Why are you telling me all this stuff about you&Emeriti? It's a metaphore or something?
You presumed that that was our final form? We have the Coss now, my friend with a weird name. He performs miracles with utopian provinces. Miracles!
Were you in CR's leadership in this last war?
I thought my post was pretty clear. I don't think you read it right or it's late or you're drunk or something.Originally Posted by TheRealBazinga
But to answer your question, I did manage to sit the monarch's prov for a bit then I set my main prov as Steward so no one could question my authority. I then used the monarch message to rail on FAKE NEWS and singled out those who questioned my rule. I had the biggest crowd size in the history of crowds and I won the monarch vote by the largest margin of all time. Then I pledged to MAKE CR GREAT AGAIN. Unfortunately, sitting ran out and now we're back to no fun monarch.
Still, it's hard to consider my role leadership when I can't change bot orders and can't join council chan. Your question is tough to answer with layers of nuance.
And if you don't have a right foot? (New triggered segment, BoH explains expressions)
Which part are you refuting? Just because someone bullied you doesn't mean all actions against them are fair and just simply because you got your feels hurt. Your bias sounds like a child on the playground.
Im glad the over arcing point I made has been gotten but I hope some of the finer details didn't go unnoticed.
"The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)
@the guy with a weird name
You are weird, in a weird way. You keep using bombastic words and complicated sentences. Use simple words, english is not my first language and my translator (Maximo) is sleeping.
I want to question some of CR's tactical decisions made in these 2 wars. You keep maintaining a "pro" voice, without really being a pro. I think everybody can see that.
Can you call/message somebody from CR who can talk tactics? Do they allow you that?
"Bombastic" is a bigger word than anything I've used.
Either way, I apologize. It seems your combination of not speaking english with my train of thought gibberish doesn't seem to mix well.
<locs in image>
your fresh core was in perfect shape for our orcs what can I say... if we add ur BIG bank 40k elites into the eccuation it would become a total fiesta :)
I say u stop finding lame excuses for hitting us in a legit war. We didnt dodge you.. we got waved by ur "land farm" so there is nothing else to say except: YOU RAZED INTO A LEGIT WAR and wanna get away from it with talks and BS like allways. Well, got news for u (and its not specualtions) - u wont get away with it annymore... end of story.
Last edited by Palem; 22-02-2017 at 00:21.
@the guy with the weirdest name
Perfect! Now that you understood, can you please be kind and leave this thread? You intoxicated it enough with pseudo-informations and non-tactics from non-existent conflicts.
Here we would like to discuss matters of significance, not "what will happen if you declare Emeriti" or "what would've happen if this conflict started in another way, your way". These are all either assumptions or speculations, without basis in reality.
Last edited by TheRealBazinga; 21-02-2017 at 23:48.
Crs, you interfered in a legit conversation with false proofs and photoshoped informations. You shall be punished for this!
What does intel from the end of the first war have anything to do with things? We're talking about when eowcf ended. Like, at least if you're going to pretend to make a salient point then have pertinent details. No one was 10k def when eowcf dropped. You honestly can't think people are this stupid.
This thread is about my kingdom, and I will post as I please. If you don't like it then block me. You haven't discussed anything of significance for 4 pages. I hold myself to the same standard as you apparently hold yourself. You're actually claiming you lost land and not accounting for ww bonus for lord knows what reason. At least have some basis in reality.
The arrogance of you people is insane. You benefited from your own cf screw up. We all make mistakes. You happened to benefit from yours. Using intel from different time periods or spouting rubbish doesn't change reality no matter how many times you say it.
Notice how I stopped replying to him several pages ago? He proved to be a Kellyanne even after I had accused him of being one. The Morning Joe and I stand united in not giving the attention these fiction fabricators so desperately want.
"The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)
@the guy with the weirdestest name ever
I haven't discussed anything significant? I presented facts! I narrated the story of the great war between Warseekers and Clash Royale from 2017. Like Morgan Freeman. Then i answered questions from third parties like a professional lawyer. The only complaints that i received are from a band of horses. Not important. They like to neigh a lot.
I presented the numbers. What we lost / what we gained. It remains that your kingdom made 100 razes on wsk. While wsk was in war. With a different kingdom. 100 razes of @17k acres.
