"facts"
"facts"
So clever flogger to put quotes around a word after you've repeatedly been caught in lies.
When did I lie?
You realize the entire point of me posting our evidence in steps was to catch you in about 5 different steps of lies before we acted, right? You simply never admit to anything unless I have a screenshot of an in-game message proving to the contrary. You've already denied everything at every step of the way until I produce more evidence. There's a reason I made sure you went back and looked at your logs before we even spoke.
"My entire motivation behind creating this clusterbleep was to enact some complicated plan to trap ASF and catch him being dishonest."
Again, man to man issue becomes realmwide calamity. Assassinating the target with a nuke when a bullet would have sufficed. Sorry Flogger, I really do prefer to remain impartial, but you're not helping your cause when you describe your motivation this way.
It wouldn't have been a complicated trap if at any point in the period of a week someone over there just manned up insteada covering up.
Just goes to show, never base the content of a trap on the expected actions of the victim.
My point is, AGAIN, that you never actually present facts, just your opinion and conclusory statements which you proffer as FACT. You do not have facts, you have opinions.
As I outlined to you there are multiple levels of damages here. Lets tally them up shall we? There is the land, which I believe was 750 acres. During the time that BB was without it they lost not only the value of the land but the value of its production. 750*25*24 (lets assume it was only 24 ticks they were without it, it may be more or less, I don't know the exact number.)*2.75 = 1237500 gc (not including banks/science/bonuses). Lets assume they were running 30% guilds so they lost out on 30*7.5 or 225 guilds or 225*.02*24 = 108 wizards behind schedule. Now these were cow acres, so that also casued a delay in exploration. so 24 hrs longer to amass the gc for exploration * their explore costs * the acres to be explored * all the effects above.Bour offered all land back plus extra free land from the time he first razed. This was before any pump was interrupted and before any real damage had been done. This is a FACT. Why do you try so hard to lie about it?
Then we add on the KD wide costs of having to convert from pump builds 25provicnes*60% of land*1K/landgc*total land apply to wizards, gold, etc etc etc,
Then we add on the costs of late diplomacy causing futher disruption to the flow of resources etc.
So let me be clear again. Bour did not offer ANYTHING NEAR the damage he caused. I have not even gotten into deterrence or punitive damages. So do not spout BS about full and fair reparations. You all offered nothing relative to the total cost and disruption caused by your conspiracy. YES IT WAS a conspiracy, look at the logs where your leadership in channel with bour discuss precisely what was to happen before it actually happened. THAT is a conspiracy. The fact that it happened almost precisely as described is prima facia evidence that the conspiracy was carried out. Again I refer you to the wiki on inchoate crimes and the defenses available for inchoate crimes. Note again that you fail to meet the threshold criteria for any of the defenses to an inchoate crime.
"having fun warring when you have whoring and number 1 as a goal is totally pointless..." - Korp
"while I heart shiester when we both play serious and are in the same kingdom, I hate shiester on the forums and pretty much disagree with everything he says. Even he knows this." - Flogger asking me out on a date
The devs have made a decision to kill competitive utopia and have thereby killed my interest with it.
Erhm, our formal CF with them expired more than a week before you noticed em.
Get it now?
Fwiw, this whole Bour woukd fake hostile us would just end in Dorje waving us anyway. You'd tell us "bour has a small kd not in range, hostile is not legit!"
We would be in a worse position than if no razes happened. Is this really so hard to understand?
Because you are so ****ing braindead that you thought (and still think) that this was about land. NEWSFLASH: it wasn't. We had EVERY intention to just razekill that ghetto up until we found out this was Emeriti doing it.
Ill repeat it again because this is the only thing you use to try and get people to help you: Beastblood does not do this because they want to crown unlike ASF keeps telling people. Anyone believing his crap can see for himself at eoa that I speak the truth.
That's the point: they claim they did it because bour would get farmed. Fact is, nothing indicated we were going for bour
The razes started a few hours after Emeriti and BB didnt manage to make a CF deal. Like duh, why CF sages for 9 weeks?
One would wonder how a 2k acre province would be a threat to a what, 3k acre province? The 2k untrained, fresh explored and not even full pop, no resources? To a 3k dude with like what, 25k troops? Dont remember the exact numbers on troops /land.
The threat part is just a coverup to disguise the real reasons.
A diplomatic solution was offered and refused. Another ne has been offered and refused. Is that not the definition of Diplomacy failing? And yes If Emeriti pulled out of the age this would have never happened. If they stopped thinking that getting the land back outside of the EOWCF is equal to having that land and it not being razed and not having to convert early and adjust the time line then yes i think this would never be an issue. To continue thinking the land taken was not a huge deal when it forces a shift of how BB had to draft and stock and forced their hand into a the CF deal in the first place. I think you need to stop being blind to it and realize that the implanted idea is what caused this and was all on Emeriti. The fact you chose to stay in the race is on you and failing diplomacy to end it and lead the GB.
You do not have to agree with the situation or feel you had to sit out but to say they didnt offer a diplomatic solution is just stupid
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)