Because then they retal you instead of the person they are in war with and are forced to farm out to a competitor. For an example of this, see PewPew v SWEA 2013Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
Printable View
Because then they retal you instead of the person they are in war with and are forced to farm out to a competitor. For an example of this, see PewPew v SWEA 2013Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
It's not ok. Just a heads up for anyone else that would like to ask a question, if you intend on bending the rules then it wont be ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
PewPew only warring SWEA to avoid AMA and give SWEA the crown - 100% PewPew would never war SWEA if they wernt being farmed by AMA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Topsy
when ama attacked into debaucherys war..lots of provs wanted to start razing ama immediately however leadership was afraid of deletions for fake war so they just took the wave and ama gained acres ....im glad pew pew isnt letting ama get away with it 2x in one age....i think something should be changed so that kingdoms dont have to worry about getting deleted for fighting back...just make it impossible to hit into others war imo....
this is not a fake war... pew pew found a more suitable target when ama deal broke and started attacking ...ama interfered in to the war but arent getting free land this time..pew pew cant be faulted for retalling a kingdom that is actively hitting into their war...
seriously what does elit/ama want to just go around hitting into wars and have the enemy deleted if they retal...
but how can it be a war when 1kd is all in vacation mode ?
you mean like when PewPew found a suitable war target when removing EoA cf with strippers (and going to war) to help them avoid being farmed by AMA and in the process farm out strippers?Quote:
Originally Posted by Utopiannoob1
or like when PewPew removed another EoA cf and ran to war with SWEA to farm out so AMA would not crown?
justice me thinksQuote:
Originally Posted by wablam
anyway congrats to SWEA for land crown.
They are both in vac mode?Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
unless kingdom page is really outdate, i'd have to say no - only PewPewQuote:
Originally Posted by ReinS
both in vaca...but not ama..so they get to grow while others are stuck in protection...when they are the ones who started it all by deal breaking then hitting into war for the second time...seams unfair to me..ama should be put in vaca also if the others are
unfortunately AMA didn't break or bend any game rules - there's no punishment for being lame :(Quote:
Originally Posted by Utopiannoob1
So people can now hit into wars and people can not retal from war as it will be considered a "fake war".Quote:
Originally Posted by Bishop
I guess utopia really is dead.
PewPew waved Jerks while they were hostile with AMA - did we run to war to avoid PewPew who were 85k acres bigger? no we did not - PewPew must of realized it was slippery ground when they ran to war with SWEA and started farming out.Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
my only sadness in all this is SWEA get caught in the middle :(
Oh, is that what it is? I must have misunderstood what is happening, what with me being new and all.Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
seriously bishop people arent allowed to retal when someone hits into their war??