lol, KatieR is a biggest nub so far. :( "under the morals of utopia this becomes an INACTIVE hostile the second the other KD throws in the towel" haha.
lol, KatieR is a biggest nub so far. :( "under the morals of utopia this becomes an INACTIVE hostile the second the other KD throws in the towel" haha.
Someone should probably copy KatieR's post for the next time NestasNubs waves a kd (re. divinity) for half an age
Jwuzi, can you be more consistent in your choice of words. Thanks!
Last edited by TheOne; 06-07-2015 at 18:34. Reason: OOh. Saw you editted. Ignore
Utopia is just social text-based chess/poker/starcraft/trading
There is only 1 important strategy in Utopia. Game Theory
Age 57-63 : Pyromaniacs co-leader
Age 64: Retired ghetto (Sillies)
Age 65: Retired warring ghetto (Sillies X)
To be continued...
-
Dont be a retail investor/trader. You will lose shinies.
cJ does this mean we have your blessing? :)
What is this "hostile protection" everybody's going on about?
Last time I heard someone claim hostile isn't over was Elit waving Tetley for adding +4h on withdraw wave! Didn't work out that well either if I remember correctly. :)
First of all you should work on that habit to reply with unfounded accusations.
More importantly tho, you are oversimplifying things to suit your needs. There is a huge moral difference between two people having a fight until there is a clear winner and, on the other hand, the winner keeping on to kick the loser in the head in search of some perverse kind of satisfaction. The only real question that needs answering is when does a hostile relation turn into a one-sided farming. It's been made clear in the other thread that there will be no diplomatic solution to this conflict so in your mind the winner deserves some kind of protection from whole server for an unlimited amount of time?
Pyro got protection for half+ of last age. FS got protection for 3+ weeks of last age in the opposite of this conflict....
and I see posts from ED's leadership that they're open to a reasonable resolution today.
And then I see Nesta waving in and indicating that it is in fact alliance action (i.e. that any resolution needs to involve FS as well) -- not just a random wave for conflict.
'Parthenogenesis
But I dont have any offer you are likely to take up on'
'Parthenogenesis
For now...4k honor and one full learn wave, without retals. Then EOA cf.' (they were getting like 1.5k honor per wave, so this amounts to 3x waves roughly, on top of what they took on initial wave)
'Parthenogenesis
No, those are the terms. Or we wait til your meter is maxed out and harvest it anyway. Or you can always push the button. If you take this to war, we would also agree on eoa cf after its done.'
can you please tell me the reasonable resolution part of those statements? ed leadership only says theyre open to resolution today, because they knew theyre wide open to many kds and wanted to look pretty & clean..
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)