Where do u draw the line between it being a fake war. For example me saying i wont hit someone as an agreement to get to war, and then plan a war around not hitting that person all the time knowing that if i HAD to i can easily break my promise to get the war win. That is lies and deceit should be an acceptable way (by the rules of the game, not how i play) to get a KD into war, and those kinds of non hits can always be changed.

Since its done and over why dont we stop crying and get some clarification on fake wars.

CASE 1:If i have a friend in another kd and i agree to not hit him and he agrees to not hit me its by definition a fake war? That is even if we each participate in chains and actively trade hits into the other kd but dont hit each other its a fake war?

CASE 2: How about if we SAY we wont hit each other, we dont but the ultimate goal is just to leave our friend as the LAST chain if the other kd is to stupid to surrender?

Please explain the difference between
1. NOT hitting someone becasue it goes against my war plan and asking them to make a similar war plan
2. Having a kd-kd agreement that there will be no dragons.

Or a difference between
1. We can only war u if your X prov doesn't fight, so the prov sits there and does nothing
2. We can only war u if your X prov doesn't fight, so the prov goes into vacation mode
3. You will win if your cow beats ours, so the cows dont fight each other or no war.
4. You will win if your cow beats ours, so the cows going into vacation mode.