We had war egrement, spent bilion gold on prep and actully fought before cf'ing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus
The U lost hostile decesivly and asked for a way out of agreed war.
Nothing to complain about here.
Printable View
We had war egrement, spent bilion gold on prep and actully fought before cf'ing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus
The U lost hostile decesivly and asked for a way out of agreed war.
Nothing to complain about here.
Sad end to a conflict. Even sadder that the U doesn't want to war us. That completes the entire top #8 bar FS, whom we won't war for obvious reasons :P
Would you rather they war and FS get's a WW bonus worth 15k acres + science? I would think they end up much bigger than they are now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Proteus
Also, seems to be closer to 20%.
proteus literally has no idea what he is talking about.. he should really be grateful that it didnt go to war, or we would be like %10 bigger than emeriti as the result..
we took roughly %15 land + what they would give to emeriti if they wouldnt beat us.. for around 1 billion gc spent + a week of almost no sci etc, and we fought a hostility, which we won by a large margin so they didnt want to war (pretty bad for us i must say).. its pretty rich complaining coming from someone who taxed ppl whole age without any training at all, against us who fought all our way up here..
mind you all, emeriti has cf terms with everyone that ppl should give emeriti the same amount of acres if they give us acres for a cf.. oh well, im well aware that we have only marginal chances against emeriti bpa&wpa advantages, but it still amuses me to see their reactions to our growth and complaints over gains from actual fights..
Since I don't think anyone from the U has responded I'll put my two cents in here. We had about a day of a real hostile and it was quickly clear that our prep (and a few mistakes we made at the beginning) meant we had 0 chance of winning or even making it competitive. We could have warred and probably given up less land than we made a deal for but that likely would have ruined the chance of even a semi fair war between FS and Eme. With the prep time Eme has had FS probably still won't have much of a chance but o well.
Give us a little credit. I seriously doubt you would have taken more land in war than what we gave up. WW bonus would have been nice of course but I don't know if that makes up for the damage we would have done overall.Quote:
Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN
its not about not giving you credit, its just about how big ww bonus is at this point..Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealKremlin
I trust Francis to know what he's talking about (argh). The farm-out would've been pretty huge. He's just stating a fact here :P doesn't mean he doesn't give u credits Kremlin.
True, ww bonus is pretty nice at this point.Quote:
Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN
I think he was referring more to the bonus, we wouldnt have farmer out and im very confident we would have given up much less land. Now with the WW bonus FS might have been able to end up bigger, who knows.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bart of Sparta
Great job ignoring facts.Quote:
Originally Posted by LoRD_SaMPuaN
After your war with pandas your leadership messaged us and begged (literally, I have logs) for us not to notice and own you. We were nice and gave you a 4 week cf for only 10% of your land or 15k acres and you complained how expensive it was. Yet had we engaged you, you'd be farmed for 50% your land. However, we were very reasonable with every kingdom all age and never pushed anyone into an unwinable fight. We took 0 acres from the U and allowed this fight to take place, had we wanted we could have engaged them way before this fight was ever planned and could have owned you 3 weeks ago as well. Yet we've been reasonable with everyone.
Yes I'd actually prefer for people to war each other and actually earn their acres as opposed to just getting 40k acres for less than 24h of real hostile. I don't care if you gain another 20k, as far as I am concerned you are playing for second place since this age started, my problem is with people begging and pleading "oh please don't attack us, we'll give you land" and then "oh 10% is so much we can't compete anymore" to then taxing a kingdom for 25% their acres. How hypocritical. You say we taxed people? The most we took from any single kingdom this age was FS, and it was only 10% their acres and because they were the #2 kd at the time. Had we actually asked you for as much acres as we'd gain in a fight, well let's put it this way, you wouldn't have a kingdom anymore. You say we want to tax people? No not really, no wanted to war us all age, not even Y1-3 when everyone was almost even acres. The reason we got land for a cf was because no one wanted to be noticed and have to fight. Thought a kingdom as big as you would understand things better but then again anyone can place t5 nowadays considering the game is no longer competitive.
Your kingdom had two chances to war us this age, one was y3 at close to even acres but you guys proactively approached and offered us acres to not get farmed. You haven't really earned anything this age, the age would have been over weeks ago had we chosen not to be nice to you, which really you haven't even earned.
Looking at the post from Kremlin seems like the goal was to make it easier for FS to compete, wonder who these guys (FS) are that they need hand outs all the time and the need to play within an alliance with how tiny the game is now and everyone else is playing solo.
See you soon FS.
#payKuhan
Quote:
Originally Posted by citadela01
#FarmoutComigSoonToAPlaceNearYou
#BegforCFOrGetFarmed(Again)
Man it's great to be back, forgot why I liked playing so much, always fun to outplay and own nubs like you and then watch you cry. People have been asking me during the age if I am really back but I didn't have a good answer. Well now I know, and it's a MFing resounding "F yeah"
How do you mess up the John Wick quote so badlyQuote:
Originally Posted by Proteus