The U (#4) v/s Settlers (#5)

**Elldallan** · 03-10-2015, 07:03

Originally Posted by jdorje

Finally, for the last time, I had nothing to do with the the practice of double-teaming a kingdom by offering in-game ceasefire. Go do research before you completely change history. The time we waved BB this age was a few hours after they did a few hits on a kingdom we were already hitting...should we have kept hitting that kingdom and double-teamed them? The time we waved CP they agreed to war us, but calle didn't want that war so he suicided into ED to try to get a dodge war...after CP spent all day not-very-active in diplomacy, we waved them on the hour they had asked us to wave them and gave them a long ceasefire for a single ~4800 acre wave.

So you as bigwig in Sanct had nothing to do with you and Havoc doubleteaming AMA... I find that hard to believe...

**Elldallan** · 03-10-2015, 07:14

Originally Posted by Persain

which would of been fine if the cf went up? but when settlers starting hitting back doesnt that kind of retroactively make it an extended hostile?

Nope, AMA/Sanct/Havoc situation entailed AMA warring Sanct, AMA winning. Havoc telling they would notice, AMA coming out of eowcf, Sanct stealing AMA cow, Havoc noticing, AMA claiming non legit notice because fellow Abs Ally Sanct clearly just restarted conflict, AMA waves Sanct, Sanct retalwars for several days. Sanct stops hits for 12hrs, claims that means no hostile, Havoc waves AMA. So cf going up is at no point required according to precedents made

**protector** · 03-10-2015, 07:19

Originally Posted by Mithras

And no, you do not get to dictate who we fight and when. We have a 1 on 1 fight with settlers that you broke our agreement and noticed into.

Yet you wave others into hostile and therefor take part in dictating who they can fight. Double standards, yet again.

Just like how you guys are mad we have 'farmed out' land to CR which was aprox the same you got from waving into hostile :)

**protector** · 03-10-2015, 07:34

Originally Posted by Palem

I don't understand why BB isn't in here explaining why it's lame that CR isn't offering to CF Emeriti for free...

Wait what? Why would anyone CF Emeriti for free, ever, considering they refuse to do it themselves?
They didn't give me one (were all others did). Not only that, they also waved me 4h after I started a hostile wave.

ps i'm in a ghetto. Ghetto powa :D

**bombdigie** · 03-10-2015, 08:10

Originally Posted by protector

Wait what? Why would anyone CF Emeriti for free, ever, considering they refuse to do it themselves?
They didn't give me one (were all others did). Not only that, they also waved me 4h after I started a hostile wave.

ps i'm in a ghetto. Ghetto powa :D

Exactly... hes choosing sides and going full blown denial mode.

**DM_Benjamin** · 03-10-2015, 09:24

Originally Posted by bombdigie

Exactly... hes choosing sides and going full blown denial mode.

He is entitled to voice his opinion on the varying Utopian subjects, his moderation of these forums is unbiased and pretty consistent in my opinion.

At least he is active.

**Mithras** · 03-10-2015, 12:55

Originally Posted by vir

ps. zauper a small advice is to just ignore mithras he have no intention of ever see reason his whole function in discussions is to try to piss you off which apparently serve some kind of function since they still let him talk for the kd. I doubt the intention is to get people to like their kd more though.. but im probably just not smart enough to comprehend the advance pr/diplo tactic that he is using.

Since we are talking about me I could take an opportunity to clarify some clear misconceptions. When confronted with reason I will see reason every time. When confronted with bull**** and forum circus I will call you on it, every single time. If you find that I never see reason, that is for a reason...

**protector** · 03-10-2015, 13:18

Originally Posted by Mithras

Since we are talking about me I could take an opportunity to clarify some clear misconceptions. When confronted with reason I will see reason every time. When confronted with bull**** and forum circus I will call you on it, every single time. If you find that I never see reason, that is for a reason...

Nah you don't. At least you didn't want to see it when I messaged you.

**Band of Horses** · 03-10-2015, 14:24

Originally Posted by DM_Benjamin

He is entitled to voice his opinion on the varying Utopian subjects, his moderation of these forums is unbiased and pretty consistent in my opinion.

At least he is active.

Your opinion is shared. #ProPalem

Originally Posted by protector

Nah you don't. At least you didn't want to see it when I messaged you.

I didn't know I was color blind until I was 15, so I can understand why Mithras thinks he can see when he can't.

**Palem** · 03-10-2015, 15:24

Originally Posted by protector

Wait what? Why would anyone CF Emeriti for free, ever, considering they refuse to do it themselves?
They didn't give me one (were all others did). Not only that, they also waved me 4h after I started a hostile wave.

ps i'm in a ghetto. Ghetto powa :D

Because if I've learned anything from these forums in the past 2 ages, it's that if you're not willing to CF for free, then you're an evil collection of people with no hearts and souls that deserve absolutely no respect from anyone for any reason. CR is refusing to CF for free...*shrugs*

Also, you're not a in a ghetto. Being in the top 3 disqualifies you from ghetto-hood.

**SnirpsneR** · 03-10-2015, 16:32

Originally Posted by Palem

Because if I've learned anything from these forums in the past 2 ages, it's that if you're not willing to CF for free, then you're an evil collection of people with no hearts and souls that deserve absolutely no respect from anyone for any reason. CR is refusing to CF for free...*shrugs*

Also, you're not a in a ghetto. Being in the top 3 disqualifies you from ghetto-hood.

That last line is dumb.

**Palem** · 03-10-2015, 16:41

It's not. We simply have different definitions of what a ghetto is.

You're 3/3 in wars. You are #3 in land/nw. You have 3 of the top 5 land provs in the game. You have good players and good leaders.

There's not a ghetto thing about your kingdom.

**Korp** · 03-10-2015, 16:43

The assumption that just cause you are top 3 you arent a ghetto is dumb. While you further explained your opinion in post 2 doesnt make your first statement less dumb.

**Palem** · 03-10-2015, 16:47

My 1st statement is not dumb. It's year 4. The only way you're going to be in the top 3 is if you have quality players and leaders that can navigate top diplo. Otherwise you'd have been farmed because you can't defend yourself. If you CAN defend yourself from the top kingdoms farming you, then you're hardly a ghetto.

You can't have a collection of generally bad players, with poor leadership and just happen to find yourself at the top of the charts. That's not a thing that just happens, at least not this late in the age.

**Korp** · 03-10-2015, 17:07

Originally Posted by Palem

My 1st statement is not dumb. It's year 4. The only way you're going to be in the top 3 is if you have quality players and leaders that can navigate top diplo. Otherwise you'd have been farmed because you can't defend yourself. If you CAN defend yourself from the top kingdoms farming you, then you're hardly a ghetto.

You can't have a collection of generally bad players, with poor leadership and just happen to find yourself at the top of the charts. That's not a thing that just happens, at least not this late in the age.

But that wasnt in your first initial statement, you didnt specify it anyway. You just claimed top 3 is not ghetto with no further details. Just cause you add stuff now doesnt make your initial statement less dumb.

Thread: The U (#4) v/s Settlers (#5)

Thread Tools

Display

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions