ill stick with my humans and other races then :)
currently making 2k more food than i consume with 8% farms no FL and only 40% food sci and BE of 91%. even if im short on food, ill get it in form of aid since it hurts your tbg by like .004% and also with his tpa im sure he could steal enough food in 1 op to last him awhile. still if he doesnt have enough food, from my strat, take 1% from dungeons and 1% from stables putting him back at 10% farms.
"and if things go really well, less than 10% in your post war CF which means that half your GS can transform into homes for recovery."
^ this clears somethings... ok now im planning to have atleast 15% gs and prolly same amount of rax and once im sure ill become unbreakable thats the time i stop building GS and switch to forts. by this time homes would be useful coz of BR but i think 20hrs is too long to wait for it to be built then wait again for the BR increase to kick in.
what about my 15% TD 5 raw TPA and 80% crime? i usually use GA on non-a/t prov during war. is 10% TD enough? so i can put more % on rax.
you probably will never need to rebuild a single GS in war which is why you start high with them.
20h build times means they wont come in at the earliest, at the 35~h mark (assume 12h hit, and you not being there immediately to build it). By then, adding 2-3% GS won't make a difference, and it should also be clear by then whether you are chain target or not. You would rather consider forts before GS, which is the unbreakable transition greenie explained earlier.
The End of an Era
the main purpose of TD is to reduce thief loss so u can afford to fail some ops.
i dont think u'll need 5 raw tpa if u r not warring top kds but if u have enough sci and/or honor then sure why not
now since i wont be using homes. will stealing peasants be worth the stealth?
with 5 tpa, thats a waste, sorta like driving a Lamborghini at 20mph.
The End of an Era
unless your severely underpopulated no. stick to NS mainly with occasional burning of forts if someone is running a high % of them for a good portion of their defense. If your hit you just stole those peasants for no reason.
OOW, sure why notOriginally Posted by Bano
in war, no... much better stuff to do with your stealth and TPA
NS > Burn forts
only buildings you should be destroying with greater arson IMO are GS =)
even then you'll need 4-5 rogues putting in 30% stealth for it to be worth it, one thief wont do a thing
Last edited by _greenie; 15-06-2009 at 06:33.
Deliverance -> secrets -> anzac -> mercy -> rage -> "ghetto"
seriously flamingknight, you can go make yourself a thread for your own masturbatory needs.
if you need help, ill make the thread for you
The End of an Era
if i see someone running 20% forts ill burn them before using NS. its more efficient. adjectives are lovely should i bold occasionally?
see, the fact you will burn forts before NSing clearly shows why you should just stop.
The End of an Era
going from 20% -> 10% forts will drop def by ~10%
the stealth needed to do that could have killed at least 10% of the troops someone has =)
GA is a waste of stealth, unless you are trying to knock down GS =)
Deliverance -> secrets -> anzac -> mercy -> rage -> "ghetto"
Is Orc/Sage good combo?
Immune to plague but in war VERY easy to ambush.
Burning Forts is silly, at any tier of play.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
