Why is it up to Pew to decide what is a hostile and isn't? Where do you draw the line? Isn't it just a slippery slope to deciding, oh hey this war isn't legitimate, let's wave into it as well?

You guys cried for pages about how AMA hitting into your war was bull****. Are you telling me that if AMA had hit Strippers after five hits it would be acceptable because it wasn't a "real" hostile?? No, I didn't think so.

I think by doing this you guys lost any credence you had in your complaint that what AMA did was wrong. You basically did the exact same thing as them: decided that a conflict was illegitimate or insufficient, then took the liberty of hitting into it because you felt entitled to acres.

Did Jerks do anything to deserve you hitting us while we were hostile with another kingdom? No. The truth is that in most other ages, this would have been considered bull****, regardless of what you think about it. The only reason you guys are able to do it is because of your previous dispute with AMA.

Petri, you don't get to decide what is a hostile and what isn't. You talk **** in this thread about farming us and say you did nothing inappropriate... you could at least own the fact that it's wrong of you guys to hit into our hostile, and that the real justification for doing so is your bad blood with AMA. To say that you are completely right to hit into our hostile is just disingenuous and lacks integrity. One would think that considering you guys have had two instances of people hitting into your conflicts this age, that you would have a better attitude.