PewPew vs AMA

[Elldallan]

Thats just stupid, if one part of the conflict its not avaiable its no longer an active hostile situation.

If conflict started before the war started then there still is a conflict because running shouldn't be an acceptable end of conflict if the running party actually had a reasonable chance to end the conflict which jerks totally did according to what Elit claims he offered and it's been acknowledged by Tetley that that deal was actually offered. Running is just stupid and shouldn't be seen as the end of a conflict unless the running party were never given any chance to take a reasonable way out, Jerks were given a ridiculously cheap way out so until both parties can agree to a deal the conflict should still be considered to be ongoing.

Jerks refused a reasonable deal so they lost any right to suddenly decide that conflict is over.

[Elit]

Thats just stupid, if one part of the conflict its not avaiable its no longer an active hostile situation.

Notice was served on: July 7 of YR6 PewPew 48hrs Notice AMA (pew) has begun a Emerald Dragon project against
Jerks entered in war on: July 9 of YR6 OFF WORLD () has declared WAR with our kingdom!

So its sure break del for no notice in hostile/war/post war. To be more precise from deal terms:
[23:00] <Petrified> can't notice into/from war/eowcf/hostile?
[23:00] <Elit> yes no lame notices
[23:00] <Petrified> okay deal

If this is not lame notice what is...

[Binar]

I moved that notice 2 hours to when Jerks entered their war 32hrs ago, meaning that u got 74 hours from original notice was given

[Elit]

I moved that notice 2 hours to when Jerks entered their war 32hrs ago, meaning that u got 74 hours from original notice was given

Do you have logs inform us you move notice 2h later and its 72h from time we talked or you just decide it now when left 7h from official notice you gave us?

[Elldallan]

I moved that notice 2 hours to when Jerks entered their war 32hrs ago, meaning that u got 74 hours from original notice was given

Because Jerks refused a reasonable deal it still means you tried to notice into ongoing conflict, hence dealbreak according to the parts Elit has posted about deal.
Jerks had every chance to end the conflict, they didn't so they don't get to decide when conflict is over by running.

[DonJuan]

We trade hits for 6 days and ppl hit from his work too. Its easy to miss kd you retal war for 1 week run in war. Its was 1 hit only.

For sure...I'm not at all saying there was any OOW hits either since I haven't seen any news myself.

I was just talking in principle...since usually the consensus of a hostile is continuous attacks (from either/both sides?)...and if Jerks had run into another war...they could not have been engaging AMA in their hostile while warring their current enemy.

Unless they were but then again I have no news logs so this is more of a ponder than a question

[Palem]

And you are right, I do have bias - I am biased towards playing by established standards in the top which doesn't include ****playing unprovoked to such an extent. Until pewpew is gbed and punished properly they will keep playing this way, this is a lesson to all you guys who want to compete for land properly and fairly.

Forcing a b2b on a kd that's a tad bigger than half your size because they max gained before they surrendered is the proper and fair way to compete for the land crown?

[Elit]

For sure...I'm not at all saying there was any OOW hits either since I haven't seen any news myself.

I was just talking in principle
...since usually the consensus of a hostile is continuous attacks (from either/both sides?)...and if Jerks had run into another war...they could not have been engaging AMA in their hostile while warring their current enemy.

Unless they were but then again I have no news logs so this is more of a ponder than a question

Jerks run in another war dont fix our relation when we dont have deal so we still have "hostile relations" but same time its not ingame hostile till they leave his war so area are shady. If pew pew gave 72h notice after jerks run in war will be vulture not deal break. Big difference.

[Binar]

Yes there was an communication error where PewPew though fighting had ended on July 7th, the notice should had been given on July 9th and PewPew have acknowledge that and are counting the notice from July 9th.

^^^

Do you have logs inform us you move notice 2h later and its 72h from time we talked or you just decide it now when left 7h from official notice you gave us?

and our diplo talks were a failboat cause of your silly demands of EoA CF for 0 acres or 1 week to prep

[Elit]

^^^



and our diplo talks were a failboat cause of your silly demands of EoA CF for 0 acres or 1 week to prep

Dont have any logs with Shai, or new ingame msg with change notice date or new dragon restart in our news paper.

and yes you still can get eoa for 0 acres or we can war after 1 week prep. Its good and fair offers.

[Persain]

A hostile is over the moment both hostile kingdoms AGREE TO END HOSTILITIES. Its a bi-lateral decision, not a uni-lateral one.

Im hostile with pewpew....no one can notice them. i shall never agree to end hostilities so no one touch em ;)

spout your nonsense somewhere else.

[Binar]

And my offer still stands Elit: 3 weeks CF for 17% of your acres

[Elit]

Im hostile with pewpew....no one can notice them. i shall never agree to end hostilities so no one touch em ;)

spout your nonsense somewhere else.

So pew pew double deal break for send from hostile to another hostile notice. Binar really play it big one!

And my offer still stands Elit: 3 weeks CF for 17% of your acres

Dont really care for acres its for your rude attitude to me. i didn't sleep well last night :(

[Binar]

So pew pew double deal break for send from hostile to another hostile notice. Binar really play it big one!


Dont really care for acres its for your rude attitude to me. i didn't sleep well last night :(

Cello started it, as I told you since the start of this: Cello is to blame

[Palem]

Im hostile with pewpew....no one can notice them. i shall never agree to end hostilities so no one touch em ;)

I've been hostile with AMA since age 56. Hostile went to EoA and I never agreed on a resolution.

I demand acres for everyone deal breaking in our hostile!