lol enemas.
Printable View
lol enemas.
Can some nab fill me in on how BoB vs Rusty is going? I'm busy at the moment. ..
Strat0?
Currently, Wsk have a mixture of t/mish looking dudes and heavy attackers in the mid nw range active. I'd imagine if it's not social hour that some zone metrics are being planned.
SS has the top contingent and a lone onlooker active which appears to indicate the initial resistance.
My guess is Wsk are going to try to take down SSs top attackers before they can grapple with their t/ms.
sn0re.
It has kicked off.
SS had armies out on hostile start date. WSK did a hefty wave including some 4x's on all home orcs. Expecting delayed hostile, all spells/ops blanketed by SS. Honour whoring to the last.
** Summary **
Total attacks made: 38 (9,031 acres)
-- Traditional march: 30 (9,031 acres)
-- Raze: 5 (0 acres)
-- Massacre: 2 (1,997 population)
-- Failed: 1 (2.6% failure)
-- Uniques: 14
Total attacks suffered: 11 (1,457 acres)
-- Traditional march: 1 (487 acres)
-- Ambush: 9 (970 acres)
-- Failed: 1 (9.1% failure)
-- Uniques: 1
wsk - They have: 88k acres | 18,141k nw | tpa+wpa+sci 3,790k nw | 305k peons | 1,665k units (+6k solds) | 911k income (0k TOG) | 2,101k wages | 5,391k gc | 2,557k runes | 3,984k foodQuote:
Originally Posted by crease
ss - They have: 78k acres | 16,218k nw | tpa+wpa+sci 4,013k nw | 164k peons | 1,382k units (+7k solds) | 513k income (116k TOG) | 1,758k wages | 13,787k gc | 4,769k runes | 4,060k food
seems like wsk has a large troops advantage going into this, quite excited to see how it plays out!
we had 0 armies out and you guys again reneged on the 1 term we agreed onQuote:
Originally Posted by crease
One second, are you actually saying that you had pre-agreed terms that they could wave you only with your armies out and they waved you with armies home?Quote:
Originally Posted by markers
The only term was, hostilities could start after a certain date. We waved two hours after this time.
No the term was hostile was 22nd - as in both kds relations = hostile. Once again you reneged, same thing you all did 2 ages agoQuote:
Originally Posted by Maximo
No they were supposed to drop forts 22 per terms and start hostile. They purposely delayed nearly 3 ticks and claim there was no terms. The message clearly states both kd hostile on 22ndQuote:
Originally Posted by lampost
can you show us the terms agreed on ingame pms?Quote:
Originally Posted by markers
He was saying the war summary didn't have a counter wave, "we had 0 armies out."
Also, wsk stayed in fort for over 2 hours past the agreed date, just my 2 cents.
Rusty nubs deserve no respect, xloggers
wingding better start razing them now. Guess you dont have balls. Or you dont deserve respect. Maybe you're just a nub and you only deserve to get farmed. Issue with "xloggers" is with sitting. Anri has tried this where he post on war forums on the sat account. Pretty sure other who sat other accounts have tried this.
Yes, please, I would like to see the messages between the monarchs as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN
Even if this was the case, you weren't hostile either? It's always amusing how diplomacy and conditions break down no matter what. Not blaming either side in this one, but seems its inevitable how there is going to be some controversy one way or another.
> The Wealthy King Sultan mishandling of Charity (SS) said: > > > > 24 abit too late for our Australian gangs. We would prefer a 22 latest.
yea confirmed it is for war but Lets conclude a fixed deal on jul 16 again. can taggy up alr wee
--------
> King Lol the Sorcerer of BiB way or No way (wSK) said: > > > > k so hostile starts march 24 YR 14. No need for silly terms, I agree on that term too :P
confirm?
