Page 42 of 59 FirstFirst ... 32404142434452 ... LastLast
Results 616 to 630 of 881

Thread: AMA vs sanct round 2

  1. #616
    Forum Fanatic gergnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,525
    there will always be friends benefiting each other, be it an open alliance or just behind the curtains. people wont shuffle their allies =/= friends each age.

  2. #617
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    455
    Quote Originally Posted by Korp View Post
    Logic tells you when someone steal 100 million from you, you dont do anything
    Logic tells you to train thieves if you don't want gc stolen
    Beauty of Absalom->Redemption of Absalom->Trinity of Absalom
    Acres->Infinity->Havoc of Absalom->Cromulent Republic
    7x crown winner. Genesis Tripple Crown. 3rd largest nw prov in history of game.

  3. #618
    Forum Fanatic Elldallan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Proteus View Post
    You doubled Rage in age 51 because you couldn't win 1vs1 either. You also couldn't win 2v1 as you still lost inspite of having 2 kingdoms fighting us. You act like this never happens to Abs kds.
    As I remember those events Elit didn't doublehostile Rage, Elit had legitimate conflict with Rage and BIO decided to go **** **** up for Rage because they had done something to BIO earlier that war. Elit then refused to halt hostilities with Rage because after all he wasn't the one who was interfering and couldn't let Rage take BIO to war and beat them. So Elit is not the one to blame there, BIO is but yes it was completely lame of BIO to interfere in that conflict.

    Quote Originally Posted by Winslow View Post
    If you think thats dirty guard14n you dont play this game long enough.
    You are correct of course, this isn't even remotely the most dirty stuff that's happened over the ages.
    But it's still dirty and it's clear that Abs planned this all along, they knew Sanct's actions would elicit a response(if there hadn't been a 0 thief prov they would simply have done something else)
    Sure it was incredibly stupid to have a 0 thief prov but anyone who thinks there won't be a reaction when the ally of someone just sending notice robs that prov is clearly not living in this world.
    Quote Originally Posted by Winslow View Post
    Abs aint the bad wolf here...
    Except that they are. It was obvious Elit would stomp Havoc completely considering what they had just done to Sanct despite Sanct having the superior war setup in Abs.
    Last edited by Elldallan; 18-04-2013 at 14:00.

  4. #619
    Veteran
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bulgaria
    Posts
    536
    Also by the time Havoc waved AMA, AMA and Sanctuary were ingame hostile (That means ingame when i choose sanctuary i can see hostile on relations). If that is not hostile... :D
    A Mother's advice - #forfun

  5. #620
    Regular
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    84
    Quote Originally Posted by guard14n View Post
    Mate i agree with u i just dont like the concept of ABS. Its ok to have friends but in this game its not a solution to create another abs. The solution is that every kd has to compete with everyone while getting different allies every age to achieve their goals. The core of the alliances part is broken leaving other kds on the scrubbed side of the coin.


    You do know that it kinda never has been this way in the whole history of utopia...there always have been alliances alot even back in the days.
    So there was a form in balance of that...Some fought abs some where create especially against abs and they didnt last...So its abs fault too still have the endurance to be around until this day?

    I have been in Echo and Spirit wich was merely a collaberation between other top kd's too make a fist vs ABS...wich went well for awhile but they didnt last for that long for many reasons.
    Last edited by Winslow; 18-04-2013 at 14:37.

  6. #621
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    20
    Quote Originally Posted by Nick_mi View Post
    Logic tells you to train thieves if you don't want gc stolen
    Or go beg to anyone who steals you money saying. I have worked so hard to be biggest. plz dont steal my shinies

  7. #622
    Forum Fanatic Syntico's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,204
    You play with matches, you get burned.
    ∙ Shadowlight ∙ A Mothers Advice ∙ Force ∙ Pansies .

    Kingdom Crown Winner with Pansies, Brute Force, Sonata, Dreams
    Province Crown Winner with Brute Force


    ∙ Brute Force ∙ Playboys ∙. Sonata ∙ Dreams ∙ Retired .

  8. #623
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by guard14n View Post
    Hehehe nice so if the AT is 13h its not double hostile? Isnt it double hostile to go vs a kd who is actually hostile with someone else. Considering ama was hostile (fact) with sanc at that moment and havoc waving them = pure double hostile.
    As for the other thing u said someone doubled rage some time ago and u implied that its not just abs that double and harrass people. This will lead to the argument that u agree that in this perticular situation abs did intentionaly doubled ama to avoid direct conflict 1v1 just as dreams and bio did to rage few ages ago right ?

    I admire the passion u reject the facts :)
    did you cry much when Havoc waved you ? and i mean real crying cus we can all see your whining here.

  9. #624
    Post Fiend guard14n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Lykron View Post
    did you cry much when Havoc waved you ? and i mean real crying cus we can all see your whining here.
    Trolling like a baws huh :D Im not from AMA and i never played with Elit mate :D Im just an observer! :D

    Cry ... hehe :D

  10. #625
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by guard14n View Post
    Trolling like a baws huh :D Im not from AMA and i never played with Elit mate :D Im just an observer! :D

    Cry ... hehe :D
    nah it's just that you are so angry with abs that it's hard to believe it's not personal (especially when you curse them in several of your posts). you sounded really hurt when they waved ama so it's highly probable that you are not neutral.

