Quote Originally Posted by JustinSane View Post
First, didn't Elit a few pages back state that he hit SWEA pre-emptively based on the idea that SWEA would dealbreak anyway? If so, you have the chronology tangled up: certainly, you can't expect SWEA to still honor a deal even after you take a dump on it, can you? Furthermore, using your own rhetorics, you had already broken deals with others, giving SWEA little reason to consider theirs as valid anyway.

Second, you can't apply that definition on a game like Utopia where dishonest, "unfair" actions are key elements of the game. Again, I just have to refer to Elit to make that point more than clear enough.

So stfu =)



You can pretend that all you like, but again, I have seen the logs - both with regards to Rage and the post-SWEA debacle and Absalom as such. That said, I have nothing but respect for Drixx; while he may not yet be a very good leader, he - unlike propronub et co - comes across as a standup guy with potentially to actually turn the kingdom around. So in that sense, best of luck.

P.S. I never lost a war vs. Rage and never will. <3



Dear Propronub,

First, I never stated we single-handedly took out Absalom; in several places I, in fact, stated that we merely did one stab alongside others. That said, while I sadly have learned that our efforts to this noble end has not rendered the much desired outcome, I am at least happy to see Rage displaced from the charity pedestal upon which you have sat for far too long. As for the continued charade, we both know the truth so I see little point in even commenting on that.

Second, I don't think I ever argued that the acres were not donated; hence my comment: what could possibly top making your enemies carry you to the throne - particularly so given that they simultaneously sell out their former ally in the process.

Third, I have more credibility than you. <3

P.S. Just to entice your curiosity, last age your fellow alliances mates came and asked me to come in and help restore your beloved Absalom to its original 'beauty'. On several occasions, I might add. How do you like them Apples?



1: Joke or not - we did not break it. We never had to. Would we have? Maybe. Did we? No. So yes, I am certainly for real.
2: While we got 100k acres, we did not cheat while getting them. If my word is not good enough, ask Bishop - he cleared us from any wrong doing. What more could you possibly ask for than that?
3: Evidently, we outplayed everyone. As just noted, we even got enemies to turn against their friends to hand us the crown. If that isn't to outplay in an essentially social game, what is?
4: We won. You didn't. Ergo, we are better. Maybe you should go for the war chart instead, if you think that winning wars is what truly matters.

nuff said.
Wow you are a delusional n00b with a perverse version of reality that just parrots some bs that cannot be backed up by facts. Absalom and Rage has beat kds 100x better than Swea run by leaders 1000x better than you as you are an unknown nobody. Both kd/alliance have survived gang bangs when out numbered and i have personally won against kingdoms in a 1v2 situation where both the kds doubling us were better than swea. If you think your lame kd has even .01% to do with what happened with Abs you are sadly mistaken. Noobs like you want to appear good and important but you are biased as hell. When the same people lead the same kingdoms for years and years without break and always end t3, win crowns, dominate the competition it gets tiring and people quit the game. What happened was many top leaders/players quit during the last 2 ages and there was no one comparable in the pipeline to replace them. If you do not believe this then you show a complete disregard for all facts and just want to spin bull****. Record and history are against you. If anything you said was of any merit than Absalom would not be dominating the charts almost every age but be a one hitter like bio or warcry. Also another thing you don't acknowledge is consistency. Lets say your "win" was clean and there was no dealbreak, gb, or allied far out- its still 1 win, it doesn't make you better than kds who win all the time. When Federer or Nadal lose in the first round do any of the sports analysts say that random player is better than them? Do all the grand slams become invalid? No it's just noise. I remember I lost one time a few ages back, first war loss in 2 years but guess what I beat that same kingdom/leader 6x and lost 1x but I guess according to your logic they are better.

I'm done talking to people who are biased and ignore all facts to spew their own agenda.

If swea beats any good kingdom 1v1 in a fight this age i will be the first to admit you guys are good but I already feel a slew of excuses coming on that you will use to justify losing to better kingdoms like "we won last age it doesn't matter we aren't playing to win" if your good you will beat a kd like ama, bb, some former abs kd 1v1 in war this age. If you lose to all of these kingdoms then what everyone else already knows will be confirmed that you guys are a joke.

Also note how no one else but swea is coming in here saying you guys are good. Kinda tells you something doesnt it?