Page 17 of 35 FirstFirst ... 7151617181927 ... LastLast
Results 241 to 255 of 517

Thread: SWEA Vs Crownless AMA

  1. #241
    Forum Fanatic
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,010
    Swea win last age was a fluke based on dealbreaking and being farmed out to from friendly kds. Swea had a legit chance early age to prove they were good and deserve their crown by beating a top kd. Swea chose to wave ama and was farmed out completely, it was embarassing. If swea was any good theyd do well beyond just one age. You don't have to crown but least you can do is beat someone in a war, you failed. Now you will fade into being irrelevant.

    I don't know why Gegorth trolls either, all of his crowns are won by other people who lead the kd. Has he ever lead and won himself?

  2. #242
    Forum Fanatic gergnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,525
    Quote Originally Posted by Proteus View Post
    I don't know why Gegorth trolls either, all of his crowns are won by other people who lead the kd. Has he ever lead and won himself?
    people just like to have me around :) im just a nub.

  3. #243
    Post Demon DM_Benjamin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, QLD
    Posts
    1,816
    Ok guys, I've had enough of all this Elit bashing. I won't sit idly by anymore, keep this up and I'm dishing out bans.

    Elit has proven to be a outstanding individual and a trustworthy Utopian. If you take it back to the start of last age, he was what we all strive to be and I am confident he will overcome this minor setback and work well with allies in the future.
    Redwood Originals ~Lowriders for life

  4. #244
    Forum Fanatic Elldallan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    Pew pew were punished, no one took advantage of it though which was weird.
    48 hours of suspension and even that apparently didn't work as it was supposed to since pewpew sent out attacks the same instant they were oow, I know you stated before that it was some sort of bug in the suspension code relating to ppl being logged in when the suspension was activated so no need to explain that part again :).
    But 48h of suspension is barely even a slap on the wrist, especially since they were allowed to accomplish their goal, it might have been a suitable punishment for AMA or SWEA since they were still in the race for crown prior to the war but pewpew made it obvious that they had given up on land/nw when they attempted to farm out, and in case you make such a punishment you should probably inform the rest of the top that they won't be able to log for x hours to encourage people to hit them, otherwise it likely won't be noticed and all and it will just be 48h of forced inactivity.

    And if I remember the summaries from the 3v1 correctly I'm pretty sure AMA did take some advantage of it but considering that pewpew had already been thoroughly farmed I guess there wasn't much to take.
    Besides, unless there's some sort of announcement to the general population they won't know that there even was punishment dealt out. But then again, since they obviously didn't care about their acres so I fail to see how loosing acres is even a punishment in this case.

    The very least that should have been done was to reset pewpew & swea's acres to what they were at the start of war, thus denying the goal of pewpew's cheating. then pewpew should have been suspended until eoa or preferably deleted.
    You deleted Debauchery's ww's a few ages back because that was obviously their aim so you've proven that you're willing to tailor the response to thwart the cheaters, I just don't see why you didn't do so in this case.
    But then I don't have to worry about player retention which I'd guess is a pretty significant concern these days. And it's unlikely that not taking serious action against pewpew would make AMA players leave the game while deleting or suspending pewpew until eoa is far more likely to cause several of their people to leave the game.
    Last edited by Elldallan; 03-10-2013 at 01:54. Reason: minor edits

  5. #245
    007 licence to post Anri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    5,692
    Quote Originally Posted by Elit View Post
    Im sure Simians have more WWs from SWEA.



    I try but its not easy to escape from Planet on Apes!
    No planet or universe is big enough for your ego.
    #?

