FREE vs SPARTANS - war in OOP

[Uhm hoi]

The war did not start out as an equal fight. They got a full wave extra, managing to chain attackers long before we could respond. Fight was over when Greeks exploited a small misunderstanding. It was never a fair fight.

War deal was made on equal acres and them getting an advantage because of your mistakes and your dealbreak. When the wardeal was made it would've been a fair fight if only free had kept their promisses.

You seem to have forgotten the essense of every war game. You want to take your enemy unprepared, that's what separates the skilled from the unskilled.

I suppose you've never played chess before? Or age of empires? Command and conquer? Risk? You aren't familiar with any game where you start out with roughly the same stuff and have to gain the upperhand during the game through strategy? I think there are a lot more strategy games where players or teams start out equal, instead of one side just starting with 20% more of everything. I've never seen a serious game of chess where one side had to play without it's queen from the start. But in your world, if we were to play a game of chess where you start without a queen and I manage to beat you, that makes me the far more skilled chess player? I had the extra queen, but that just makes me skilled and you unskilled, right?

The thing is, Greeks think they finally got peace. Instead, they created the monster of their dreams. I would call that moronic. Fair is a word lost for me when ppl treat me badly.

So, a leader in free threatens spartans. Spartans take countermeasures to the threats. Now you threaten them again, but the threats before the countermeasures shouldnt be taken seriously even though made by a leader but the new threats should cause spartans came prepared and now the threats are made by a kd member? Am I understanding this correctly? Maybe free should work a bit on how to send a clear message from the start, this is just confusing AF.