    Quote Originally Posted by guard14n View Post
    Mate i agree with u i just dont like the concept of ABS. Its ok to have friends but in this game its not a solution to create another abs. The solution is that every kd has to compete with everyone while getting different allies every age to achieve their goals. The core of the alliances part is broken leaving other kds on the scrubbed side of the coin.
    so you agree with the concept of an alliance but you only accept it as long as they are temporary (1 age only). where does it say that the game is supposed to be that way ?
    Last edited by Lykron; 18-04-2013 at 15:05. Reason: grammar

  11. #626
    Post Fiend guard14n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Lykron View Post
    nah it's just that you are so angry with abs that it's hard to believe it's not personal (especially when you curse them in several of your posts). you sounded really hurt when they waved ama so it's highly probable that you are not neutral.



    so you agree with the concept of an alliance but you only accept it as long as they are temporary (1 age only). where does it say that the game is supposed to be that way ?
    Heh naah i just dont like abs :D Not the players (xpt may be ASF i dont like him :D) but the concept. As for the alliance part yes temorary is ok. And there was an interview few years bach with mehul - there he sais what the original concept of the game is. As far for the game - make some research: how many people we used to have 10 years ago, 5 years, 3 years, 2 years, 1 year ago and now? U can make a graph to see it better - back in during mehul there were tens of thousands of players and if my memory is right i recall i point we almost reached 100k. Now we are below 7k and huge part of those players are inactive or mults. There are a lot of factors to be this way but one of that factors is that ally system. This is a game of competition and as long as there is someone with this kind of an advantage it will always make some people quit. Thats the reason i dont like abs :D Cheers

  12. #627
    Forum Fanatic Elldallan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Syntico View Post
    Don't worry Elit, a storm is coming...
    No no, Winter ;)

  13. #628
    Strategy Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,226
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    As I remember those events Elit didn't doublehostile Rage, Elit had legitimate conflict with Rage and BIO decided to go **** **** up for Rage because they had done something to BIO earlier that war. Elit then refused to halt hostilities with Rage because after all he wasn't the one who was interfering and couldn't let Rage take BIO to war and beat them. So Elit is not the one to blame there, BIO is but yes it was completely lame of BIO to interfere in that conflict.
    Although you're technically correct here based on the order of hostile events alone, don't forget that disgruntled BIO players (3 total I believe) did come forward with information that the 2v1 was fully coordinated from the start and was actually supposed to involve a couple other kingdoms helping as well but they decided against it. Also don't forget that BIO didn't dare full wave us into the fight (due to button concerns) until they entered FW together with Elit.

  14. #629
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,010
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    As I remember those events Elit didn't doublehostile Rage, Elit had legitimate conflict with Rage and BIO decided to go **** **** up for Rage because they had done something to BIO earlier that war. Elit then refused to halt hostilities with Rage because after all he wasn't the one who was interfering and couldn't let Rage take BIO to war and beat them. So Elit is not the one to blame there, BIO is but yes it was completely lame of BIO to interfere in that conflict.


    You are correct of course, this isn't even remotely the most dirty stuff that's happened over the ages.
    But it's still dirty and it's clear that Abs planned this all along, they knew Sanct's actions would elicit a response(if there hadn't been a 0 thief prov they would simply have done something else)
    Sure it was incredibly stupid to have a 0 thief prov but anyone who thinks there won't be a reaction when the ally of someone just sending notice robs that prov is clearly not living in this world.

    Except that they are. It was obvious Elit would stomp Havoc completely considering what they had just done to Sanct despite Sanct having the superior war setup in Abs.

    If thats correct why did Elit agree to FW bio then? If they were not involved bio is that last kd elit would want to dw with even if he needed one to not get farmed. Going to FW with bio shows its coprdinated as it benefitted both kds. If you are trying to assert you are not coordinating with the 2nd party to a double hostile you would not do an action that directly benefits them. Furthermore when ASF asked elit to cf after double hostile, elit said he would need to "ask bio." Why would he need to ask someone to cf us thats part of a double on us if this situation is not coordinated. I have those logs.

  15. #630
    Post Fiend guard14n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    140
    Quote Originally Posted by Proteus View Post
    If thats correct why did Elit agree to FW bio then? If they were not involved bio is that last kd elit would want to dw with even if he needed one to not get farmed. Going to FW with bio shows its coprdinated as it benefitted both kds. If you are trying to assert you are not coordinating with the 2nd party to a double hostile you would not do an action that directly benefits them. Furthermore when ASF asked elit to cf after double hostile, elit said he would need to "ask bio." Why would he need to ask someone to cf us thats part of a double on us if this situation is not coordinated. I have those logs.
    Making excuses for the current situation i see :) Gj :P ABS pwnz :)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •