Ordray man you know , i just cant sit and do the math for you guys, youve been doing math for years, and math is math and numbers and numbers, but really what you call tiny ghettos , we beated up the best ghettos out of the top 100 . Maybe for you its not a big deal, but im sure that any kd outside the top 100 would love to be able to beat on eveyrone around them with a kingdom that was newly formed out of scratch, without having to wait several ages before achieving this success .
Right from scratch, newly formed kd, almost no one knows each other, and bam 5 war wins one age, and BAM 7 war wins next age.
I have to say that from the ppl that started the kd in age 49, half kd defected after 2 failed wars, and after that the superior players that stayed and strategies gave 5 war wins, and next age again some quit some stayed, half kd was new again, and new ppl came in the age and some left and there was a flow of ppl that you would not believe. its not like it was the same 15 players in both ages, i think the only players that were always the same was around 7 , so for a newly formed kd, to win 13 war wins straight, i think thats a pretty damn good accomplishment.
So you can try to undermine the wars and the victories but again i tell you, any kd outside top 100 can only dream about getting 7 wins in a row let alone 13 , This is ownization and domination, this is the epitome of ubberness, the pinnacle of masterization of all that is ubber and the pain and destruction superior skills, player focus into doom and damnation come together and result VICTORy One after another, VICTORY I GIVE YOU VICTORY
Im sure everyone outside the top 100 would love to have 7 war wins in a row in a single age, and 13 in a row in 2 ages, thats 13 war wins in a row for a kingdom outside the top 100.
I think again you are mixing terms , because you think for reasons i have previously pointed out, that you have an idea of what is being good and what is being better, that is fixated in your mind, this is nothing but a thought .
