metallica
Quote:
there is nothing wrong about what you just said, but the fact is, even though we have bigger problems than terrorism, we still don't have a solution for it.
you dont really have a solution for terrorism either it seems. And quite frankly, if you dont have a solution you get one. Its about priorities, nothing more.
neder
the quote seems very accurate as is, its quite open for interpretation.
Quote:
You're right, people in these regions don't hate eachother. They hate the americans and the brittish.
quite honesltly the majority of these people dont really give a **** about brits or americans, they have other concerns in life. Of course the invasion of iraq and afghanistan with all its mistakes will get you some negative attention, but that has very little to do with the general situation. I think you should watch the news less and get some less biased information about the attitutudes of prople in the middle east (and the rest of the world)
Quote:
Everything was still in the wallet and he refused a finders fee. What western city could this happen in?
Well, id like to think most of them. Europe hasnt gone that bad at least. Yes, cultures and attitudes are slightly different, but in the end most people around the world are loving caring respectful individuals that like doing the right thing.
Quote:
He would be right, he never promised anything, he left it in the hands of god and this is a permittable excuse in Saudi Arabia.
I think alot of people in the west can speak of stories just like it. As the one above its hardly something distinct to these regions imo.
Quote:
Almost all the money have gone back to the US
and investing the same money on American soil wouldnt have achieved more for the country? Either way you look on it its money spent on a war that couldve been spent elsewhere.
Quote:
You say 1.4B people live on $1.25 per day or less, but you can't live on this amount in america
Obviously, but thats beyond the point. My argument was that if even a third of the money would be spent towards actually stabilizing the world (by giving more people access to water etc.) youd end up with better results for less money. And you know what? This money too could be paid to american workers, companies and the likes. Its not so much the money invested in the war thats the problem, its what the money couldve been invested for otherwise - nationionally and/or internationally.
Quote:
How many people would be disconnected from the watersystem in the US if they were not in a war against terror?
Well, the current politics in many regions seem to favor the situation since its a step towards privatiziation. So its hard to really answer that question. If less money were dumped in to the war there would obviously be enough money to ensure that people could afford running water though, but if its not the goal it matters little. In the end its all politics.
(And AFKain its hardly only relevant regarding Saddam.)