Page 38 of 48 FirstFirst ... 283637383940 ... LastLast
Results 556 to 570 of 720

Thread: Pew Pew vs AMA

  1. #556
    Forum Addict John Snowstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Galway, Ireland
    Posts
    1,393
    Your problem was not activity, it was strategy, and it will continue to be such until you realise that activity isn't everything.

    Pew Pew confirmed for not being top kd material.
    _______________________________________________________________________________________

    #tactics

    ____________________________________________________

    I'll McGovern you up, son. Wait, you know who McGovern was, right?

  2. #557
    I like to post
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    4,531
    JSS is kinda harsh but its very true. You gained 800 acres in hostile but you totally loss battle in hostile. War was over 5min after we declared it.
    “the mystery of life isn’t a problem to solve, but a reality to experience.”
    ― Frank Herbert, Dune

    “I should've suspected trouble when the coffee failed to arrive.”
    ― Frank Herbert, Dune

  3. #558
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,894
    Well played AMA and Unlucky PewPew

  4. #559
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,010
    Its fine to lose wars, not everyone can win 100% of the time against everyone.

    It's not fine to ****play and talk **** and accuse people of running. Pewpew basically "claimed" AMA out of war with this thread, tagging "pewpew vs. ama", a dragon project but 0 hits. Everyone in AMA and even other kingdoms based on this knew that AMA was not hostile with pewpew but that pewpew would double team AMA if they waved another kingdom. I would love to hear an explanation from binbin or tox about this type of play and why they considered themselves hostile to us..pew also robbed our gold into eow which is ****play by anyone's standards.

    This is pure power and ****play, if you want to be "hostile" with someone you need to give them button - until you do that there is no valid hostile.

    Personally I've experienced pewpew for several ages dating back to my days leading Rage (we had two conflicts with them in b2b ages. I saw how pew plans age, setup, and executed strat throughout whole age. I said this before and will say it again, pewpew is not good as good at strategy/macro/prov and game mechanics as the top kds. Pewpew understands and knows how to war and has good activity but that's not enough. Your understanding of strategy is what makes you better than other kds and why AMA is a better kd than pew2. In this case pewpew waved AMA from an advantaged position with larger kingdom/core and 3 UB cows. Complete fail on strategy contributed to these results more than activity. When I was in Rage we did not have amazing activity but we were very good at strategy which lead to the results we had for many ages. AMA has top notch strategy and great activity but again strategy is much more important than activity.

    I personally would have more respect for pewpew if they didnt claim to be the best warring kd (this is not true and has been proven repeatedly) and if they didnt continuously ****play and shape the charts via eoa farmouts.
    Last edited by Proteus; 15-01-2014 at 14:52.

  5. #560
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    378
    /me hands the talking stick to Pew2. Care to comment? :)

  6. #561
    Forum Fanatic Binar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Nubway
    Posts
    2,049
    TLDR Proteus, but I guess its you explaining how we suck and you pwn
    Snakes
    PewPEW
    Divinity
    Emeriti

    Non of my nubs speak for my KD

  7. #562
    I like to post Band of Horses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Binar View Post
    TLDR Proteus, but I guess its you explaining how we suck and you pwn
    I've developed a system for reading Protie posts. You read the first 4 words of the paragraph, if in those 4 words he uses I/It's/Win/Lose/**** then stop there and skip to next paragraph.
    "The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)

  8. #563
    I like to post Sheister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    in a ditch by the side of the road
    Posts
    4,389
    So band, you just don't read it at all?

  9. #564
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    446
    nice war ama. I think one thing lots of the kd's facing you in these vulture environments don't realize is how effective you guys have gotten at pumping in eowcf+3days. Not sure if you are doing anything differently like sold swapping or if the people vulturing you just aren't stocking to pump for you(seems the latter) but people are consistently thinking that vulturing involves still being of same pump/stock as the target.

  10. #565
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,846
    with someone you need to give them button - until you do that there is no valid hostile.
    These definitions of hostiles keeps getting better, but I guess this means its allowed to hit into AMA during their waves unless they have given the button to someone. lol.

  11. #566
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    296
    I'm not sure that vulturing actually exists anymore with the good bonuses in eowcf and the 3 extra days with good fort bonuses.

    Also, @Proteus - PewPew would have razed you or massacred you or something into your eowcf to give you a button, but that's considered poor form. You are saying it's not cool for them to let you know they're coming but their only other alternative is to make a play most consider dirty so they are hostile with you before anyone else can be. I think it's better for them to say "we're coming, no matter what, so don't run" rather than hit into your eowcf. It's the lesser of two evils I guess.

  12. #567
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    296
    Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
    These definitions of hostiles keeps getting better, but I guess this means its allowed to hit into AMA during their waves unless they have given the button to someone. lol.
    The whole redefinition of what "hostile" means to fit a particular agenda is the problem. I think the only sane definition we can all agree upon is that if one kd has given another the button, those kds are hostile until they CF or the situation resolves in some other way. Using that definition has the added benefit of stopping people waving a kd whose armies are out against a 3rd party, which is happening more and more and is super shady.

  13. #568
    Dear Friend Korp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    8,846
    Quote Originally Posted by Drixx View Post
    The whole redefinition of what "hostile" means to fit a particular agenda is the problem. I think the only sane definition we can all agree upon is that if one kd has given another the button, those kds are hostile until they CF or the situation resolves in some other way. Using that definition has the added benefit of stopping people waving a kd whose armies are out against a 3rd party, which is happening more and more and is super shady.
    But if neither wants to given button and they are just hitting each other without giving the button isnt that a hostile act?

  14. #569
    I like to post Band of Horses's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
    But if neither wants to given button and they are just hitting each other without giving the button isnt that a hostile act?
    I'd say that is an unfriendly act. :P
    "The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)

  15. #570
    Forum Addict John Snowstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Galway, Ireland
    Posts
    1,393
    He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces
    _______________________________________________________________________________________

    #tactics

    ____________________________________________________

    I'll McGovern you up, son. Wait, you know who McGovern was, right?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •