That is the case for ANY cow in a war. They overstepped their bounds. If they have a problem with cows getting free acres they need to change war mechanics. Unrelated issue really. The issue is this war was not fake, and they are calling it fake.Originally Posted by Landro
S E C R E T S
Could you point to where Bishop said that this province was deleted because of FW?
This is my province. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
My province is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
My province, without me, is useless. Without my province, I am useless.
I must attack hard with my province. I must attack harder than my enemy who is trying to pk me. I must pk him before he pk's me. I will...
Man, sometimes i miss Mehul, he wouldnt have this close contact with the players of utopia and just ignored the whining bunch. If he wrote something he would write something witty and close a thread. Bishop is too soft!
Did you ever stop to think that maybe your king was the problem instead of the solution to finding a war ? That just maybe you're being played by a guy who puts his personal achievement before that of the kingdom ? No ?
+1000 to bishop for laying down the line!
Well that was a waste of my time, can you read the thread next time?<Bishop> saying" war me and we can both farm our kds and not attack each other" - thats fake
S E C R E T S
you know its bad when I'm the voice of reason
The End of an Era
True dat.you know its bad when I'm the voice of reason
how long were they in war for before deleted? 18 hours?
Only the 4th quote links this province to FW. The other quotes are just general statements.
This is my province. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
My province is my best friend. It is my life. I must master it as I must master my life.
My province, without me, is useless. Without my province, I am useless.
I must attack hard with my province. I must attack harder than my enemy who is trying to pk me. I must pk him before he pk's me. I will...
General statements about the province after which this thread was named being deleted. What good is this nitpicking doing? He was deleted for FWing during a war that wasn't fake.
S E C R E T S
we were in war around 2 days before it
So being in war for around 2 days means the devs know that you plan to whore land in war until EoA. Since it was deemed a fake war because they knew the provinces in question were going to whore land and reach, in one instance, #1 spot in land from #2 spot in land. It would need an EoA war for this, wouldn't it? There was no question at all that one kd or another would withdraw, because the devs KNEW it was a fake war for whoring land, regardless of hindsight that one kd withdrew since they were rather beat up and were going to take more of a pounding -> with or without the land whoring fake war going on.
I dunno, seems rather biased decision with lack of thought going on.
Definition: Decisiveness means that you are able to make good decisions without delay. Get all the facts and weight them against each other. By acting calmly and quickly, you should arrive at a sound decision. You announce your decisions in a clear, firm, professional manner.
I feel that there is a lack of Decisiveness going on, when I'm presented with the facts. Bishop says it's obvious that he's right that it was a fake war and deletions for the win, but to me it seems a lack of decisiveness, mainly a lack of a good decision due to lack of comprehension of the facts. The lack of comprehension, to me, based off of Bishop's vague responses, seems to be due to bais and lack of thought, and not lack of facts. However, that's assuming Bishop did the deleting.
[edit]
thinking some more on it, if their reasoning was influenced that no ops were done on either bank, that means in 50% of the wars I've had vs banks, those banks should have been deleted due to it being a fake war for them in particular. All this action means is that in all wars involving a bank, I'll simply report it due to suspicion of a fake war, as that bank has an easy potential to grow land -> whether he is using it or not (eg. Grande Mucca would have grown more by training up his offense to hit the other bank in his fake war where he was land whoring it up)
If they don't want banks in the game, shouldn't they just say they'll action banks? Or change the game mechanics, like how exploring works, so banks aren't plausible?
Last edited by Nuriho; 25-01-2012 at 18:26.
I wasn't aware you (and I mean 'you' in the same way you mean 'we') had a dog in that fight...
I can grow just as safely OOW. Though I grow (-100) to 200 acres faster per day in war assuming no LL. If this was solely for personal benefit I'd have gotten us a war with a much bigger kd / built more barracks and never withdrew while growing 600a/day faster than being oow.
Last edited by I_am_Spartacus; 25-01-2012 at 20:26.
Indeed, if it was simply 'abusing war to grow safely' then the #7 prov Crazy Diamond would probably be deleted too for being in a war that more or less amounts to him farming out a ghetto while enjoying war protection. That's okay though, they don't have a bank, and opportunism is a virtue. That and he's not in a position to challenge anyone for first place...
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote