Quote Originally Posted by Feint View Post
Kinda confused of what is going on. Anyway, Mask did gracefully hand the war win to Helix.
If they are really keen in using underhand resort to get war win to top the chart, they could have well chose to war till eoa where there is still a slightest chance to getting the crown or perhaps in the hope helix will give in. So from the above reason stated,Mask action justify their legitimate wins. Or is there any one with evidence to overthrow this fact? One will always remain innocent unless we can find evidence to charge him guilty, right?
I find it annoying that people discount the effort, activity, and coordination it takes to even contend for the war crown. It's been said on these forums that there aren't enough kingdoms competing, but those same people dismiss the difficulty of getting a war crown despite the fact that it's the most competitive aspect of Utopia.

To those people- If it's that easy, why don't YOU get control of an average KD, master your setup and strategy, and lead them to get a 7/7 (or better) war record. Sometimes, if you're lucky, you might get an easy war or get a lucky break when a larger KD decides to WD. But chances are you're not gonna get "lucky" 7 times. Especially when you start getting 4/4 and up. With more land and honor each war win, the pool of KDs that would even be willing to war you only gets tougher and tougher.

People use the fact that one particular war seems lucky (emphasis on "seems") to justify their preconceived notion that the war crown is meaningless. They don't consider that to even get to the point where one war win might give you the crown is a feat in and of itself.

But yeah, Masks must have cheated, why else would they have a good war record?