Results 1 to 15 of 409

Thread: #2 province grande mucca deleted

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Needs to get out more DHaran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    8,415
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    You really don't get it do you? It doesn't matter if you think it doesn't apply. It does.
    lol no YOU don't get it. If there were 2 provinces not participating in the war, I can see your argument that it was a FW. That is not the case here. You essentially want to choose their war targets for them, this simple fact is absolutely unacceptable. Why would Ryan train up to hit the guy when he could just 4-tap others? And who says he wasn't going to hit the guy anyway? Now whatever words we use to trick a ghetto into a war can get us deleted? Is any of this getting through to you?

    I already covered a more suitable 24 prov NAP scenario, which you thought would be ok:

    <DHaran> i can go to an extreme too, what if each prov only agreed to hit a corresponding prov in enemy kds, so all 25 provs in both kds are trading hits, thats a FW?
    <Bishop> hmmmm
    <Bishop> i dunno, i suspect it would eb ok

    Can you explain why you think it's ok to NAP 24 provs this way, but not ok to NAP one?
    Last edited by DHaran; 26-01-2012 at 14:40.
    S E C R E T S

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •