Sheister vs Sampuan

[Palem]

Why? Godly isn't the one arguing with me lol

[Sheister]

Oh? I guess that is what I get for skimming. All I saw was "blah blah blah Palem, Blah blah blah Godly."

[Zauper]

amigad round 2!

[StratOcastle]

amigad round 2!

I'm as surprised as you are. I was hoping we'd put on some acres and give you guys something to deal with.

Ynow that sound when you're reading or watching tv and a bird fles into your window...

[Zauper]

So, not surprised at all? :p

[Aranfein]

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?

[2Utopian]

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?

Explain why this would be such a bad strategy or should be frowned upon like you seem to insinuate Angels. Perhaps I misread your tone.

[Zauper]

I see FS tagged no war? Will it be a forced war or just farming them as revenge for them beating you?

Or perhaps just reminding the war tier that losing lots of land in war might win the battle(war) and lose the conflict (multi-war timespan!) pewpewpewpew.

[LoRD_SaMPuaN]

Or perhaps just reminding the war tier that losing lots of land in war might win the battle(war) and lose the conflict (multi-war timespan!) pewpewpewpew.

please explain zauper - we were already 37k acres vs 45k of theirs when we agreed to war, they could do the exact same thing they are doing now back then & they could do it without losing a war.. also, every whoring kd can do the exact same thing to any war kd out there, so whats the point here?

p.s. i like how you rename war into battle btw..

[Meep]

Explain why this would be such a bad strategy or should be frowned upon like you seem to insinuate Angels. Perhaps I misread your tone.

Because Pyro claims to be warring this age and they already lost the war, aren't going to get another war, and are just preventing either KD from actually getting to war for the foreseeable future.

[Zauper]

please explain zauper - we were already 37k acres vs 45k of theirs when we agreed to war, they could do the exact same thing they are doing now back then & they could do it without losing a war.. also, every whoring kd can do the exact same thing to any war kd out there, so whats the point here?

p.s. i like how you rename war into battle btw..

Yes, they could have. But on the flip side, your strategy is largely based on losing land in war -- you run very few attackers, you tend to lose a lot of land off your hitters, especially if the war doesn't run super long -- so it's quite easy for a kingdom to withdraw from the war and then turn around and beat you afterwards due to all the land you lost in war.

That strategy only works if kingdoms aren't willing to turn around and wave you again after.

[citadela01]

...

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.

[Zauper]

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.

That would be if someone were to say, for example --

Don't worry FS, if you just tell them you aren't hostile, perhaps pyro will wave them and save you!

:p

Honestly, I don't know why you guys didn't anticipate this? I've expected it since the WD.

[Meep]

meh ... let them have their fun Francis, nothing we can do anyway atm, youll just drag all the trolls out in the open.

It's been weeks since drama, we need more drama, I strongly advocate this thread continuing down this road.

[citadela01]

That would be if someone were to say, for example --

Don't worry FS, if you just tell them you aren't hostile, perhaps pyro will wave them and save you!

:p

Honestly, I don't know why you guys didn't anticipate this? I've expected it since the WD.

Who says we didnt ?