----------
> The Wealthy King Sultan mishandling of Charity (SS) said: > > > > Lets put it march/apr yr14? > > > > U cool with that? They are all willing to land drop to war us. Haha. > > > > Lets conclude a fixed deal on jul 16 or so for actually hostility date. I guess we setting up a month just to let people know we have each other. Yea? We can have terms up by then if needed.(although i hate that arrangements)
--------
> > > >> King Lol the Sorcerer of BiB way or No way (wSk) said: > >> > >> > >> > >> yeah, we have ascension and fs asking us for war aswell all day long ;))
thats why I keep "pushing" it to set a date for hostile start...
----------
> The Wealthy King Sultan mishandling of Charity (SS) said: > >> > > >> > Good idea! Theres alot of urging and talk happening at game forum for us to war specific kds. > >> > > >> > > >> > http://forums.utopia-game.com/showth...de-Squad/page5 > >> > > >> > Ascension badly asking for war. > >> > Tsk..
----------------
> >> > > >> >> King Lol the Sorcerer of BiB way or No way (wSk) said: > >> >> > >> >>
ok so no terms.. but can we set a hostile starting date and have our kds tagged to war agreed to avoid vulturing?:P
> >> >> > >> >>
------------
> The Wealthy King Sultan mishandling of Charity (SS) said: > >> >> > > >> >> > Hey there. Sorry kinda bz and just back home from work. I actually dont like any terms kind haha. > >> >> > > >> >> > Actually i think the kd still need 4 5 days to war. Kinda damaged in this war as the opponent dragged it longer.
------------
>> >> King Lol the Sorcerer of BiB way or No way (wSk) said: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hey. So when can u be ready and what terms?
and I sent u a msg @3 days before the hostile starts asking you if we can agree on both kds to be out of fort... wich never got a reply. So pls dont blame us for ur bad diplo... and to tell u the truth we really thought u will play the forti card(seeing u entering fort 1.5 days after us) and force us to hit u trough fort.
Annyway, thats about it... enjoy the war and next time try to set ur war better instead of trolling forums all day..
ty
No big Deal, you still going to win...unless u choose to lead, perhaps outcome will change.Quote:
Originally Posted by markers
Since there are so many would be honor crown-ers looking to vulture the winner of this conflict i suggest you guys just play this out to the end of age unless you want your crowning potential to be vultured by those without enough of their own war driven honor yet have the military superiority to take yours.
None-the-less, good luck & fight the good fight, both in war and immediately after it.
more likely scenario is they wd up honour, Econ game is all but over already, and SS will never match WsK's UB countQuote:
Originally Posted by Feint
I'm my own person. I just feel like using uto forums now where in the past I didn't.Quote:
Originally Posted by Abscond
cRs told me to not raze you at all, we were going to mass you actually for the robbing...since we have long history w wsk, we respected their response to not give you an excuse to lose...Quote:
Originally Posted by Abscond
U are in luck... Must be marker and his buddy( copious) leading the war. Just like their only failed war against ascensionQuote:
Originally Posted by crease
I'd like to see the evidence from the other side, that there in fact was an agreement stating no hits with armies home.
Too true, FS has been hitting any kingdom that has honor that's smaller than them to try and crown. You guys should run to another war if you can, FS is coming for you. They came for us already and are picking on someone half their size. I wasn't sure about this whole occupy Utopia movement before, but what FS is doing now is uncool. Wish someone would teach them a lesson.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostfinger
This is utopia. Only top kingdoms have the say. Quit imhoQuote:
Originally Posted by nipster
Same thing ED did last age to win the honor crown.Quote:
Originally Posted by nipster
Not sure what you think is expected in an honour crown race.Quote:
Originally Posted by nipster
#1 Honour - we asked to war, they declined and ran to another war
#2 honour - Us
#3 honour - We asked to war, they declined, now have CF with them
#4 honour- We asked to war, they declined, ran to another war
#5 honour - CF'd
#6 honour - in war
#7 honour - No CF in place, with high honour provinces in our range. We send out hits to gain honour since no legit honour kingdoms are available to war now. This kd decides to retaliate in full instead of doing diplomacy to secure a CF. We obviously cant just walk away from a Hostile - Hostile conflict without diplomacy. We have no reason to start the diplomacy as we are in the advantageous position. Now this kingdom is crying bully instead of putting their time in trying to come up with a diplomatic solution to this.
We were perfectly fine going with a couple hits on high honour targets and securing CF. That should be expected of any kd in our position to do. There is a risk/reward of being a small kingdom all age and storing up large amounts of honour by warring and beating ghetto's. You get a larger amount of easier wars compared to honour kingdoms that also grow to be top 15 in size. Just because your kingdom has chosen a safer sized environment to do your warring in doesn't mean you are just given an easy road to be high or top of the honour charts, and it should be expected that you will be randomed into by larger kingdoms who are going for honour charts.
If you fully retaliate in return without CF/Diplo attempts, that is on you, you aren't some kind of lucky chosen. We randomed into several kingdoms, large and small with high honour provs that we didnt have CF's with. If you check our news, we accepted every CF proposal that has been offered to us within those kingdoms we hit. Your kingdom isn't any different. Don't yell bully if you don't understand diplomacy.
The warring tier only has themselves to blame when a kingdom is wise enough to grow past the rest and impose it's new found size advantage against those that chose to stay small.
I agree. I thinks what's missing is that Suicide Squad is situationally compromised to occupy the lower whoring rim: they don't have the diplomatic backup or background.Quote:
Originally Posted by Band of Horses
What I find peculiar is the whoring circle has let Feint slip in and be exactly where it hurts. Everybody seems shy when it's kind of his thing. Suicide Squad staggered here with a lot of unwelcome rhetoric. Feint has done what I figured you should do: aim for the top.
The giants are quiet, why? But Suicide Squad is different because of a crown? The priorities are not in order.
Good job to Feint. And I see he didn't even use diplo.
We attempted to get war with all possible high honor KDs in range. They said no. So now we are waving around (and yes, when u reach NW top 10 very most of targets will be in smaller KDs). And, well, i can somewhat agree that it doesnt feel very cool, but thing is... we dont have anything else to do and hibernating until EoA isnt an option.Quote:
Originally Posted by nipster
Yes, because sitting on our hands doing nothing and letting SS crown for free would make this awesome age that more interesting for everyone.
I play in Ascension. There is absolutely nothing wrong with FS's current tactics in fact it is their logical choice without a war option. Good luck
yeah lol... top 10 whores entire age for land and when a war kd whores for honor for a crown its just uncool.
You guys should realize that this is a game and everyone is "fighting" to win it..
To Strato,
It wasnt my intention to fight at the top.
Lol, I didnt realise how i Landed at the top as well...I started the age with only 18 players. and till mid age, finally stablise a group of 22. And the kingdom rule is to log in at least once a day. Anything more is a bonus to the kingdom. We fought many wars..there is win, there is lose. Facing opponent with more players or few mill bigger or high WW record, my crew are dauntless
We not afraid of the size difference. We just take whatever is coming. For those kingdoms which I rejected, maybe you approached me the wrong time.
We just took 2 in but they are still chilling till the new age. We will have many players leaving also. Because a relax age of 9 wars is too taxing. Anyone interested to join me, drop me a mail
We challenge the impossible!
How is the war going?
If i am not wrong I see attacker chain vs tm chain?
Pretty much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Over
Quote:
Originally Posted by Over
SS went for a nw split whereas WsK took from the top
I was under the impression that honor was for the honorable more so than for the strongest. Game guide gives that impression at least, s'pose thats just antiquated though. Ruthless looks to be fighting for thier honor without looking back akin to the way Feint describes himself. When the meter maxes that will be much less possible given the opponent though. Totally thier fault for believing that honor was ever thiers to begin with. A very prima nocta mentality exists. If all kds had 25 provinces some of this behaviour, imo, could be better accepted by those outside of the top 10.Quote:
Originally Posted by cRs