Rate My History Page

[silent_killer]

To each its own. You are in a nw whoring KD and spend good part of the age runing low draft and superb economy. Its inevitabele your bpa will be superior, let alone your book number.
I am in a warring kd and spend most of the age in full war build with science turned off during wars.

My choice is not aplicable in your situation and vice versa. Since you are already aware of the diferences in the circumstances I fail to see whats the point of your post ther than to throw word "ghetto" out there ?

we played half an age last age and won 7 wars with only 15 provinces so warring ghetto is boring as hell no challenge

[citadela01]

we played half an age last age and won 7 wars with only 15 provinces so warring ghetto is boring as hell no challenge

I play in 25 ppl kd in mid/low top 50 range, where the most warring kd's are. Not the best kd out there but not the worst, and we dont pick on inferior oponents.
Thats not the point tho. I spend half the age in hostily/war/eow cycles, and inbetween wars most of the time I am in full war build with draft ranging into 70+ ready to war w/o 48 hours notice.
Runing learns and using income to retrain losses is by far superior to actually paying science in my case.

You are aware of this. So once again I fail to see whats the point of your post ther than to throw word "ghetto" out there ?

[Godly]

octobrev, there are two types of utopians:

Those who respect Godly (top players)

and those who talk trash to Godly ( people who haven't reached top 100 in island)



LOL

[silent_killer]

that is statement is quite true, octo top 20 player as we speak

[Nobody]

I talk trash to godly, and I'm in the top 100.
I do not respect godly, and I'm in the top-ish
I'm in a middle-range warring kingdom.
cest-la-vie

@ octo
you hit chains a lot eh ? No worries, I'm the same way.. I usually only hit the chains, and never early on.
But, there is a difference in play between growth styles kingdoms (yours) and heavy warring kingdoms (mine). But everyone knows this.
Your prov is looking good atm tho.

@ Citadela
have we warred this age ? I mean, we usually only target kingdoms slightly larger than us, or equivalent NW with 25 provs ourselves. You, yourself do not seem familiar to me though... so it is possible we haven't crossed armies this age. (btw, I'm relatively easy to find, just look at the elves on rankings, can't miss me)

[Godly]

lOL nOBODY tHINKS top 100 iSLAND iS an aCHIEVEMENT lOLOLOL

[KuhaN]

Godly is jokes imo.

[fuzzy|]

says the person who quotes him in his sig ;)

[octobrev]

@ octo
you hit chains a lot eh ? No worries, I'm the same way.. I usually only hit the chains, and never early on.
But, there is a difference in play between growth styles kingdoms (yours) and heavy warring kingdoms (mine). But everyone knows this.
Your prov is looking good atm tho.

I don't really consider chaining to be fair play since it's not really beneficial in war and it's only used to ruin players' ages.
You're absolutely correct that there's a difference! Though their strategies are quite random, practice-warring kingdoms play a vital part in the hierarchy of utopia. They adhere to a sort of aggressive, warrior paradigm instilled in them by the media and release large amounts of endorphins when they manage to make a kingdom "withdraw" from war stance. You'll generally see them using magic and thievery ops, massacres, homes, chaining, and other silly things they believe to be of benefit since they have a symbolic relation to the paradigm. In war, they decide which kingdom is "better" by counting up the acres that they gained or lost. Although the gain is, in most cases, lower than what they could had accomplished simply paradising, they get pretty stoked over it. These kingdoms, through their aggressive play, instill morals on future top players such as activity, basic province management, and teamwork. Once a player is deemed worthy of a spot in a top kd, all we need to do is actually teach him how to play through i.e. game mechanics and simple logic.

[Nobody]

@ Octo
nature, i guess.. some people are more prone to "violent tactics" than others. Either style of play is fine for me, as long as I can play at my leisure. And to be frankly honest, I don't give a crap if we win, or loose, I just log in, do whatever it is I'm supposed to.. or feel like at the time, and then go about my day.

Of course, playing through game mechanics in which a kingdom uses war protection in order to keep other kingdoms from interrupting their chosen path is always good for someone.

@ Godly
you know, I didn't bother to check where I'm at for my Island... maybe I should do that.....
I said top 100, I did not however, mention a specific category of the 3 that are available for the game as a whole.
Can you actually add to the topic at hand, or any real points, instead of player-bashing, and in general being a full blown idiot ?

[Lazy]

Highest Networth 265965
Highest Land Area 1602
Highest Honor 2225
Total Land Explored 284
Total Attacks Made 147
Total Wins 109
Wins Against Larger Opponents 36
Average Relative Opponent Networth 94%
Total Land Gained in Combat 8310
Attacks Suffered 121
Times Defeated 102
Total Land Lost in Combat 9302
Thievery Operations Attempted 2556
Successful Thievery Operations 1927
Spells Attempted 485
Successful Spells 391

Got chained last war so the land gained / land lost is out of wack. Little bit of dicing in there too

[brado]

lol, bad at what, not liking someone? I respond to who I choose to respond to, I don't care what anyone else thinks, especially you.

Eh no, bad at this game. And that is not an opinion, that is a fact which you continually verify with every forum post you make and every age you play. Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but I am.

[Palem]

And we're done.

If you guys want to go piss and moan like a bunch of 12 year olds, go do it on IRC. If you'd like to discuss things and contribute to topics, you're more than welcomed to keep posting.