    #42

    #Pandas

    #Simians

    K L A
    Kaer Loche Alliance

    Real life of Anri - Utopia addict
    http://instagram.com/henke82

  6. #246
    Forum Fanatic gergnub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,525
    The high horse is reserved for elit and propro, fitting as they are in the same kingdom now :)

    the rest of us can ponder on our worthless utopian achievements and cry ourselves to sleep <3

  7. #247
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    48 hours of suspension and even that apparently didn't work as it was supposed to since pewpew sent out attacks the same instant they were oow, I know you stated before that it was some sort of bug in the suspension code relating to ppl being logged in when the suspension was activated so no need to explain that part again :).
    But 48h of suspension is barely even a slap on the wrist, especially since they were allowed to accomplish their goal, it might have been a suitable punishment for AMA or SWEA since they were still in the race for crown prior to the war but pewpew made it obvious that they had given up on land/nw when they attempted to farm out, and in case you make such a punishment you should probably inform the rest of the top that they won't be able to log for x hours to encourage people to hit them, otherwise it likely won't be noticed and all and it will just be 48h of forced inactivity.

    And if I remember the summaries from the 3v1 correctly I'm pretty sure AMA did take some advantage of it but considering that pewpew had already been thoroughly farmed I guess there wasn't much to take.
    Besides, unless there's some sort of announcement to the general population they won't know that there even was punishment dealt out. But then again, since they obviously didn't care about their acres so I fail to see how loosing acres is even a punishment in this case.

    The very least that should have been done was to reset pewpew & swea's acres to what they were at the start of war, thus denying the goal of pewpew's cheating. then pewpew should have been suspended until eoa or preferably deleted.
    You deleted Debauchery's ww's a few ages back because that was obviously their aim so you've proven that you're willing to tailor the response to thwart the cheaters, I just don't see why you didn't do so in this case.
    But then I don't have to worry about player retention which I'd guess is a pretty significant concern these days. And it's unlikely that not taking serious action against pewpew would make AMA players leave the game while deleting or suspending pewpew until eoa is far more likely to cause several of their people to leave the game.
    2 provs werent suspended properly but that was sorted. AMA razed into swea if i remember right, no one touched pew pew. Its not possible to reset provs to an arbitrary date :/ Apart from that, we wouldnt reset sweas acres.
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |
    PM DavidC for test server access

  8. #248
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    48 hours of suspension and even that apparently didn't work as it was supposed to since pewpew sent out attacks the same instant they were oow, I know you stated before that it was some sort of bug in the suspension code relating to ppl being logged in when the suspension was activated so no need to explain that part again :).
    But 48h of suspension is barely even a slap on the wrist, especially since they were allowed to accomplish their goal, it might have been a suitable punishment for AMA or SWEA since they were still in the race for crown prior to the war but pewpew made it obvious that they had given up on land/nw when they attempted to farm out, and in case you make such a punishment you should probably inform the rest of the top that they won't be able to log for x hours to encourage people to hit them, otherwise it likely won't be noticed and all and it will just be 48h of forced inactivity.

    And if I remember the summaries from the 3v1 correctly I'm pretty sure AMA did take some advantage of it but considering that pewpew had already been thoroughly farmed I guess there wasn't much to take.
    Besides, unless there's some sort of announcement to the general population they won't know that there even was punishment dealt out. But then again, since they obviously didn't care about their acres so I fail to see how loosing acres is even a punishment in this case.

    The very least that should have been done was to reset pewpew & swea's acres to what they were at the start of war, thus denying the goal of pewpew's cheating. then pewpew should have been suspended until eoa or preferably deleted.
    You deleted Debauchery's ww's a few ages back because that was obviously their aim so you've proven that you're willing to tailor the response to thwart the cheaters, I just don't see why you didn't do so in this case.
    But then I don't have to worry about player retention which I'd guess is a pretty significant concern these days. And it's unlikely that not taking serious action against pewpew would make AMA players leave the game while deleting or suspending pewpew until eoa is far more likely to cause several of their people to leave the game.
    2 provs werent suspended properly but that was sorted. AMA razed into swea if i remember right, no one touched pew pew. Its not possible to reset provs to an arbitrary date :/ Apart from that, we wouldnt reset sweas acres.
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |
    PM DavidC for test server access

  9. #249
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    The very least that should have been done was to reset pewpew & swea's acres to what they were at the start of war, thus denying the goal of pewpew's cheating. then pewpew should have been suspended until eoa or preferably deleted.
    You deleted Debauchery's ww's a few ages back because that was obviously their aim so you've proven that you're willing to tailor the response to thwart the cheaters, I just don't see why you didn't do so in this case.
    But then I don't have to worry about player retention which I'd guess is a pretty significant concern these days. And it's unlikely that not taking serious action against pewpew would make AMA players leave the game while deleting or suspending pewpew until eoa is far more likely to cause several of their people to leave the game.
    All AMA needed to do was to stay out, PewPew would have warred SWEA, and it would all be fine.
    Mods should never have interfered.
    The second AMA hit PewPew the situation outcome was easy to predict. You don't fight war on two fronts.

