If someone ever thought it would be one sided, I'd call them fools. I think we're going to win this, not cause of the NW gap, but cause we're a better kd. No need to flame ED for this, its just my very personal view. BoB has good activity and they have an easy to follow straight up strategy. I'd say we're more opportunistic in our strategy selection. Makes us a bit harder to read. In my view, you need to re-analyze the overall playing board quite often. We have shown BoB a few tricks, but our playbook contains a lot more yet.
Looking back, ofc we made a mistake in not protecting our TM's better...but if we had, maybe bob wouldnt have pushed the button?


Quote Originally Posted by MrCurious View Post
If you notice the way BoB is set up, they always keep their T/Ms small, to make them less interesting to chain / harder to chain due to having to hit down sending quite alot of offense in the process. That paired with a strong hitter force (undeads) make them difficult to war. They always chain enemy T/Ms first, while softening up fat hitters on the side - i have not seen them use a different strat. I wouldn't count BoB out of this yet, no disrespect for ED at all, but BoB are top feeding with ops + chains, and that usually generates a much higher damage output. Its no point in being 4k acres (ED) with no peasants and a NW that makes you have to hit way way down in NW when hitting/opping. I guess we see, but its not as onesided as portrayed. Again, no offense intended towards ED - i am just brainstorming without having any intel to back it up.