SWEA Vs Crownless AMA

[American Badass]

AMA is not pewpew, we dont delete. And way to take what I said specifically to gerbn00b out of context and apply it to people when not applicable. It's ok your n00b though, you wouldn't understand.

How is that taken out of context? What you said is core players do not matter and it is all down to leadership. I bet you say the most important player in the kingdom is the bank as well? Do you ever consider that without the core, the cow would not have grown? True most players can play core but what you said is totally disrespectful to the kd.

Also You not being in AMA leadership, if you crown, I take this will not count as +1 crown to Proteus then? If you are in leadership and crown it will be all done to you/elit and no player in AMA can brag that they crowned?

A dime in a dozen you say, still I have more crowns than you... What does that say? People actually like me, and you? Ask any kingdom ive played in the last 40 ages, who wouldnt want me back, and you? Who wants Proteus in their kingdom? :) Elit beware of this nub, he be hunting for that crown glory..

Gergnub 1 - 0 Proteus

[Korp]

I wasnt really trying to join dreams i like how easily I was able to convince you, I was just getting roster info to arrange gb that age. Hoh has only won crowns in ages they never had to fight anyone and charted poorly in ages they had to actually fight strong opponents yet rage beat the kingdoms they lost to.

You aren't a leader you are a trollfag that i don't respect. Youve accomplished nothing gtfo.



Crowns where you aren't part of leadership team when you win don't count to me. Those kingdoms could have won with any other player there instead of you, players like you are a dime a dozen, you bring nothing to the table except forum activity.

Its interesting how you talk about people arent leaders, if look at the charts and Rage during your "surpreme" rule Rage have won only 1 crown. Amongst those ages you lost against kingdoms like BIO who you only claim to be are farms.

[Syntico]

This crown business is getting out of hand. I apologise for the madness that I created.. it was only meant for fun and for my own kingdom's enjoyment.

[Syntico]

Its interesting how you talk about people arent leaders, if look at the charts and Rage during your "surpreme" rule Rage have won only 1 crown. Amongst those ages you lost against kingdoms like BIO who you only claim to be are farms.

Leading is not only about winning it all though.

[Korp]

Leading is not only about winning it all though.

If you're a whoring kd and you dont win, that should mean you're a failure? Especially if you claim to be a good one.

[SillyRabbit]

No, correct. First, we told you we were hostile no matter what. Clearly. You knew we were coming. We came. You made the bet we would not hit into war. We made the bet you would not dare to have us hitting into your war. Both sides lost their respective bets. We, however, came out on top (<3 hedging).

Second, you had days to put yourself in a position where you chose your war partner. Instead, you came out in fort hoping that you could dodge one by being waved by the other. As noted above, you lost that bet.

Third, I made it clear that we would get Pew off your back if you provided us with the button. I went as far as to say that we would press it immediately should not Pew desire war. At that time, you were no longer interested to war us; possibly, you had already at this point arranged a win-win war with Pew were you could grow your cow.

Fourth, by allowing Pew to wave you put yourself in 2vs1; as far as we were concerned, we were already hostile. You knew that.

Fifth, no, we were not scared, we simply wanted to take as much of your land as we could. Waving you into fort did not align with this goal; hitting into your war was deemed more profitable.

It's hilarious that you spend so much time justifying your kingdoms lame and bs actions. Yes, we know you were being opportunistic and taking the route of least risk (waving us while we were at war with someone else). The point is that SWEA is a garbage kd and can't win a fair war on their own. Even against a ghetto bashing dealbreaking kd like mine. You shouldn't feel proud of your accomplishments.

[gergnub]

This crown business is getting out of hand. I apologise for the madness that I created.. it was only meant for fun and for my own kingdom's enjoyment.

Aint' that the truth :)

[Korp]

It's hilarious that you spend so much time justifying your kingdoms lame and bs actions. Yes, we know you were being opportunistic and taking the route of least risk (waving us while we were at war with someone else). The point is that SWEA is a garbage kd and can't win a fair war on their own. Even against a ghetto bashing dealbreaking kd like mine. You shouldn't feel proud of your accomplishments.

And you cant win against garbages kds like SWEA withtout them giving you the button. What does that tell you about your kingdom then? And against "good" kds you obviously think to even have a remote shot you have to dealbreak them. Oh and win "WW crown" you have to cheat.

[JustinSane]

It's hilarious that you spend so much time justifying your kingdoms lame and bs actions. Yes, we know you were being opportunistic and taking the route of least risk (waving us while we were at war with someone else). The point is that SWEA is a garbage kd and can't win a fair war on their own. Even against a ghetto bashing dealbreaking kd like mine. You shouldn't feel proud of your accomplishments.

Oh. You got me all wrong. I have no need or desire to justify my/our actions. I am simply in the business of clarification. That said, we won against Rage on our own and we would've won fairly straight-forward against you. But like already stated: We weren't going for the WW chart, we wanted land. We weren't afraid of giving you the button, we simply saw it as sub-optimal play given our end (which it was). Why should we not play our cards to our favour? I don't get it.

[Proteus]

Its interesting how you talk about people arent leaders, if look at the charts and Rage during your "surpreme" rule Rage have won only 1 crown. Amongst those ages you lost against kingdoms like BIO who you only claim to be are farms.

Really hard for me to respond to people i just finished farming a couple of weeks ago, take your defiled carcass elsewhere. And we never lost to bio, we beat them in war the age they won eoa as they farmed hoh after losing our fight.

[KuhaN]

sn0re.

[gergnub]

Proteus, why you be so hated by your peers? I know in your eyes my crowns are nothing, but still.. A kingdom has 25 players, but Proteus is the one to rule them all? This logic makes no sense to me or to 99% of the people playing this game. So ask again, Proteus, why are you so hated by your peers? (and yes, please do look at my earlier reply, people actually want to play with me, but you.. your megalomania.. some how it just goes against you.. i wonder why :)

[goodz]

And you cant win against garbages kds like SWEA withtout them giving you the button. What does that tell you about your kingdom then? And against "good" kds you obviously think to even have a remote shot you have to dealbreak them. Oh and win "WW crown" you have to cheat.

Didnt elit beat swea? Proteus is just core doesn't count as him winning!

[goodz]

Also lol. AMA's biggest issue is public image? Proteus is helping fix it quick tho!

[Elit]

Also lol. AMA's biggest issue is public image? Proteus is helping fix it quick tho!

Its why we got Proteus :)

Didnt elit beat swea? Proteus is just core doesn't count as him winning!

During war with SWEA i was busy rl and not able to lead kd. Proteus did very good job in lead kd and win war. I was surprised he did it this good :P
All kd was very active during war and good team work.

This crown business is getting out of hand. I apologise for the madness that I created.. it was only meant for fun and for my own kingdom's enjoyment.

Yes its all your fault. People become crazy for noting and surfer alot past ages!