  10. #250
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    2 provs werent suspended properly but that was sorted. AMA razed into swea if i remember right, no one touched pew pew. Its not possible to reset provs to an arbitrary date :/ Apart from that, we wouldnt reset sweas acres.
    What of the decision to give SWEA eowcf protection after being pulled out of a war deemed fake/abuse in which they farmed 100k and did not take a single hit? Devine intervention?


    edit: To be fair, I doubt it was your call directly ... but you must understand why AMA players would be naturally indignant here.
    Last edited by ZodZilla; 03-10-2013 at 08:56.

  11. #251
    Forum Fanatic Elldallan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,018
    Quote Originally Posted by Lurking Ghost View Post
    All AMA needed to do was to stay out, CheatCheat would have warred SWEA, and it would all be fine.
    Mods should never have interfered.
    The second AMA hit CheatCheat the situation outcome was easy to predict. You don't fight war on two fronts.
    Abusing war & gb protection in the manner pewpew did is obviously abusing a mechanism in a way that is not intended, the mods should have and did act, unfortunately not harshly enough in my opinion.
    Besides, you cannot call that fighting a war or even fighting AMA from war, suiciding cow's and killers is not a legitimate strategy, it's obvious what you intended and sadly the mods allowed you to succeed.
    Besides, you're the ones who provoked AMA to hit into your war by suiciding your cows 5 mins prior to warstart and AFTER you started trading hits with swea, your goals and intentions where painfully obvious, I don't mind you punishing AMA but I do mind cheating and not taking harsh actions to discourage cheating

    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    Its not possible to reset provs to an arbitrary date :/ Apart from that, we wouldnt reset sweas acres.
    Well if you can reset acres to an arbitrary size it's fairly easy to figure out what that size was since they were in war for less than 48h it would all still show up in news.
    And why not? resetting swea's acres would not be a punishment to swea, it would just be returning things to their original state before fakewar occurred, it's also the only way to discourage people from cheating in a similar manner again since acres and thus suspension is obviously not something you care about if you're already hell bent on farming out.
    By not reacting harshly enough you encourage others to cheat in a similar manner because 48h of suspension is not much of a punishment unless perhaps if the entire server is told ingame that you are in suspension and thus basically free acres, suspension should also suspend any gangbang protection.

    Quote Originally Posted by ZodZilla View Post
    To be fair, I doubt it was your call directly ... but you must understand why AMA players would be naturally indignant here.
    AMA players seems to become indignant if you as much as fart in their general direction, it's not something that seems to be hard to accomplish.
    Last edited by Elldallan; 03-10-2013 at 09:42.

  12. #252
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    And why not?
    Because its ridiculously abusable.

    Quote Originally Posted by Elldallan View Post
    perhaps if the entire server is told ingame that you are in suspension and thus basically free acres, suspension should also suspend any gangbang protection.
    We do not give account specific details to other people. What you propose is just silly.
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |
    PM DavidC for test server access

  13. #253
    Post Fiend
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    What you propose is just silly.
    This may be true, but is it any 'sillier' than what actually went down?

  14. #254
    Game Support Bishop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    21,332
    Quote Originally Posted by ZodZilla View Post
    This may be true, but is it any 'sillier' than what actually went down?
    Yes?
    Support email: utopiasupport@utopia-game.com <- please use this and don't just PM me| Account Deleted/Inactive | Utopia Facebook Page |
    PM DavidC for test server access

  15. #255
    Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    304
    Quote Originally Posted by Bishop View Post
    Yes?
    If Bishop does not have any children, I now understand why...........

    Official Resident Troll of cRAZiEs

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •