It is, SN seems to be one of the hardest intel ops to get (if not the hardest one). Should be 1% andeasy.Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
Printable View
It is, SN seems to be one of the hardest intel ops to get (if not the hardest one). Should be 1% andeasy.Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzzy|
Bump
Operation Swift Justice: Stage 3 :)
What's happened?
you need to change your operation name.
Operation Geriatric Justice.
Palems kingdom attacked and stole into our(Disturbed/malevolence) eow cf.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lestat
Why are you complaining about attacks into a hostile when you attack into war yourself Palem? You are escalating the problem instead of solving it.
Your actions means other kingdoms can now rightfully attack your kingdom while you are at war as well.
You're too far from the microphone; here, let me push your stool up.
With due respect, I understand you're late to the game. Indications from the AMA conflict you mention leadership MIA.Quote:
Originally Posted by Folle
Your kingdom struck and tilted what was already a serious challenge. Your kingdoms hits were strategic, purposefully or not, in favor of our enemies main weakness. I'm curious about hits that took place in concert with outside kingdoms that specifically targeted our advantage. The fact that Roozed in his recruit thread mentions the detail:
You do not know how many or few of us there are
You do not know how vast or minimal our preparations have been or will be
Absalom does not know the above information either
I don't think Roozed is dishonorable, nor you. But the system was in place to be exploited by players with no honor. MIA leadership is exactly all it takes. You are always welcome to #HRS to discuss this matter. We both know how it feels to be a toy now. Take care.
@ strat - you're clearly drunk. Go lay down :p
@ folle - your total lack of understanding surrounding both the idea of cause and effect as well as the general concept of punishment are actually more interesting than sad. Let me ask you, does the server have the right to 24/7 gb abs because they gb'ed debauchery?
I dont see what a gb on abs or debauchery has to do with a few attacks into a hostile kingdom has to do with one another.
As I told you, you are welcome to talk with me for a solution to the problem, but I will never accept you attacking into our war.
Attacking into hostile => attacking into eow cf => attacking into war => razekilling and ages ruined... its your call where it ends.
Actually that's your call as well.
However I think defending the actions of a couple loud mouthed douchebags hitting into active hostiles of kds less than half their size and then running their mouths about it there on after is a very bad side to take.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Folle
Its pretty simple, if you act like douchebags you will be treated as douchebags. Hitting douchebags is no crime at all.
i +1 his argument, i think its cheap and dirty to hit into active hostiles. glad to see hes doing something about it, unlike the rest of us "blowhards" (got a kick out of that)Quote:
Originally Posted by DHaran
-10% gains/losses when taking hits with an open hostile? any more than that probably gets into abuse territory
qft.Quote:
Originally Posted by korp
The attacks happened while I was away and now trying to solve this mess. I have offered them a fair compensation and apologized for the wrong my kd did. If they feel like taking it any further, we can always war. Open offer for that as well, though they refused to war.
We welcome any dance after the AMA one.
No offense towards Palem and co but it seems kind of lame to get payback by idling for days just so you can rob or hit into people's hostiles or eowcfs. Real revenge would be to pump and wave them. At present this seems like when someone doesn't invite you to their birthday party so you don't invite them to yours, just get back at them. It's a bit petty.