one of the most important ops u do in war. i mean its not like it takes 500k runes to nado someone down, and if it saves a raze thats a huge bonus for the 20-30 stealing ops u are diverting from ns. WT arent THAT strong that they protect runes.
#2...honestly if they really did -hours that probubly single handedly cost them the war. increased offensive losses for lower gains completely negates and long term war prospects.
#3 low be isnt devastating as its inevitable its why td lowring tpa losses 10-20% max isnt going to help on a war changing strategy since its only for 1 opening war ns run(in most wars)...and as bounce said u dilute or release anyway. probably coulda gotten away with just losing the tpa if they'd kept homes/towers so they still had magic :|
Then again if im reading it right i see 0 towers, 20% rax in builds....seems differnt than i'd of run....everyone needs towers, and doesnt need rax if u're going full attacker kd :P
Yes it should be ignored, as in dont reply to you, which i dont know why I'm now.. but it is entertaining to read
and you would always be dubbed as a super noob in uto and life
and so what if you dont play in sparta, players like you make the game sad yet entertaining, and im sure you would farm out to sparta if you can..js
bounce and sagebro2.... stop feeding the trolls. ...
persian, check WA :D
science wise ,they were generally around 100% production, but it matters not if you got no towers. and they also got a -15% spell success, so even still there modded is drop. Makes nado's more difficult
2. that plus we casting BL, with emeral..made quad taps easy
3. It would've helped early on , means saved razed. and even still as it diluted they would've had more op power for longer. 1-2 waves more of ns could change the tide
no towers cost them, but also fyi there calc rwpa wasnt that great either, meaning on par with us. so again Nado's as you suggested would've been unlikely
Lol arctic be happy I started something here. A top war and no one even posted stuff. Hell, I hardly support everything I said but sometimes you gotta start at a point where it starts a discussion.
Without me or Matija posting this forum is dead and boring. Reading the comments, it does seem sleepy majorly ****ed up. Should've at least included 3-4 rogues to do the GA WTs in their set-up too.
Witty comeback!
1. Again, they dont have such a huge science lead over us. They had like 250, and we had like 185 on avians. 2% more BE, 4% more pop, 1.5% more ME, <10% more magic/crime sci. Not insurmountable, especially given human's race penalty on -WPA and +rune cost.
Boom's SOS (4days old):
Income: 0% Tools: 29.3% Housing: 24.6% Prod: 143% Military: 22% Thief: 145.9% Magic: 141.7%
Mine (didn't change much except I removed novice scientists to income now):
Income: 4.6% Tools: 27.5% Housing: 20.3% Prod: 55.9% Military: 20.5% Thief: 134.2% Magic: 133.9%
Tornado wasn't really an option because we LS'ed all runes and we ourselves were pretty active rune users, so stock in KD was very low. Avians with MP GP M.Shield FL NB BL FANA. They stocked a lot of runes and went 0% towers, which was a surprise they didn't utilise the 140% production science better. They did something like this from what I can retrieve from bot:
Homes: 0% Farms: 5% Mills: 0% Banks: 0% TG: 14% Arms: 0% TB: -421k
Racks: 20% Forts: 0% GS: 17.9% Hosps: 19.8% Guilds: 7% Twers: 0% Hit: Sev
TD: 0% WT: 0% Labs: 0% Univ: 0% Stbles: 15.3% Dung: 1% Exploring: 0
Couple that with us doing Sabo Wiz before every chain, the chained with boosted WPA didnt really have much mana to spare, whatever he had was literally LLing for his dear life. And we did 2 chains on most chains b2b (chaining him, he gets home, sends out, we drop him further right away with our smalls), meaning for almost a good 24h they had to use mana for LL only.
This, and us killing 2 faeries to 2500a meant their only self-rune production were killed.
Raze wasnt that great for them too if they were to do it on avian. We were more like 2x-ing (sometimes 3 if we got to plan real well with kills and stuff, and I thought we did that decent) each other at equal size start of fight. Most their extra pop went to tpa so MPA was similar (they went 6 vs our 4 like I said). Only on undead they could kinda do it and still have enough off to get decent incoming. We on the other hand had the freedom of choice that if a target left a defense convenient for us to throw a spare raze and we can still get decent incoming we would do it and leave our rogues to do other things like AW for LL farm, otherwise when chaining a tricky target where nobody could get decent incoming if he had to do 1 raze, we would turn to our rogues doing GA.
2. They only minus h for opening wave. Apologies if I didnt make that clear. Nothing wrong with that imo, I would have done exactly the same thing if I were giving button to 10 avian 10 undeads.
As for sustenance, why would you think avians are poorer than humans? Especially when we have clerics, and sages on CF drop with 120% BE hosp. Avians racial and personality advantages were BE and build independent (-25% attack time, fana BL which gives like 15% extra OME at literally no penalty if timed well to expire before their turn to wave which was what we did. and -35% losses for cleric). Humans however were over-reliant on builds. They have literally no bonus from race that's useful for war and instead, a bunch of penalties. Having to hit into and be hit with emerald both ways I dont see how humans out-last avians.
3. See (1) for their sample build. At 70% BE plus diminishing returns I would have gone a bit more rainbow, with TDs in. Could also have been more careful with the TPA sent management for more sustain. At 70% BE 10% TD would have given 25.2% less losses and 18.9% bonus TPA. Which probably leads to something like 10-15% more success rates (10-15% less fails), and in total like 32-35% less losses? Keep in mind these numbers stack over time. The more you succeed and lose less thieves, the lesser you fail in future ops and lose less. I wouldnt call that insignificant.
"Man" was the natural flow of what I wrote, corrected it to "dude" because that's what he kept saying. Then I looked it up and it actually was "man" :D
excuses...excuses/// excuses....Its a FW
& for the records, Coss & co, dont suck. They just ran out of luck