Godly, your sig made sense last age because you were the most recent crown holder; however, now the incumbents are BB. So you should change your sig until you win again!
Printable View
Godly, your sig made sense last age because you were the most recent crown holder; however, now the incumbents are BB. So you should change your sig until you win again!
Who are you, again?
The holder of the Godly icon will be the last legitimate crown winner. BB doesn't apply.
They're all legit.
You lost. It's ok.
No troll accounts please.
Are these your 4th and 5th multies Liar?
Seriously, it's sad.
He has dissociative identity disorder clearly.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
http://24.media.tumblr.com/41820ce2c...ic7yo4_250.gif
Lmfao, leave them Palem, they are comedic value...
If I leave them it's, it's incentive for him to keep making troll accounts. He's not posting anymore, and I'm deleting all of the posts from his original and multi accounts too. I'm not putting up with this retard.
But if you don't leave them, then you kinda look like you're talking to nobody..... again..... like back in the building with the happy place room...
Mods...
Sigh. All these childless people.
Telescopic lens it appears. I can faintly see the warning where it says objects may appear larger than they actually are.
Did the Grand Utopian Album hit 100 pics?
But Godly, that's exactly my point. I'm not an Institution like you are, but since I do have a crown, I could use the same sig as you since it's unclear which crown is being referred to. Which is why your sig only makes sense as the most recent crown holder, which you aren't anymore.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
Wait, is anyone who holds a crown allowed that as their sig?
So could i have it for my prov honour crown in Age 60 XD
That is EXACTLY the point my friend. By leaving his sig the way it is this age, he opens it up to the masses to start using it. Which I know is exactly what he doesn't want.
No, I agree with Godly here. I don't recognise the last prov who won the honour crown as a legitimate claim to my throne, therefore I am the last legitimate winner. ;)
Edit: Here's a suggestion, have a crown symbol next to the KD name if that KD crowned in the previous age, which can be switched on and off by the monarch. Like a badge of honour.
How cute, "the last one doesn't count!!!" ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
BB has the most legitimate one in the most recent 10 ages.
Most of the others are tainted in some way (farming/gb etc)
if gb/dealbreak/farmouts were part of the plan, I'd say that crown was legit. they still won. haven't people figured out that's all part of the game?
ReQi is the legit honor crown winner recognized by noobium as a shinning example of pews greatness.Quote:
Originally Posted by LivingDead
It's not part of the game by design, which is why it is frowned upon. I've always hated the idea of having "clans" of different kingdoms that work together to control the top. Creating a monopoly is a terrible thing to do, be it with a company in real life, or a group of kingdoms in a game. It detracts from the spirit of the game and creates a less enjoyable environment for everyone else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karazy
The answer is counter escalation. Like players should spend some time finding each other and either ally by kingdom or insurgence. If the tops don't mind I don't mind. I think it'd be fun. It takes a worm to give a bully power. I also think it's more fun to stand together than to have individuals doing the dirty work. Individuals get harassed by both the bully and their kingdom. These people need a home. Btw, it's a game so play it ;-)
Learning the top kingdoms is awesome. I got 30k on my last learn, plus they don't want you doing actual ops/damage to them so its like free science.
So if I 'plan' to dealbreak and win, it's legit, but if I dont plan to dealbreak and still dealbreak and then win, it's not? Splendit logic!Quote:
Originally Posted by Karazy
I still say BB has the most legitimate win in the 10 most recent ages. Even Godly will have to admit this.
I'm not sure how yours is more legit than ours.
We were the front runners, got dealbroken, rallied utopia, fought Pyro for crown from a weaker position. You guys basically just CFed the only other top kingdom in the running and refused to friendly war because you knew you had no chance to win. #1 kingdom for sure. No disrespect or anything, but looking at BB, AMA and CR roster, BB's roster is by far the weakest. It was a HoH crown.
