Hey Foxy, enjoyed your little vacation? Congratulations on your birthday, did you turn 13 or 14, Parth told me but I forgot!
Hey Foxy, enjoyed your little vacation? Congratulations on your birthday, did you turn 13 or 14, Parth told me but I forgot!
Had a wonderful time thanks, let me realise how the outcome couldn't have really gotten any better.
Wouldn't trade this for crushing FS over the next 10 ages. :)
Sounds a little bit like grooming, hard enough with Parth and Duk trying to molest me, tone it down a bit.
===
Palem, not sure if it sounds like that was aimed at you rather than Gorash. :P
I don't think you are capable of a single post without misrepresentation or lies as most of us see it. the only regret was that you were not playing to be punished for all your **** play and lies.. nice kd btw seems fake rage players left in droves great bunch of players can't hack it unless thier **** play can keep them on top
Maybe, think we'd need some terms though.
I get to wave FS for 10 forum posts then you get to apologise for FS actions. I suppose something like 750 words for every day of the conflict would be enough to inform the utopian community that you're on the path of redemption.
Maybe in a few years time you could also update your location to "Upholder of Ethical Values"
You mean a couple ages after bishop wrote incorrect age changes resulting in fort/thievery not working as described which seemed to catch everyone but AMA by surprise?
You mean when AMA tried to claim that sanc had been farming gold the entire prep period, and demanded that they drop cf to prove that they had one up and so a few provs stole when the cf was dropped at AMAs request?
You mean when AMA tried to dodge mercy vulturing them by going after sanc after war instead of preparing for mercy?
I remeber that age quite well, it was one of at least three crowns elit cost himself/ama by being too greedy
For someone who just met abs this age you sure remember things that hurt abs from 4 years ago remarkably well
You mean the age where you declared alliance war on Absalom along with several other alliances based on false information and all massively gangbanged us unprovoked and then once we got our own help and your allies started backing out and things started looking bad for you and you then apologized? You're right, we didn't just cf instantly as soon as we started to turn the tide after you MAP'd up and mass gb'd us based on your false info.
That is not at all the same as advising the #1 prov to force a cf by razing into eow if a kd refused to cf him and then offering all land and extra back for the cf and then the kingdom that advised him also offering their own land and whatever else was needed to ensure there was no harm to your position. So no, not in the same ballpark.
I believe the "fake forum nick" you refer to was the player in the #1 province using his province name as his forum account since he didn't have any existing forum account and was hiding his identity in YR0? I don't think anyone in Emeriti used any fake forum nicks did they?
Flogger got caught advising and gold farming to his allies to help them hurt his competition by waving Rage into a real hostile/war with Floggers other allies. When I confronted Flogger, he directly lied and denied everything. Only once I showed the council logs proving everything did he finally admit and apologize for what he did but offered no compensation. This was when Absalom was strong yet I didn't make what he did public on the forum, I didn't make it public within Absalom, and I only told one or two other leaders in my kingdom. We didn't plan, threaten, or do anything non 1v1 over this.
Emeriti's crime was advising a friendly player who had the #1 province to get a cf with BB and if BB wouldn't cf him, he could threaten to raze into post war to force one. The #1 player razed and offered all land and interest back for a cf after he could not get a response to his cf request ingame. Emeriti offered BB whatever compensation they felt they needed to ensure they were in no way harmed. This is a lot lesser crime that flogger farming gold to his ally to fund them waving unprovoked into an active hostile/war with floggers other ally.
You see flogger, real responsible leaders deal with situations, both when wrong and when wronged, reasonably and fairly. You on the other hand lie and deny when wrong until 100% proven then might offer a private apology but nothing more. When you have even a minor wrong against you, instead of being a real responsible leader and working out a reasonable solution, you instead are overjoyed at your fortune to have an excuse to deal break and gb into war the kingdom ahead of you on the chart that you can't beat 1v1 even when they are offering you whatever compensation you need.
Last edited by AquaSeaFoam; 08-07-2015 at 02:50.
#Rage
Best FAKE Kingdom in Utopia
AWAR Specialists
Fair Play Alliance Cornerstone
***** Most number of Awar Crowns - 5 *****
So awar is over but the alliance is still alive and busy working together.
Summary so far:
1.ED waves FS hard, caught their pants down, refused to cf due to terms laid out not agreeable by FS.
2. There come FS good friend, Pyro who wave ED hard as well , theoretically hitting into hostile that stated 127 vs 150 on meter
3. ED wanted to CF Pyro. Pyro wanted a 3-way deal. They only CF ED if ED willing to CF FS . Oops... So if pyro wasn't called in by FS , why will their terms offered in such a manner. Up to viewers to judge.
4. ED had no choice. But decided not to throw in the towel so fast. They demanded the honor loss to pyro from BB and they will accept .
5. BB agreed as they wanted to landdrop. Not sure why though.
Conclusion: I believe another episode will be coming up for the BB and their awar friends. Stay tuned
are you really bringing up us giving GC to someone 5 years ago again in a war you won? good lord dude. Give it a rest, you've been saying this for a month. I had multis 15 years ago too, you should get me on that too!
This is why no neutral people support you, you come off like a crazy person.
Last edited by flogger; 08-07-2015 at 06:41.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)