Evil Dragons...

[ofgortens]

You are full of it. I never said they were focusing on whoring, so you're clearly not reading or just lack basic English comprehension skills. You might have skipped a class in 2nd grade.
My whole premise is why would you WD (for land) if you are focusing on getting WWs? Clearly they are neither here nor there and making excuses for WDing.

Just because you are a 'warring kd' doesn't mean they are only after WW. I consider those similar but different. One can be an extreme warring kd but still WD when they are ahead in land / honor to move onto another war if the war looks to be drawn out. Just because they WD while they are ahead in land / honor doesn't mean they are now a whoring kd and not a warring kd.

Just an observation.

PS I'm in none of these kds so I really don't care about the conflicts other than seeing what's going on.

[Korp]

You are full of it. I never said they were focusing on whoring, so you're clearly not reading or just lack basic English comprehension skills. You might have skipped a class in 2nd grade.
My whole premise is why would you WD (for land) if you are focusing on getting WWs? Clearly they are neither here nor there and making excuses for WDing.

If you're not focused on warring what are you focused on then? While we're at it, if they're not focus on warring why are they then warring wouldnt seems rather weird to be a kingdom that isnt focused on warring wars. To me its quite obvious they were going to lose if they kept it going since they were fresh in the game again and havent followed the recent changes in warring (which they have mentioned several times in this thread as well) So to me it seems quite logical that they would withdraw when they still were somewhat + in gains. They are merely pointing out to people that they didnt get trashed that bad which people claim since they were + in the conflict. So, lets all agree that a kingdom that wars are focused on warring :)

[silverfox]

Geez, seems like bringing up history to brag right now. No longer hear the politics or war between BoB and ED... What about that issue on the random province hitting BoB 4 times and got scolded? I just think its a lie that he was scolded. :P That province is definitely being "province sit" by someone active/strong but not a noob. Deny?

What about him? He's a new player this age and has been great all age, but made a mistake. We're not going to kick someone because they screw up, I'm more interested where you guys are getting your trash info about who's being sat in our KD (I can take a guess and think it'd be a decent one too).

Sadly I don't have the logs of the amount of swearing and *****ing I did after logging in and finding out I had MS, but that was then and I'm over it.

<koko> sorry
<koko> for the unfriendly relation
<koko> i tought we could make 2 hit a day witouth problem

Maybe I just made all of that up and he's actually away though.. (I have edited his IRC name).

Once again silverfox tries to be smart by playing grammar teacher...don't have the care to put a nice neat little paragraph for your liking silverfox....I prefer this way as I got other stuff to do with my life...I see people complain about you guys all the time....anyway...drop some nw see how well you fair with us...stop trying outgrow us...also kds like you need allies. We do too its called 24 others in our kd we don't need a whole extra kingdom to win our crowns...its a shame you boast that you do..

Your post was just abject stupidity, you make claims about our provs being sat when they aren't and then start whining about how ED have no honour, for someone who has things to do in life you're actually extending the time you take to post by pressing . 3 times instead of 1 but I guess that's an irrelevant point.

Sorry, but who's complaining about us? I mean besides our little cheerleaders in strippers who queue up to make fools of themselves anytime we update this thread by just blindly following the anti-ED line.

But really there's no point discussing things with people like you, it just goes around in circles and gets nowhere as you take whatever you want things to mean from what's said. You make claims about ED and I explain to you that we've made a lot more friends through our wars and instead of taking that as it should be (that we're actually pretty nice to people who aren't jerks) you somehow twist it into bragging about alliances.

but you guys were so adamant about being the actual winners because you gained land.. why the change of heart and aiming for warring now?

I'm pretty sure I've said it multiple times in this thread (regardless of what other people in or out of ED might say) that we lost the war vs. Strippers, we took more land and honour while Strippers got the war win, for me that constitutes a loss. Even Parth has covered this so I'm not sure why you keep trying to cover topics which were covered months ago.

Yes I still believe that ED is a much better KD, losing a war doesn't make you a worse KD. By your logic you think Strippers are better than HoH & Rage since you got the war win off them, or does that not count because of the circumstances? Oh and PewPew must be better than Strippers because you surrendered to them, who cares if you were hit OOW because explaining circumstances is just excuses and no-one in Strippers cares that ED was OOW razed in a war vs. you.

Basically your logic is idiotic, you try and paint things as black and white with no middle ground, you won or lost irrelevant of the other factors, that to me makes your opinion not worth listening to. You try to paint it as a great victory for Strippers, but you lost land and honour in return for a war win, maybe I could see a reason for you bragging if you're wiped out 20% of our acres (like we did to you) AND won.

[Lestat]

English not your first language? I believe that sentence should start with a 'Why'?

You lose the internet

[Feint]

Are we submitting essay for competition. Try keep thing short and sweet. Thanks.

[Feint]

Can someone post the summary? BOB leading in acres gain... Wooha

[silverfox]

If you know who's doing what in acres can't you just post a summary yourself?

[Hunting]

He's to noob to make summary.

[Feint]

I was just guessing. Ya, I don't know how to do...

[Feint]

Ed having a fun time feeding on bob.
Hope you don't choke. What a way to end an age

[zmasternr1]

Ed having a fun time feeding on bob.
Hope you don't choke. What a way to end an age

I don't know what you try to prove. To my knowledge we haven't run into each other before.
Our diplo has been quite friendly and still you refuse to cf. You seem to be determined to lock us into an eoa conflict, relying on ****ty oow game mechanics to make it possible. For what purpose I wonder?

It's just Feint posting here anyway. They eat 50 massacres and retal with 15 trads. 1 min later he comes posting "hey we are ahead in acres". You behave like a small child

[Feint]

Haha. Ok. A child who reports only the facts. Am I wrong to say that bob is ahead in acres gained? Why u mad, bro?

[Feint]

I will be extremely careful with the 200 hostile points. 88-159 points at the moment.

[ofgortens]

you can always agree to war another kd and have them wave you and give you button... that way you can declare and relations would end with BoB. However, they still might be fine with hitting into your war considering they won't take any other of your CF options.

Never sure how to get out of these failed oow mechanics of retal warring. It's almost as bad for the game as the failed honor system.

[silverfox]

Haha. Ok. A child who reports only the facts. Am I wrong to say that bob is ahead in acres gained? Why u mad, bro?

51 Retal war only (XX:XX) Astel 42,840 acres

If you're so bothered about acres then why are you smaller than KDs who don't even have 25 provs? Neither KD is whoring so why would anyone care about a few hundred acres either way at this point?

To be fair I don't even know how to reply to you as just reading your last few posts in here is frankly embarrassing. I'm kind of at a loss to even work out BoB's position in this whole situation, what exactly were you thinking with 2 OP waves and 2 hits and refusing any CF options?

You clearly can't war us because you know you'll get farmed out, otherwise you'd push the button and take our honour and crown. You have nothing to gain from an EoA retal war as you're in #1 and are throwing away your chances of crowning by dragging out a conflict, which leads me to the only logical conclusion being that your leadership are utterly clueless and think this is a good trade off.

On one had you had:

- Around equal gains in sci (maybe you took more).
- Roughly the same honour and land exchange offer after we'd have made 3 hits & the honour gained through ops for you.
- A CF & option to war us later if you'd wanted.

Yet instead you chose an "EoA retal war" and ignoring people in ED msging you to try and find a resolution.

I don't even know if you'll make it this far as you have trouble reading from the looks of things, but to answer your other question yes I am actually having fun, until now the age has been boring as hell.

I'm just curious to find out why you've decided to pick a grudge with ED over 4 hits, especially when you wont war us.