Mercy vs Pulse round 2.

[Evillone]

And if you want to know how we managed the streak I can explains! See Elurin is a tactical genuies, he recruits nubs like me and then at start of new age he askes me "what should we do to be ultra proes next age?" and so then I give him my ideas. He then promptly sets kingdom orders to reflect the exact opposite of what I say and BAMB 21 win streak. Simple see?

[Red]

Yes!
And also War Forum games and Proetry !!

[Evillone]

Well yes you can't discount the war forum games and proetry! But I figured they all new about that already?

[KuhaN]

sometimes i wonder

And i just dont know

I just dont know...

[LCP]

Congrats to Pulse for the Crown win. Well deserved & Well played in the 7 days of hostile/war.

Hope to see you guys again next age if both kds r still going to play for Crown.

[LCP]

what you actually mean is the only kd to give you so many acres this age and thank them for giving you the chance to win when they could have kept you in hostile or stare contest till end of age :P

We could stare till EoA and let Sanc catch up but that is not how we play. We go hard or go home.

If we can't stop them from crowning in a war..then there is no reason to stall them because they deserve to win the age.

[Godly]

See thier you go getting upset again. It's funny that you keep insisting it had anything to do with skill and not the fact I was inactive due to being in the hospital and the heavily medicated when I got out

Being in the hospital is no excuse for being inactive. I went to the hospital 4 rounds ago and I made them setup a computer next to me.

[flogger]

Flogger seems to think half crowns are worth something, so why not race and island crowns? Not that half crowns are bad, but half a crown is half a crown. If you go to a steakhouse and order a 12oz steak and they serve you only 6, would you accept it if the waiter replies "sucks for you mr. palmer, in the current economy, i consider 6 oz as 12 oz"

And for all of flogger's ego and supposed greatness, he still has not and arguably cannot, repeat back to back, a feat that has only been accomplished 3 times (once around every 10~15 ages since Age 20). I toot my own horn here, but when flogger repeats, he will be allowed to sit beside me in this pantheon of greatness. He talks a lot and wins wars against weak competition, but this does not make him a very good leader/player. Just a one eyed man in the land of a blind. The unsung hero in the current utopia landscape is Dirty`. He is the only player remaining in this game who truly cannot be beaten, straight up one on one no funny roro/dorje-dirty business.

I didn't know winning back to back was something to even aim for, seeing as how since age 6 I've yet to even try or play for crowns in back to back ages. And its interesting that you consider your crowns when I was finishing 3rd and 5th respectively with Mercy in my first ages back with your best and only wars wins being against Trinity and EQ as winning crowns in a non-watered down era.

The age 4 half crown barely counts, since I considered that a loss, but the Pulse half crown counts as a full crown, as the only thing keeping us from networth was the idea that we would fight our allies for #1 at age end, which we did, which allowed #3, also our ally, to squeak by. Again, fight more than one person an age and you'd find winning networth to be harder.

Beat someone better than Trinity (or better yet join Trinity and crown like I could and have been doing) and you would be in the conversation of greatniss, but as of now Mehul was a much bigger rival.

[Awesomeness]

I didn't know winning back to back was something to even aim for, seeing as how since age 6 I've yet to even try or play for crowns in back to back ages. And its interesting that you consider your crowns when I was finishing 3rd and 5th respectively with Mercy in my first ages back with your best and only wars wins being against Trinity and EQ as winning crowns in a non-watered down era.

The age 4 half crown barely counts, since I considered that a loss, but the Pulse half crown counts as a full crown, as the only thing keeping us from networth was the idea that we would fight our allies for #1 at age end, which we did, which allowed #3, also our ally, to squeak by. Again, fight more than one person an age and you'd find winning networth to be harder.

Beat someone better than Trinity (or better yet join Trinity and crown like I could and have been doing) and you would be in the conversation of greatniss, but as of now Mehul was a much bigger rival.

Psych Ward is recruiting.

[Syntico]

I didn't know winning back to back was something to even aim for, seeing as how since age 6 I've yet to even try or play for crowns in back to back ages. And its interesting that you consider your crowns when I was finishing 3rd and 5th respectively with Mercy in my first ages back with your best and only wars wins being against Trinity and EQ as winning crowns in a non-watered down era.

The age 4 half crown barely counts, since I considered that a loss, but the Pulse half crown counts as a full crown, as the only thing keeping us from networth was the idea that we would fight our allies for #1 at age end, which we did, which allowed #3, also our ally, to squeak by. Again, fight more than one person an age and you'd find winning networth to be harder.

Beat someone better than Trinity (or better yet join Trinity and crown like I could and have been doing) and you would be in the conversation of greatniss, but as of now Mehul was a much bigger rival.

Hey Flogger if you can win back to back, do it - it is not about trying or haven't tried, it's about doing it (since you haven't done it, I'm going to ignore your troll about anything re it). Realest has been part of a kingdom that has done it, does it matter "which kingdom/s" he "beat" to do it? (I'm not going to go into how good the kingdoms you beat this age are because it would hurt a lot of people's feelings :( ). But every kingdom in every age go through its own challenges, and the test is about rising up to those challenges. You astonish me really.. you know this, Sword did that this age, and fully deserve to win. You understand how taxing and tiring it is to even do it in one age, and you're going to sit here and question people who have done it back to back?

How many kingdoms have done it? Only 3. (we're talking about winning both NW and Land here only, winning split crowns are not my thing)

Pansies in 18, 19 and 20 (they actually threepeated)
Playboys of Absalom in 37, 38
Sonata in 44, 45

Also talks about finishing 3rd and 5th are just laughable, in this watered down era of Utopia, it is all about #1. Last age I logged in 2-3x a week, finished around 1.6k and the ghetto kingdom I'm supposed to be retired in finished like Top 5-6 (Faery Circle, yeah Palem is not going to deny it being a dark ghetto).

[Palem]

I've never said anything contrary to that lol.

Is mercy still going to try and deny that ghetto tag 58 is the better kd?

[Syntico]

I've never said anything contrary to that lol.

Is mercy still going to try and deny that ghetto tag 58 is the better kd?

Are you going to deny that you're ugly? :P

[Korp]

Also talks about finishing 3rd and 5th are just laughable, in this watered down era of Utopia, it is all about #1. Last age I logged in 2-3x a week, finished around 1.6k and the ghetto kingdom I'm supposed to be retired in finished like Top 5-6 (Faery Circle, yeah Palem is not going to deny it being a dark ghetto).

Ironically you brag about Realest back to back crown and then you go and talk about this is a watered down era, consider the back to back crown was also already in a watered down era.

[gergnub]

Ironically you brag about Realest back to back crown and then you go and talk about this is a watered down era, consider the back to back crown was also already in a watered down era.

its still a back to back.

[tetley]

Where are all the posts about strategy and explaining how you won?
Real Utopian Winners are the ones who share their knowledge with the community :P