Why do you keep talking about OUR bonus? What relevance brings to THIS discussion? That bonus cost you the second war?
You lost the second war because you came armed with a fork in a pistols conflict!
We had an angry Coss and an angry Crs with an angry kingdom behind them, ready to make sacrifices. You put against them several unprepared provinces (even if we had a war in the meantime) and several inactive provinces for this level. Your strategy in the second war was disastrous. Your strategy in the first war was also disastrous. You've lost 3 banks, guy with a weird name! How can you lose 3 banks? :)
Our arrogance? You were the ones razing in a legitimate war! 100 times! For over 17k acres!
And YOU notice OUR arrogance?
After all that you wrote in this thread, you call us arrogant? Re-read your "precious contributions to history". You'll notice an arrogance bigger than Mount Everest.
I'll help you as it follows:
"It's a shame the rest of the so called top kingdoms decided to the reward wsk for their own leadership's stupidity and greed."
"Instead Eastern European tears trumped basic logic"
"Oh and thanks coss for not using your army of romanian multis to raze our chained."
"We had our cfs in order because unlike you we aren't dumbasses."
"The fact of the matter is that our only mistake was not razing for more acres before your tears reached other kingdoms."
And you call us arrogant? :) Our leadership that you call "stupid, greedy, tearful, cheater, dumbass" made our kingdom stomp your kingdom (and leadership) like a bulldozer in a field of tulips. :)
For one miscalculated CF (that we considered a friendly CF, between friends, without terms because there aren't terms between friends) suddenly our leadership became stupid and dumbass. Our leadership destroyed CR's banks. Our stupid and dumb leadership took tens of thousands of acres from CR. Our leadership beat the crap out of CR. What does this say about CR's leadership? :)
As a conclusion, you continue to miss the big picture.
You concentrate too much on our kingdom.
You concentrate too much on small things that in the end, don't matter.
You are an arrogant human being without anything to sustain it.
You are destined to be a failure.
Always and forever.
I would say Bazinga had been very accurate in his post. I didn't see much acres gain when their war with clash ended. The only superior thing they got from the war is having bigger cows-3 of them. Other than that, they got their t/m and orc core , mostly becoming smaller. But that also benefit WSK because they get to do deeper chain on CR in Rd 2
CR started Round 2 with Wsk. Both roughly the same size. The main difference is CR is going into Round 2 without any cows vs CR cows at 20k, 20k, 25k. Guess they failed to realized that which put them into hell, facing a super uphill battle in the war. Basically, I would say CR had no chance of winning. In fact their high core provinces saturated at 7-9k acres are serving the role as farms for WSK cow.
End result, WSk walked away with an easy victory, having cows estimated at 25k, 25k, 30k in comparison to their first war whereby it is 3 cows vs 4 cows
The acres are a strawman argument. What WSK gained was time to in turn gain troops and WPA. They surrendered the first war because of impending loss of more cows. 25 Faes with off spec credits from WW + ToG vs orcs having to train specs instead of leets, and dwarves that were broken by CR's 9ks at start of WSK's war with their "former" friend. WSK got an easy win, because they ran in the middle of an ongoing war (their term as to why they wouldn't pay up the 30% acre ridiculousness).
If you go back and look at the questions the vocal members of WSK have intentionally not answered or deflected, you will see exactly where their guilt is. The argument is they gained advantage from their war with their "former" friend.
"The Utopian voice of reason" ~Ben (And he's an official moderator)
Perhaps you are right.
WSK claimed Clash is CR's chess due to giving CR acres before the first war.
Whereas, CR claimed Clash is WSK's chess because both get into war, thus buying more time to prep for second conflict with CR and which eventually wins.
Can we invite the so called CRs's former friend, Gurch aka Wingding to verify whose claim is right?
Next few questions which I feel that it is quite important and should be settled before any 3rd war
1) 30% acres for winner of first war-who give who?
2) CR supposed return WSK 17k acres which they razed into war (done?)
3) Spartans to return CR the acres for breaking CF deal and waving CR (done?)
Don't apologize. This is becoming the best part. And @ TRB just keep it coming. Most people in my life communicate by the phrase "yknow what I'm sayin'".
love that thick mahogany back with no belly carve or anything...pure thick wood ! The thing ROCK is made of !
________
Weed bowls
http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=...+say&FORM=VDRE
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote