Sleeper kingdom for Age 53: Inzzolence

[protector]

Beginning of age Inzz went and waved HoH and took itself out of the race. It proceeded to lose that war.

There was never any talks about nr1, only about warring the top. Which is what we did.
Sure, if we had the intentions to fight for nr1, we could have just asked HoH, Sanc, Rage and who-ever else for a CF and most likely have had it arranged rather shortly.

I'm not going to claim powerplaying at all, but you can't denie that you had an easy ride all age, similair to HoH last age.
As for Sanctuary; sure, their notice was a bit of a grey area, but just as with Pulse they where probably surprised how much we where able to pump in a short time and they lost acres twice. (Three times if you include the earlier age wave)

[flogger]

I swear that one of these ages I will be closer than 20 islands away from kingdoms I want to wave, and not an island away from kingdoms that want to wave me. I mean it's gotta happen eventually, right?

[octobrev]

A combination of random provinces and money can make that happen

[KuhaN]

There was never any talks about nr1, only about warring the top. Which is what we did.
Sure, if we had the intentions to fight for nr1, we could have just asked HoH, Sanc, Rage and who-ever else for a CF and most likely have had it arranged rather shortly.

I'm not going to claim powerplaying at all, but you can't denie that you had an easy ride all age, similair to HoH last age.
As for Sanctuary; sure, their notice was a bit of a grey area, but just as with Pulse they where probably surprised how much we where able to pump in a short time and they lost acres twice. (Three times if you include the earlier age wave)

So let me get this straight... Your guys plan was to max gain for 48 hours then wd, against every top kd, and then claim you won all the wars because of more land gains? Is this what you mean by "warring top kds"? Nice. By your guys logic then, a kd like FS have actually lost a good amount of their wars... So you guys were never trying to crown at all in the first place? You just wanted to gain more land in wars from top kds? My mind has just exploded.

[hint]

I'm sure that the kds they warred felt very good about losing acres to them kuhan.

[KuhaN]

The top is so damn boring, i used to think being big was a simple seperation from kds warring other kds around their kd's skill level, but it is not. Being number 3 or 4 in size actually matters to people... sn0re.

[KuhaN]

I'm sure that the kds they warred felt very good about losing acres to them kuhan.

I didnt think a kd that knew they werent going to get nr 1 actually still cared about their kd size. The sanct war at the end is an exception u guys had tho, as they were going for bank crown, which i didnt know about earlier. Anyways, if thats what u guys enjoy doing, then kudos i guess lol.

[Mansoor]

For being a person that doesn't care about the top you sure do comment a lot. You wanna join a top kd? I heard Simians are recruiting....hihi, made me giggle when I wrote Simians as a top kd, game is weak now! Good luck getting war wins next age!

All talk about Inso being in title race for crown next age and leaders Wannes and Twisty, with minor respect to them, people forget master mind Prot. He deserves to be mentioned in leadership squad after all work organising the wars. in my opinion Prot and Twisty are the ones that got somewhat talent, Wannes is just good looking.

I love you bro!

[TerricK]

You guys up top just cry about every little thing you can get your grubby little nerdy hands on don't you?

[Militaryman]

Odd...when did someone so godly as godly need others to win. I smell a conspiracy... I think godly has mind controlled 24 ghetto newbs so in essence inzz is godly....

[protector]

So let me get this straight... Your guys plan was to max gain for 48 hours then wd, against every top kd, and then claim you won all the wars because of more land gains? Is this what you mean by "warring top kds"? Nice. By your guys logic then, a kd like FS have actually lost a good amount of their wars... So you guys were never trying to crown at all in the first place? You just wanted to gain more land in wars from top kds? My mind has just exploded.

Where do you get this 48h maxgaining and WD from?! First hostile vs Sanc lasted almost 3 days before they declared, and then another 2-2,5 war. Second time hostile lasted 1-1,5 days and war lasted for 4 days.
I can't remember how long our war with HoH was, but the war with Fury lasted for 3 days and the war with simians 4 or 5.

Warwin means nothing (you said this yourself). There is no proper reward for it to make it worthwhile fighting for. That said, winning a war has different defenitions and meanings for every kingdom. Some play for honor, others just to get that +1 on their KD page while others just play for fun or to take land.
We could stay small and war small kingdoms, but that doesn't give me any reward. I'd end up fighting kingdoms like yours and ruin their age before it even starts. I rather stay top10 and war kingdoms at similair activity levels.

I didnt think a kd that knew they werent going to get nr 1 actually still cared about their kd size. The sanct war at the end is an exception u guys had tho, as they were going for bank crown, which i didnt know about earlier. Anyways, if thats what u guys enjoy doing, then kudos i guess lol.

Look at it from the other sides also instead of tunnelvisioning it. When a kingdom plays for land (Sanctuary), why is it wrong to take what hurts them the most? If I would be aiming for nr1 and I'd loose acres in a war I'd be annoyed. I suppose this logic is too hard for you to understand though.
When your kingdom looses more land every day while your cow keeps growing, does not slay dragons, does not send (much) aid and even turtles, what other option would there be than a clear stearing for nr1 land prov?

[Realest]

Phlayre used to just kill me when I suggested withdrawing with 'more' gains. He was willing to give up half a wave to the enemy for the war win :(

[hint]

I didnt think a kd that knew they werent going to get nr 1 actually still cared about their kd size. The sanct war at the end is an exception u guys had tho, as they were going for bank crown, which i didnt know about earlier. Anyways, if thats what u guys enjoy doing, then kudos i guess lol.

Top plays for land, not war wins. Ofc a WW is nice, but for unlike most war kds, it itself is not the ultimate goal. Even KDs who have lost their shot for crown have too much egos in their leadership that they don't suddenly stop caring weather or not they get owned by an enemy, esp if one they consider to be inferior to them. Saying neither side would care about the outcome of some top5 war if neither side has no longer a realistic shot for crown is in most cases wrong. People have their egos and pride, and often the outcome effects 3rdy party allied kds as well. And no, I Don't play in Inzzo.

[Realest]

Jokes aside, my personal opinion is that I always liked getting the WW, since I was always gonna be up in acreage anyway. Getting the WW doesnt allow your enemy to dispute anything - you're up acres, you got the WW - so your enemy got owned. It has a bigger psychological effect than 5K acres when you're both 150+K acres.

Then again, its only up for debate when you withdraw and barely go up in gains. If you withdraw, it better look good on the paper gains, or it kinda looks silly. Im a big believer of reputation.

[protector]

Jokes aside, my personal opinion is that I always liked getting the WW, since I was always gonna be up in acreage anyway. Getting the WW doesnt allow your enemy to dispute anything - you're up acres, you got the WW - so your enemy got owned. It has a bigger psychological effect than 5K acres when you're both 150+K acres.

Then again, its only up for debate when you withdraw and barely go up in gains. If you withdraw, it better look good on the paper gains, or it kinda looks silly. Im a big believer of reputation.

I suppose +35k and taking away Sanc's chance on prov crown seems rewarding enough to WD? ;)