Printable View
You know why bombdickie didnt dare to show the date? because it is completely made up.
That could just be his own message to himself on two cellphones. It dont prove where the message originated from and fro what cellphone number and who the receipient of the message was.
Even under the law such vague and unsupported evidence is inadmissible.
This goes to show bombdickie is wiling to cook up anything just to throw mud on Emeriti. Do you still want to believe his lies?
Spin more lies BombDICKIE.
I'm really happy someone from our kd (outsiders) posted the dragon info. Goes to show one thing: neither pyro or outsiders funneled any money during our war. Now if we can get all this BS propaganda to stop, so the whole server ca realize the absolute truth about what is happening here, that would be great. Outsiders beat pyro fair and square (pyro WD with an acre lead they could not maintain cod they sent the sapphire). Since then, pyro and BB doubled teamed emeriti, and we jumped in to help them out. Any kd in utopia that was unfairly double teamed would like to think that basic ethics would mean other honorable kds would even the odds. That's what we have done. Since then we have now bee doubled teamed by pyros mates. No compaints on our end about that. We will fight both kingdoms head on.
A full human kingdom that has ToG is able to afford 4 dragons. We had 2x peasant lead and full tog kingdom, how did you afford 4 dragons? None of you have answered this question yet. How did you keep up with a kingdom where 18 province can tree of gold and not only does your kingdom NOT have that, but had half the peasants.Quote:
Originally Posted by ThRaZe
You've really hit the absolute truth there. So unfair.... LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by ThRaZe
Can someone answer this (or theoretically. I'm very interested on the strat to do this.)?Quote:
Originally Posted by bombdigie
we have 7 ToG'rs, this is a yr0 war so barely any runes to greed us, no riots. we were 50% wages through the whole thing. Now, please explain where you got the gold for 4 dragons, BB feed you?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kappa_
The conflict with Pyro lasted 4 days..
I was an early age war. Early age wars, PPA is higher, and NWPA is lower.
This makes dragon funding a lot quicker in both directions - cheaper dragons and more peasants on provinces then normal.
Pyro's setup obviously has more TOG, but the notion that we had less peasants when they had setup all but 2 of their faeries as hitters and .. just no. I'm not sure if they were on 50% of our peasants by the end - it may have been only 40% of our peasants or perhaps as high as 66% of our peasants.
Pyro most certainly didn't have a peasant lead, but they did have more TOG. Pretty easy to see how the dragons were even///
We had FBed their 2 offensiveless cows down to 1k peasants and we were chastity locking everything. We were getting 6 hour chastities with the elf bonus + high guilds early age... pretty easy to figure out who wont he peasant battle.
The reason Pyro got a dragon lead going was because we bottlenecked on runes at the start having dumped ops onto Pyro right after the dumped pool and went fort(aka nuking the peasants of the xplored provs to 1k and locking them with chast). It took us about a day into war to get the elves ops going again and once we did it the depopulation was on.
Pyro effective had 1 faery sage with good tpa, 1 faery rogue with good tpa, and not many other ops to speak of because the rest of the faerys were setup as hitters.
We had 6 Elf mystics setup as pure T/M...
And Bomb, I really hope you live in the US, because I will 100% sue you for libel.
There isn't any point asking Pyro where they got their dragon gold... I have no evidence to think they got funneled GC and I'm not a lying POS who makes **** up for propaganda purposes. Maybe they did but I don't know that for a fact... no point to stoop to Pyro's level.
Hmm...
I think Leo said it best:
So we all know you are an alliance now, I was extremely surprised at the ability for you to fund dragons, and then someone comes to us telling us (trolling us?) that you received gold from Emeriti. I guess at this point with regards to the gold I can see it happening and I can potentially see it not happening. But then I think to myself, why would it not happen? You guys are already an alliance and a real dirty one at that. I won't give you the benefit of the doubt, whether it happened or not.Quote:
(1) Is it not too much of a coincidence that the 2 kingdoms that warred BB and Pyro (as you said, growth kingdoms are easy to find) are the 2 that come to Emeriti's aid? (Plus, of course, the other kingdom that started it all). Is it right for the game if, in an alternate timeline, BB was trying to grow with a late-age set-up, lost their first war, and Emeriti saunters to the crown with their early acre lead? I didn't consider this initially, but sending loosely allied kingdoms out as hatchetman (later said to be Absalom's modus operandi to begin with) to delay competitors while being able to deny all responsibility seems to be at least shady (if "legal" within the loose utopia framework of what's acceptable and what's not). If the situation hadn't blown up, nobody would have realised that they are aligned with Emeriti.
TRUTH:
PYRO IS TRYING TO DISGUISE THEIR LOST TO OUTSIDERS BY FALSELY ALLEGING THAT OUTSIDERS HAD GC HELP FROM EMERITI.
Pyro is guilty for the very CRIME that they are alleging outsiders/emeriti to be doing, perhaps Pyro was the one that got GC help from BB and they assumed other kd STOOP so low to their level. NOOB!
Morder44 is absolutely right.
Man stop trying to find reasons to justify PYRO's lost man. You lost to a better kd. so just stfu and move along and stop trying to find conspiracy theory and find fault with Emeriti, BOMBDICKIE.
Well, Pyro and Outsiders should war again after this "AWAR".
I still don't believe in losses when you have net acre gain. We exited the war to explore, simple as that - Outsiders was jobbing for Emeriti and so would basically stay in war with us indefinitely to not allow us to explore. You are just very angry and what I'm doing is working on you, its almost too easy on you (for real).Quote:
Originally Posted by Pr0fanity
Emeriti went full sage and in order to get the lead it needed for a crown it sent its alliance dogs at the only remaining competition left in the game. There are only 3 of us now.
You all got caught red handed, and the game is now forever changed to that of alliances and alliance wars (at a much smaller scale then before).
So you do you live in the US? If you do I am going to pay the process server more to take a picture of your face when he hands you the paperwork. =)
LOL What? Okay, see you in small claims court I guess?Quote:
Originally Posted by mordon44
:) I'm a newbie who's just reading all these. Thanks for the info tho, very interesting read.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollopoint
Anyways, can anyone from BB answer his question?
Proof of malice, however, does allow a party defamed to sue for general damages for damage to reputation, while an inadvertent libel limits the damages to actual harm.Quote:
Originally Posted by bombdigie
Meaning you might be in for more then you bargained for, considering you have already admitted to Malice Point Blank. I would contact an attorney now and seek advice if I were you.