Exactly! Emeriti needs to stop *****ing because they set the standard for ages to come.Originally Posted by Palem
Exactly! Emeriti needs to stop *****ing because they set the standard for ages to come.
I like the new "Because we can!" motto. It is a big step up from your previous posts of wild unbelievable lies and fabricated "log" files trying to justify your actions. I guess you needed to secure your position before having the guts to own up instead of make up random false accusations.
What you going to do about it? Whine in forums? Stop wasting your breath and pick up the pieces of your pathetic alliance that got stomped so we can do it again next age. Remember it was the actions of your alliance that forced us to form ours.
FYI, Emeriti didn't have an alliance until after your alliance (BB and Pyro have been allied since at least the start of last age) deal broke and 2v1'd Emeriti into your war.
He razed into EOWCF exactly like the logs told him to do it.
Remember when I said when the made-up rules of conduct would tear apart and create a crisis if they weren't nipped in the bud through relatively easy rule changes?
bombdigie,
You mean Pyro waved into hostile to 2v1 ED exactly like the logs told them to do it?
That is the point, if those relatively easy rule changes were to occur, then none of this drama would exist, and that's a bad thing. The only thing this game has left is drama.
I think you are quite aware that I have no diplomatic influence on anything, this is abundantly clear, yes? I'm not sure about the semantics (and logs) and everyone is entitled to their opinions, but having been victim of a 5v2 gang bang, an attack on one is an attack on all in my book.
define "told someone" to do it. Because I'm fairly sure no one in our kingdom other than perhaps me or prot have the authority to tell anyone to do it and I'm fairly sure no one else in our kingdom thinks they have the authority to tell someone to do it and me and prot say we didn't tell anyone to do it.
I've already admitted to being too inactive to read anything or have any idea what was going on, which was probably wrong to FS since I should have paid more attention to their situation. We had a 3 week war, I needed a break.
and I'm still curious what people are complaining about, once I was texted about the situation I pretty simply asked "what do you need to make you happy" and we complied within a matter of hours and a ceasefire was reached. What is the issue here exactly?
Last edited by flogger; 09-07-2015 at 02:30.
Bombdigity is digging himself into quite the deep hole at the moment...
That gangbang was like 3 weeks ago booooo
So flogger what actually happened? Why is bb giving reparations?
Dear jwowzi I miss your face and your yelling at me.
All for one and one for Chrystal!!
Because I asked your diplomat what would make you happy and you said give us 2.5k honor we lost and eoa CF for all parties involved and I said yes?
Last edited by flogger; 09-07-2015 at 02:40.
Flogger will you be my peg boy?
All for one and one for Chrystal!!
It's been posted here that Nesta said Bb approved them waving ED into hostile. It's convenient how no one in BB besides you and prot have authority to tell anyone to do anything yet you focused pretty hard on how a non-leader in Emeriti suggested that Bour raze after 3h if BB wouldn't respond to his cf attempt.
Sounds like what I did with you. The difference seems to be that ED was reasonable and didn't demand that Pyro and FS both raze down to under 1000 acres per prov and drop out of all competition for 12+ weeks and say no other resolution would be considered.
Certainly waving into an active hostile to help your ally 2v1 a kingdom is worse than 380acres of razes with the offer of them all back plus interest for a cf on a kingdom that was not responding to cf requests. Yet ED was still reasonable while you were not.
Last edited by AquaSeaFoam; 09-07-2015 at 03:03.
If you're active enough to read/post in these forums, then surely you could've gotten to the bottom of this already. Its a simple matter of asking your own council. And, if they wouldnt fess up, of asking Nesta himself. So I dont buy that you dont know what happened.
And getting a ceasefire via double hostile doesnt exactly make ppl happy. :P
Its been posted in here Nesta said BB approved them waving into hostile, and now I'm saying that wasn't the case and Nesta told me he didn't say that so....? (I spoke to all parties within the last few hours)
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote