In one thread your pulling the innocent card because you couldn't break him. Now you're playing the "I was bluffing" card.
One or the other.
In one thread your pulling the innocent card because you couldn't break him. Now you're playing the "I was bluffing" card.
One or the other.
Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |PM DavidC for test server access
Which rule am I encouraging him to break? Is warring not allowed anymore?Encouraging people to break the games rules is actionable.
http://wiki.utopia-game.com/index.php?title=Game_Rules
Stop squirming.
Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |PM DavidC for test server access
Using clear and well known rules as an example of how to break an unclear and unknown rule is fail. FW and prov NAPs are not the same thing and never have been. Feel free to announce that prov NAPs are now considered a FW, prior to this they weren't, then you have the precedent for deletions.
S E C R E T S
I guess there is reason why my question won't get an answer. There is none that would make sense.
Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |PM DavidC for test server access
Yawn, nn folks.
Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |PM DavidC for test server access
If that is indeed Ryan's exact message, I still don't see anything about breaking rules in there. He is agreeing to not do something that he can't do anyway, so how is that a problem? Nothing about this will ever make sense to me, because there is no sense behind it. So you have an agreement to not do something that is already not possible and not in the interest of either of them, and you have a war that without that agreement would be viewed as legal.Interested in a war? It could be beneficial for both of us... I'll agree to not hit you and then we're both free to bottomfeed and grow while our kds duke it out ;)
I must still be missing something.
Both were hitting the enemy provinces they could break. You entire case is flawed from top to bottom.
Last edited by DHaran; 26-01-2012 at 20:58.
S E C R E T S
Well, my point here is that they would acknowledge the error made here and do better in the future. To me that's all that matters now. To me this whole thing is beginning to look like "Hey, it's our game, we are the tyrants here and we do things simple because we can and don't care what community things of it." It's quite sad since this game is much about the community after all..
Some wise man once said "Everybody make mistakes, but those who learn from them are better for it" Admission of ones mistakes is a virtue.
Until this point, everything I can recall has pointed to game mechanic abuse being subject to suspension and account abuse (xlog, multi) being subject to deletion. Vacation mode abuse is pretty similar to FW abuse, yet all of those have resulted only in suspensions. Why was this case subject to immediate deletion?
We should set a standard for how abuses get handled, not decide on the spot which way to go.
S E C R E T S
You don't need to be sorry Astarael. I don't see it as your fault.
You used the war for protection, but according to Golden Maw, you guys were actively looking for war.
The protection is just a bonus for warring. For example, if a kingdom has double hostility and enters war with 1, they get protection against the other.
That's normal and if you are actively participating, then it's not a fake war.
You used the war to farm? Well, making no attacks at all would be more considered a fake war.
You participated in the war, hitting the chaintarget. The growth is natural.
It is grande muccas offer that caused your deletion.
You can't break him and as an orc, I doubt you could do any ops. So the agreement has no impact on your waractions at all.
The only thing is, would you have gone into war with him without the deal? Because that's what it's all about, to be able to grow with zero risks in this war.
But you were amazed by the wargains, right? So you would have thought grande mucca was out of range to serious hurt you anyway.
That means the deal only played a small role into entering war with them. (my assumption)
And not to mention he could have broken the agreement afterall, backstabbing like some people said. And it was a 2 province nap, so their t/ms can really hurt you.
So that was in noway a zero risks free to grow situation for you.
And ultimately you got deleted because of accepting someones waroffer. Tricked into war? More like tricked into death.
I guess you are pretty new to this game and to be the first deleted for something this grey under fake war is sad.
Hope you won't quit the game though.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)