Page 29 of 55 FirstFirst ... 19272829303139 ... LastLast
Results 421 to 435 of 815

Thread: New Anticheat Measure Going Live Today

  1. #421
    Post Fiend ElusiveWitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    118
    I don't know...scan a bill/piece of mail into computer and email it in showing two names at same address or do what they do to verify the babysitting. Oh wait...they don't verify that do they? Go figure...next point?

  2. #422
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    18
    @ Bishop

    Palem and I have discussed a time limit a page or so back. Have you guys looked into that? If it is a possibility, what kind of time frame would we be looking into that before it could be implemented? It is a very fair and honest solution to this crisis for most. I'm not freaking out like the rest, I have asked politely for a good solution to keep myself and Nancy from being split up.

    Thank you.

    That would make life a little easier to Nancy and I to play in the same kingdom but still deal with the restrictions.

  3. #423
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,726
    Quote Originally Posted by ElusiveWitch View Post
    I don't know...scan a bill/piece of mail into computer and email it in showing two names at same address or do what they do to verify the babysitting. Oh wait...they don't verify that do they? Go figure...next point?
    go start a ****ing suggestion thread about why Sitting should be changed/removed.

    using sitting as an arguement that the whitelist should be allowed is retarded. you seem to be obsessed with it, and while its related, its not whats being discussed. Making sarcastic comments about how babysitting feature is broken isnt accomplishing anything for you. If you havent figured that out by now hopefully you will hear me out on it. If you want something changed, go make a well thought out post in the suggestions forum, complete with your "suggestion"!!!

    quit *****ing tho its just annoying

  4. #424
    Post Fiend ElusiveWitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by DDodge View Post
    go start a ****ing suggestion thread about why Sitting should be changed/removed.

    using sitting as an arguement that the whitelist should be allowed is retarded. you seem to be obsessed with it, and while its related, its not whats being discussed. Making sarcastic comments about how babysitting feature is broken isnt accomplishing anything for you. If you havent figured that out by now hopefully you will hear me out on it. If you want something changed, go make a well thought out post in the suggestions forum, complete with your "suggestion"!!!

    quit *****ing tho its just annoying

    Oh my, a little touchy are we? Its only **tch*** because YOU dont agree with it. Its a very valid comparison. Pay $10 you can run a multi, use a free address you can't do this, you can't do that. Truth hurts huh or maybe its you have someone in your kd that pays to play?

  5. #425
    Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by DDodge View Post
    go start a ****ing suggestion thread about why Sitting should be changed/removed.

    using sitting as an arguement that the whitelist should be allowed is retarded. you seem to be obsessed with it, and while its related, its not whats being discussed. Making sarcastic comments about how babysitting feature is broken isnt accomplishing anything for you. If you havent figured that out by now hopefully you will hear me out on it. If you want something changed, go make a well thought out post in the suggestions forum, complete with your "suggestion"!!!

    quit *****ing tho its just annoying
    Talk about a double standard....

    There is no way to verify that whitelisted accounts are being played by two different people that I know of. But what I am arguing about is this system penalizes the honest player and not the cheater. I wouldn't even know where to begin to get around this IP cheat catcher but I would be willing to bet that a guy who is cheating has already figured it out.

    All I wanted when I started playing this game again was to be able to have some fun in the SAME kingdom with my daughter. Pretty simple isn't it? Whitelisting provided my daughter and me the opportunity to do just that. Before whitelisting we didn't play since we couldn't be in the same kingdom. I taught her how to play the game and basically got her hooked on it.

    So to summarize, this new system will in reality only effect the honest player.

    How do you stop someone from cheating? That question has been going on since the game started. This isn't the answer. How do you prove that you are an honest player with 2 people actually playing the accounts? I haven't got a clue and I'm sure you don't either.

  6. #426
    Post Fiend ElusiveWitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    118
    Joker, you are fighting a losing battle. It doesn't affect him like it does us so it he's all for it. Let something affect his kd and watch how loud he whines.

  7. #427
    I like to post Landro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    3,616
    Quote Originally Posted by ElusiveWitch View Post
    I don't know...scan a bill/piece of mail into computer and email it in showing two names at same address or do what they do to verify the babysitting. Oh wait...they don't verify that do they? Go figure...next point?
    This seems to be the at the heart of the issue. You might be able prove that there are actually two people living under the same roof and sharing an IP address but you can't prove who's accessing the accounts. Well ok, you could use camera observation but who has time to watch all of that? The solution chosen by the devs is terrible however and if it isn't disabled or at least changed, I fear that Utopia will lose some honest dedicated players over this. Many of those have invited the other to play and while they play in the same kingdom they often encourage each other to keep playing. Unless there is a big ad campaign going on, players inviting friends will remain the most important source of new players.
    This is my province. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    My province is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
    My province, without me, is useless. Without my province, I am useless.
    I must attack hard with my province. I must attack harder than my enemy who is trying to pk me. I must pk him before he pk's me. I will...

  8. #428
    Forum Fanatic khronosschoty's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,506
    Quote Originally Posted by DDodge View Post
    what do you suggest as a legit way of verifying a white list?
    I have no suggestions on how, at this moment. I can think, however, of some basic steps to stop gross abuse: with out getting rid of basic game functions: you can stop scripted attacks. The power in mass multiple accounts lies in scripting. It would be easy to detect a kingdom full of multiple accounts. In short: I cannot think of any solutions for small scale cheating, I can however, think of ways to stop mass cheating.

    Edit: and I think I should re-point out that the new system, and, the old systems, as they have been shown to me -- do not stop small scale cheating. I think that any solution against cheating that black lists basic game functions is bad, and, self destructive.
    Last edited by khronosschoty; 04-12-2011 at 23:13.

  9. #429
    Post Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,726
    ...
    Last edited by DHaran; 06-12-2011 at 14:34. Reason: Language and Personal Attacks

  10. #430
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    581
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    Actually the devs think the best of everyone.
    Actions, bishop, speak louder than words. Your words fall on deaf ears when the actions are the exact opposite. Think on it. How can they think the best of everyone and give preventative measures? They ensure we follow their rules, knowing if they didn't we still will? Why do it then, if they think the best of everyone? Actions, not words.

  11. #431
    Regular
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    55
    Quote Originally Posted by DDodge View Post
    Joker I hope you and your daughter can still enjoy this game, or if not find something equally stimulating to share together. All the best my man. Sorry Ewitch kept tossing her **** around in our discussion and taking away from it
    You can't enjoy the game with these restrictions and play together. I have deleted my account and so has my daughter.

    If they won't allow us to play together in the same KD fairly with the same advantages you have as a "solo" player, it just isn't worth it.

    The main reason I even posted was to try and get some people to open their eyes to what this does. It isn't as simple as catching cheaters. The big picture is that you take away from people that like the game and played by the rules.

    I could easily play the game again myself but it doesn't have the same appeal without my daughter in the KD. It was a lot of fun for both of us. Her learning to play and me teaching. Now, two won't play again unless someone comes up with a way to really stop cheating which is IMO a pipe dream.

  12. #432
    Post Fiend ElusiveWitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    118
    Quote Originally Posted by DDodge View Post
    This is why ur so dumb. If u created a suggestion thread to remove sitting, I would support it. You have no intelligence, its hilarious. Ur all hell-bent on attacking me for supporting sitting... Oddly, I don't. Having a debate with someone that can't comprehend what's being discussed isnt worth anyone's time, so u are cut.

    A 24 hour break from these forums sounds like a blast at this point, so on that note... ElusiveWitch you are a completely useless twat.

    Joker I hope you and your daughter can still enjoy this game, or if not find something equally stimulating to share together. All the best my man. Sorry Ewitch kept tossing her **** around in our discussion and taking away from it
    Actually if you had any reading comprehension every thing I said was relevant. I don't have a problem with sitting. I was only using it to show how absurd and useless this new "anti cheating" program is. Sorry you haven't learned to compare/contrast things and have to insult people when you don't agree or maybe its you just don't comprehend.

  13. #433
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    535
    I cba to read this thread or whatever people are saying cuz its so long but I do have 1 thing to add....

    Why are people crying about cheaters? Is there some problem with scripted multi attacks or something that I'm not aware of? Cheating wasn't even a problem in the 20's when all of the top kingdoms were always at risk of getting 5+ deletions if any oldschool trade went awry. Not a big enough problem to ruin the game anyways, but now? LOL cheating not a problem now. I see this as wasted time and effort by our devs and I'm not surprised, they've never shown too much intelligence when it comes to the changes they are implementing.

    Long Story Short: game is already dead and your worried about cheating? lol

  14. #434
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    120
    soo what about the people that only have one isp option? are we ****ed?

  15. #435
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    28
    29 page thread and not a single person (unless I'm mistaken; I've read every post, but I might have missed something) has brought up that a province can only be sat for 3 weeks TOTAL in a given age.

    "To prevent abuse, province sitting must last for at least 3 days, but for no more than 3 weeks in total in a given age."

    I'm divided about other issues discussed in this thread, but I would like to point out to anyone who has said province sitting is a pay-to-win advantage, a legal, but paid version of multi-ing, etc.: you're wrong.

    If a province can only be sat for 3 weeks, what are you going to do for the rest of the age? Then a sat province is only useful as a farm. But then remember you can only sit a province in your own kd and it's not really an advantage to waste one of your 25 provs on a small farm that has to be restarted every 3 weeks since it can't be sat for longer than that. And if the devs really wanted to prevent farming of the sat prov, you could easily just put in a block so that provs in the same kd as the sat prov cannot steal from, plunder or TM the sat province; only raze it to kill it (so as to not interfere with killing off inactives).

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •