New Anticheat Measure Going Live Today

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bishop

How would they have the slightest idea of how our systems work? It works, the fact that you dislike it doesnt change this.

FYI, the people that did this system have credentials far in excess of some IT guy.

---

Um, so why do we still have a "Tick" still?

As far as to the how of the system's workings... I believe you mentioned Google being a powerful tool earlier. I'm sure it could be figured out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byakuya

Well how is this different from sitting shall I ask? You can PAY to SIT another province. You can PAY to play in the same kingdom. Why can you not PAY to play together? The point that you all miss is that it is too easy to cheat with today's technology any ways. Why not give honest players their bit? For example, I have two smart phones plus I go to a University (locations not permitted of course ;) and my computer. Math on that... Hmm I could create four accounts if I really wanted to, all with different IP's and I sincerely doubt that your little net would catch it if I did. So why not make money off the "cheaters" like you did with the sitters. You know why that was started and all; People circumventing the system. Lesson learned there, "cheaters will cheat, so let's make some money".

---

You can pay to play together- you get an invite. The point that you fail to grasp completely is that we are telling you this system is working as designed, but you chose to to ignore that. No one ever said it would catch every cheater, thats not the goal.

Lesson you need to learn, just because people can cheat doesn't mean you turn a blind eye to it.

Ticks have nothing to do with this system.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joker1975

And you guys from ZZ didn't cheat? 99.99% of all SKD's were cheating/breaking the rules. Off topic but just saying.

---

lol you sir miss read what I wrote - I was infact agreeing with one of your points about playing with friends.

http://blog.utopia-game.com/post/139...unexpected-and

Pay to Win Features :P
Nice touch. Can't say they have no humor :P

I wish I could read it. They're prolly funny :)

Insta-Kill
Level-5 Spells
Nuclear Orcs
Bribe Developers

For nub Palem who can't read:

Insta-Kill
Level-5 Spells
Nuclear Orcs
Bribe Developers

Looks like a fun place to work, lol.

EDIT: Damn I got ninja'd hard...

I guess you can click on the pictures to enlarge them...lol

@DHaran - pwnd

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bishop

You can pay to play together- you get an invite. The point that you fail to grasp completely is that we are telling you this system is working as designed, but you chose to to ignore that. No one ever said it would catch every cheater, thats not the goal.

Lesson you need to learn, just because people can cheat doesn't mean you turn a blind eye to it.

Ticks have nothing to do with this system.

---

Ticks had to do with it when you bragged about the supremacy of your ITs. Lesson I need to learn? It's part of life. Acting like every one cheats only keeps you from having friends.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byakuya

Acting like every one cheats....

---

The purpose of the system already disproves that statement. The whole idea behind this system is to free (to an extend) non cheaters (majority) of having to compete/deal with cheaters (minority).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byakuya

Ticks had to do with it when you bragged about the supremacy of your ITs. Lesson I need to learn? It's part of life. Acting like every one cheats only keeps you from having friends.

---

Ticks have nothing to do with the developers ability to code. Your analogy was weak and irrelevant. If you actually want to contribute to a discussion that's great, but if you just want to whine and waste my time I'll ignore you.

Okay maybe ticks don't deal with IT's but the devs themselves. Not giving you all enough creds :P

"The whole idea behind this system is to free (to an extend) non cheaters (majority) of having to compete/deal with cheaters (minority). " -Scavenger

I would rather deal with a few cheaters than wipe out the majority of non-cheaters.

Like I've said before, I would rather deal with a few cheaters than lose honest players.

This system is a way to do that.

That disagrees with your previous statement...