You had the rest of the game GB your only competition.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
You lost to the weakest kd.Quote:
We were the front runners, got dealbroken, rallied utopia, fought Pyro for crown from a weaker position. You guys basically just CFed the only other top kingdom in the running and refused to friendly war because you knew you had no chance to win. #1 kingdom for sure. No disrespect or anything, but looking at BB, AMA and CR roster, BB's roster is by far the weakest. It was a HoH crown.
You where there yourself. Age 55 is by far the most deserved one in the last 10 ages.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
As for last age... not quite similar to Age 55 with not having had any real wars. We spent like 10 days retalwarring you and a few days fighting Pewpew. Pretty similar to what you did eh? Just one big EOA fight.
Fighting pyro from a weaker position, you serious? ROFL.Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
No disrespect or anything, but if your roster is so good why don't you win every age?Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
Yeah 55 is the best crown probably of all time. Pyro had more time to prepare since they pulled out of GB and was bigger. On paper, they were in a stronger position. Their preparation was terrible and we capitalized. At least we fought someone though at a minimum of a "similar position." A HoH crown is basically winning without engaging in any conflicts.
I agree, we should be winning every round and last round was a strategic disaster. I'll take the blame for it because I didn't step up to overrule the war OOP plan and we fell behind against 2 allied kds. This round I told them that Im doing final say on all of the OOP stuff (setup, plan, etc). I didn't need it, though. We pretty much all agreed on the setup/plan within a couple hrs after final changes were released except number of rogues and number of undeads and whether or not to run warrior/tact on UDs. Maxi and I wanted warrior, topsy wanted tact -- both insanely powerful OOP. We actually only settled on tact with like 2 hrs left in protection. I think it turned out to be the right call.
Palem, is that a troll? They dealbroke. We didn't just GB them because we were afraid. I mean, we wanted to fight them. Like I understand how your ghetto mind works, but at the top we have a level of integrity that we don't break deals.
55 is probably not the best crown of all time :p
20/22 were the two best crowns by the best kd, I'd probably look at those ages.
He said most deserved in last 10 ages Zauper.
It's impossible to prove, but if you put the round 55 roster against any kingdom in the history of utopia, we would win every single time. Then if you factor in that we had to B2B2B 3 allied kds and win by over 100k land, it makes it even more impressive. That roster was stacked with legends.
ABA, I'm taking it a step further and saying all time.
We should have a war versus server for fun where you sign up 2 kingdoms of 25 people and give them X land to explore and they fight in 3 weeks.
Anything that isn't a triple crown has no right to be in consideration for the best crown ever
and lol @ BB being the best kd ever
55 isn't BB. It was pretty much TFs + mixture of CR/BB/AMA. Does anyone have the full roster?
Pulsing Trollfags led into BB. Either way, lol @ them being the best ever
I'm confident pansies age 20 (or 22 tbh) would win. Age 20 they won by 13%; BB won by 33%. Age 20 was much more competitive having like, actual good kds on the server to compete with (and not having a massive land bonus or 4 days of eow to use to prep for the next conflict -- you were in eow when the age ended, that's like 10% of the advantage over sanc :p).Quote:
Originally Posted by Godly
Pansies also won with what was definitively the worst race of the age, finishing three straight crowns. It was also the closest any kd has come to a triple crown, finishing #3 honor.
Age 55's BB cow -- mango -- was just a core player in Pansies, that's how stacked it was.
godly replied to that with best of all time.Quote:
Originally Posted by American Badass
#americaneducation
I thought BF triple crowned one age. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Zauper
(age 18)
Basically why they were extremely famous!
Accept for those kds that did Triple Crown? :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Zauper
I think there was 2. BF in age 18 and I can't remember the other. I thought it was Pansies but I may be mistaken
No one triple crowned on the real server. Sorry, crowning on WOL when BF existed doesn't count as a real achievement because you're not competing against the actual competition of the times.Quote:
Originally Posted by Palem
Someone may have done it on genesis, but same issue.
There was more real competition on the WoL server in age 18 than there is now.