They never stayed this way and they will never will.. why even bother discuss them now when they will annyway change? :P
They never stayed this way and they will never will.. why even bother discuss them now when they will annyway change? :P
So legit question: at what point do stables become useless?
Why hasnt this thread die off yet?
Dont get me wrong, just curious. On a sidenote, I am helping you keeping this thread alive, isnt so? So yes, back to the question.
because I give great help and I know what I'm talking about.
Montreal smoked meat or Philadelphia cheese steak?
As it stands, which race combo would be ideal core for a non whoring, full time warring kingdom?
So, hope this isn't an annoying question:
Most people tend to take offense offense offense as the way to go, and clearly attacking is the only way to war; however, i know a lot of the peeps in your KD(and other past successful war kd's) like using more defensive race/pers (/6 dspec, semi-turtle capability, cs or reflect magic) who work better in a max gain situation(have inherent ambush defense and can be aided into ub easier). Obviously it's all situational, but I was wondering if you thought there was an inherent mechanical preference within the game given to offensive attackers(few losses, high gains, high offensive leet ect.) v. semi-defensive attackers. Not really looking for a yes or no as much as the types of things you would look at to compare them, and to see if i'm missing things in thinking about their utilities in war and oow. Also wanted to see how you would compare the different strats in light of which race/pers will likely be selected at start of age due to changes.
Thanks.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)