My statement is correct, as even you, in fact admit it. You need to read it again to understand it.
Again: There is no kingdom who would have zero player movement, so all the boast from your behalf about "running" with 25 is a false track and not the point.
1) Many kingdoms run with 25. ZERO have the same 25 at age end as at age start.
2) Many kingdoms recruit. ZERO kingdoms never kicked anybody.
3) kingdoms run on 25 because that is the number set by mehul 12 years ago. If the number would be 20 or 5 or 178 they would run on that.
4)Bishop says: the devs will not release statistics about how many real full players kingdoms are out there (a.k.a. account numbers). A false statement because that is not more account info than rankings. Under same statement they should remove all the rankings too, because we can find out account numbers. Let's just please remember that statistics don't mean account info, as "account info" refers to a specific account, not about anonymous statistic... Thanks.
That means: a) that the situation is in fact worse than I thought, and b) they are afraid of an exodus if we find out the real numbers, as the numbers kept at 25 with sitting and different other stuff, seem to be lower than the official records.
ergo: your points, in the circumstances people described the change in this thread, don't stand.
There can be an age long reduction, even two ages long, which can mean you don't even have to kick anybody. Please do not come with the same refuted arguments over and over again, when there are several solutions posted for them already.
I only bash in cases like this when somebody puts words in my mouth, or other times when somebody is unreasonably idiot. Please point out where I said that I want to have the players who left their ex-kingdom to band togedher and organize into new kingdoms by themselves?





