Simians vs Pew Pew

[Bishop]

wiki.utopia-game.com

edit away.

[Anri]

Naw, it's already served its purpose. I do suggest clarifying the rules (because there are none posted anywhere), though, rather then assuming (anyone) knows implications. Either in game or in the guide or both

Players attempting to manipulate rules and quirks of the game in ways obviously not intended may be subject to deletion. Because of their nature, these types of circumstances are considered on a case-by-case basis. Users should avoid actions they believe are against the spirit and intent of the game.

You fall under this category Ovenmitt.

For you, this should of been common knowledge and i am more then sure it was. You just did not care.

But, for new players, it could be good to update the guide. You should have the time for it now and you know first hand what happens.

What i find strange and never knew about VM abuse is that it gets to keep its GBP moving out from it. But its okey, since there should have been a 24h suspension when moving you out.
If you also had used common sense you would have known all of this were going to happen, dodging and trying to manipulate the game like this should never pay off.

If i had not been persistant probably nothing would have happend.

[Chuck]

wiki.utopia-game.com

edit away.

Eury, some things don't need to be explained. . If you have been around the game long enough that you feel the need to manipulate the game mechanics to get ahead then you already know what you are attempting to get away with is against the spirit of the game.

Ovensh*t.. serves you right! Enjoy your "vacation" lol.

[Godly]

How does one know that Ovenmitt didn't actually have a vacation planned other than him admitting to going to VM to escape hits? Like I'm thinking in terms of the future. Is it just a given now that in a top kingdom if you're going on vacation you set a sitter?

Should we remove vacation mode for the top kingdoms entirely? Or is it a general rule of thumb that you can't set VM in a hostile? What defines a hostile? Is it Proteus' first, second, or third definition?

[Band of Horses]

I go into vacation mode as soon as I see MS on me. Is this abuse of system?

[StratOcastle]

I go into vacation mode as soon as I see MS on me. Is this abuse of system?

No, but MV might be. Consider it Meteor Vacation.

[Ovenmitt]

Players attempting to manipulate rules and quirks of the game in ways obviously not intended may be subject to deletion. Because of their nature, these types of circumstances are considered on a case-by-case basis. Users should avoid actions they believe are against the spirit and intent of the game.

You fall under this category Ovenmitt.

For you, this should of been common knowledge and i am more then sure it was. You just did not care.

But, for new players, it could be good to update the guide. You should have the time for it now and you know first hand what happens.

What i find strange and never knew about VM abuse is that it gets to keep its GBP moving out from it. But its okey, since there should have been a 24h suspension when moving you out.
If you also had used common sense you would have known all of this were going to happen, dodging and trying to manipulate the game like this should never pay off.

If i had not been persistant probably nothing would have happend.

Think about it though, even if it was a 3 day suspension. What has changed from 24 or 48h ago besides nothing?

:)

How does one know that Ovenmitt didn't actually have a vacation planned other than him admitting to going to VM to escape hits? Like I'm thinking in terms of the future. Is it just a given now that in a top kingdom if you're going on vacation you set a sitter?

Should we remove vacation mode for the top kingdoms entirely? Or is it a general rule of thumb that you can't set VM in a hostile? What defines a hostile? Is it Proteus' first, second, or third definition?

This is what I am attempting to address. I don't really care what happens to my province, its impossible to 1vs a kingdom, but im my mind the spirit of the game is winning, and I will do what I have to, so long as it doesnt break any rules (and this didn't).

[Palem]

This is what I am attempting to address. I don't really care what happens to my province, its impossible to 1vs a kingdom, but im my mind the spirit of the game is winning, and I will do what I have to, so long as it doesnt break any rules (and this didn't).

It did break the rules. That's why you were actioned.

[Spice]

Lame, mods made a mistake here.

Simians, you do know that you are creating a grudge with a kd that is stronger than yours? They might be smaller than you this time, but what preents them from taking revenge future ages and hitting you into all your future wars?

[Sheister]

its what simians lives for. just let it be.

[Bishop]

Lame, mods made a mistake here.

Simians, you do know that you are creating a grudge with a kd that is stronger than yours? They might be smaller than you this time, but what preents them from taking revenge future ages and hitting you into all your future wars?

What mistake did Palem make?

[Ovenmitt]

How does one know that Ovenmitt didn't actually have a vacation planned other than him admitting to going to VM to escape hits? Like I'm thinking in terms of the future. Is it just a given now that in a top kingdom if you're going on vacation you set a sitter?

Should we remove vacation mode for the top kingdoms entirely? Or is it a general rule of thumb that you can't set VM in a hostile? What defines a hostile? Is it Proteus' first, second, or third definition?

It did break the rules. That's why you were actioned.

It broke no posted or accessible rule. That is the issue.
Intent and individual interpretations are not compelling arguments, and you would get laughed out of a courthouse with them.

[Bishop]

It broke no posted or accessible rule. That is the issue.

I'll be the judge of that, thanks.

[Ovenmitt]

I'll be the judge of that, thanks.

I wasn't trying to make you the bad guy. If you could kindly screenshot said rule in game, I'd appreciate it.

[Anri]

Lame, mods made a mistake here.

Simians, you do know that you are creating a grudge with a kd that is stronger than yours? They might be smaller than you this time, but what preents them from taking revenge future ages and hitting you into all your future wars?

They created this grudge not us. We are putting an end to it. If they wanna do something different then make terms for future fair play thats up to them. Just dont expect Simians to fold down first. We never have and never will. Im a fan of ending this and create fair gaming enviroment in the future of this age and upcoming ages. If one or the other cant fight back etc just basic fairness applies. No more then 2 free waves at most etc. Dont push it. Let this be a lesson to more then our two kds. Its not that hard. An eye for an eye has applied here all the time. Play fair and get played fair back. No need for anything else then wars of gentlemen.