Quote Originally Posted by tetley View Post
Maybe this is just a semantics thing but, to me, arguing "against saying that Emeriti is getting gangbanged because of their actions this age" suggests that the point you are trying to make is that it had nothing to do with this age. Now if you had included the word "only" as in "saying that Emeriti is getting gangbanged ONLY because of their actions this age" then there would be no confusion.
Sorry, I don't treat the utopia forums like a police interrogation. I come in, say what I'm thinking and move on. I'll be sure to have my lawyers draw up some papers before my next post to make sure you don't haphazardly assume with 97% certainty what I mean.

Quote Originally Posted by bombdigie View Post
Proven? Where was their proof? The only proof they offered was "coincidence".
The proof was your inability to provide proof. You provided a screenshot of a text conversation with some unnamed contact. If you're going to make accusations the burden of proof lies with you. Without any actual reason to believe you while you drone on and on for pages about how they're cheaters all you're doing is yelling fire in a movie theater and insisting to the police that they can't prove there wasn't a small fire. You're still going to jail.

For instance:
Flogger x-logs for all of BB.

Go ahead and prove me wrong.