Rage vs BIO

[lovefool]

The last 4 ages we tried to whore, we won 3 of those ages. I logged in once every 2 days last age and our ghetto finished 5th. That shows how bad this game is now.

Agree with syntico......arent the same anymore. Small player base now hence being top 10 is nothing to brag about. :D

[protector]

With that said other kingdoms have managed to put together better rosters for a single age or two, but no one has sustained the win like rage.

With several Abs kingdoms having disbanded, it may have made their recruitment a little easier. I suppose surviving in a longstanding alliance with a solid 'core' is a bit easier as an independent kingdom.
There is however, also some rather old kingdoms still around who could be competitive if they would be interested in whoring.. they're hardly seem to be though as they favor warring. Last few ages the odds to war in the top10/20 seem to be a lot bigger though, so perhaps they should step it up a notch and go for top20 wars :p

There are plenty of good players in lesser kingdoms or new players who learn quick, but it's not easy to spot them. Unknown players are often a gamble; they can say a lot but you cannot confirm any of it. A player can claim to login 4 times a day, just to get recruited to a better kingdom, but it doesn't mean he will. Getting such players to leave can be hard at times as well.

Perhaps it would be an idea to have sort off a 'trial' period for new recruits so a monarch has say a week to remove them if they turn out to be not fitting to a kingdom.

[protector]

So end conclusion Pulse is no where near Rage even if we compare
them in the 10 ages Pulse shows up in the charts,even if they are back and win an age again
or 2.

Awww did someone step onto your feet?

We can discuss about age 54 and everyone has an opinion about it
but fact remains that Simians had acres selling out of spite!!
Yes you can say that about more ages in the past...But that 1 was
more obvious to the crowd....and ranks would be different for Rage aswel
on nethw.

What is there to discuss? HoH won Age 54. What do you want to discuss about that?? :P
Adding a huge list of 1-10 finishes won't change anything to that. Afterall it was your allies Sanctuary that supposedly ****ed it up for ya, though luck.

[Falgun]

Awww did someone step onto your feet?



What is there to discuss? HoH won Age 54. What do you want to discuss about that?? :P
Adding a huge list of 1-10 finishes won't change anything to that. Afterall it was your allies Sanctuary that supposedly ****ed it up for ya, though luck.

Simians ****ed it up for themselves.But some ppl will just never agree.So lets agree to disagree who ****ed up.

[Korp]

I logged in once every 2 days last age and our ghetto finished 5th. That shows how bad this game is now.

Maybe if you logged in more often we could have finished even higher :<

[Awesomeness]

logging in is overrated

[goodz]

With several Abs kingdoms having disbanded, it may have made their recruitment a little easier. I suppose surviving in a longstanding alliance with a solid 'core' is a bit easier as an independent kingdom.
There is however, also some rather old kingdoms still around who could be competitive if they would be interested in whoring.. they're hardly seem to be though as they favor warring. Last few ages the odds to war in the top10/20 seem to be a lot bigger though, so perhaps they should step it up a notch and go for top20 wars :p

There are plenty of good players in lesser kingdoms or new players who learn quick, but it's not easy to spot them. Unknown players are often a gamble; they can say a lot but you cannot confirm any of it. A player can claim to login 4 times a day, just to get recruited to a better kingdom, but it doesn't mean he will. Getting such players to leave can be hard at times as well.

Perhaps it would be an idea to have sort off a 'trial' period for new recruits so a monarch has say a week to remove them if they turn out to be not fitting to a kingdom.

I disagree. I do not think there is any kingdoms warring who are capable of competing well in top 5

[protector]

Simians ****ed it up for themselves.But some ppl will just never agree.So lets agree to disagree who ****ed up.

Simians made a stupid move, but it was still Sanctuary who created the double. So no, I won't agree to disagree! ;p

[protector]

I disagree. I do not think there is any kingdoms warring who are capable of competing well in top 5

A top5 finish isn't that much of an accomplishment anymore though. And we where speaking about top10 afaik ;p
There have been kingdoms top10 for the past ages that in earlier ages would less likely end top10.

If you take a look at the rankings, there is a few kingdoms who had some larger finishes in the past ages while just warring purely for warring and not to gain land. When they're active enough, they could compete for top10 finish rather easy.
I think you underestimate some of the warring kingdoms. Take those nasty cats as example; did anyone expect them to win so many wars against top10 kingdoms? If you can beat them or put up a very though fight, you can definitely maintain yourself as a top10 whore kingdom. The downside is you'd have to join the political crap mostly, which they don't like :)

[goodz]

A top5 finish isn't that much of an accomplishment anymore though. And we where speaking about top10 afaik ;p
There have been kingdoms top10 for the past ages that in earlier ages would less likely end top10.

If you take a look at the rankings, there is a few kingdoms who had some larger finishes in the past ages while just warring purely for warring and not to gain land. When they're active enough, they could compete for top10 finish rather easy.
I think you underestimate some of the warring kingdoms. Take those nasty cats as example; did anyone expect them to win so many wars against top10 kingdoms? If you can beat them or put up a very though fight, you can definitely maintain yourself as a top10 whore kingdom. The downside is you'd have to join the political crap mostly, which they don't like :)

I believe you were saying that there was kingdoms who could challenge rage who are warring kingdoms. Cats have won a few good wars.

[Syntico]

Utopia metagame: WALL TEXT.. I'm going to outtype you foo!

[protector]

I believe you were saying that there was kingdoms who could challenge rage who are warring kingdoms. Cats have won a few good wars.

Your mind must be playing games with you then :P
I said I was sure some of the warring kingdoms should be able to compete top10 if that would be their wish, I never named any specific kingdoms. That said, just because Rage has won their last wars it doesn't mean they are invulnerable. You'll find that most kingdoms with a large advantage will win their wars mainly due to these advantages.
I fought Rage twice at a large disadvantage and pulled out a good fight despite these disadvantages. Had it been on even ground where no kingdom had a big advantage, I'm sure I would have at least broke even. Big talk? No, but I'm positive we would have given our activity and strategy vs large disadvantage.

[goodz]

prot did you not play in insolence? KD has not been able to compete in top 5 for over 2 years. When it was able you were not there.

[protector]

prot did you not play in insolence? KD has not been able to compete in top 5 for over 2 years. When it was able you were not there.

You talk a lot of **** about stuff you know nothing about :)
Go do some research before you continue talking more bull****

[tak3shi]

prot did you not play in insolence? KD has not been able to compete in top 5 for over 2 years. When it was able you were not there.

lulz