Fail ban?

[Bishop]

They deleted my 2nd thread which was not spam and gave me a warning. Well Bishop did anyway.

Unsurprisingly posting pretty much the same thread as was previously deleted is not looked upon favourably. You would probably have had more success if you waited on a decision from a CM, rather than trying some moral grandstanding.

[DHaran]

It was an entirely different thread, clearly you just proved you didn't even read the posts. Well done.

[Bishop]

if you want i can make a big deal out of the content in that second post also and issue some infractions.

[DHaran]

My original post was talking about how the server crash ruined my day at work, and asked how others days were in relation to Utopia. That was the originating post, meaning the entire thread had no cause for deletion. I bet you didn't warn the guy in there calling me a fag did you? You are just a Jolt towel boy these days. Little Mourhelm Jr.

[Bishop]

Your original thread was spam, plain and simple. Your second thread was a mockery of the first deleted thread, that ended up containing content that was not appropriate to these forums. So far you have gotten off lightly, purely because emotions run high when the server is as gimped as it was and so some leeway is given. Continue to push your luck though and full forum rules will be enforced.
If you have cause for complaint you are well aware of the avenues open to you. Please use them.

[DHaran]

Oh, so you pick and choose when and who you want to enforce the rules upon? How very interesting, I will be sure to report this to the CMs.

I will also go report all threads that are mockeries.

[Bishop]

lmao, stop being a hypocrite - you whine when we enforce them too strictly, and now you complain when we apply judgment during a time of stress for players.

[DHaran]

Exactly, you can't have it both ways. You can't decide when and where to enforce rules, that's called being unfair and hypocritical.

There a dozens of threads far worse than the one you deleted yesterday, and you know it.

[Bishop]

no it is not, it is called using judgement. It is something posters have called for previously. Your thread was spam, please do not try and pretend it was not. I gave you some leeway earlier, but quite honestly now my patience has ran out.

[VT2]

This is not a good time for a crusade.

[Bishop]

i hope to hell you are speaking to dharan, if so then i strongly agree

[DHaran]

no it is not, it is called using judgement. It is something posters have called for previously. Your thread was spam, please do not try and pretend it was not. I gave you some leeway earlier, but quite honestly now my patience has ran out.

Then you lack judgment. Are you pretending that 50% of the threads on the front page right now aren't the same level of spam? Better get to deleting them too!

[MorbidAngel]

he was talking to you bish :) He meant you don't want to meke people even more angry by cleaning what maybe shouldn't be cleaned :)

[Bishop]

Then you lack judgment. Are you pretending that 50% of the threads on the front page right now aren't the same level of spam? Better get to deleting them too!

lol, yes - for sure your thread was the most spam-tacular.

[DHaran]

The bottom line is, based on the original post in the 2nd thread, there was a discussion started which was NOT spam, broke NO rules, and had ZERO reason to be deleted entirely. If anything the posts starting with someone calling me a fag should have been deleted and he warned (as well as me for retaliatory comments), but deleting the thread was not the correct action.