Canadian Rebellion VS Pandas

[TheOne]

I learnt a new uto descriptive phrase today. It's called 'clown fiesta'

On a side note yay to #IronOreVolatility #kaching

[Band of Horses]

I learnt a new uto descriptive phrase today. It's called 'clown fiesta'

On a side note yay to #IronOreVolatility #kaching

It is a common gaming term currently in the meme culture that we live in.

[Godly]

I've setup a list of clowns in the clown fiesta. The details are currently classified but I will release them once conflict is over.

[JohnnyReid]

Update on the conflict?

[Meep]

Update on the conflict?

[Band of Horses]

I've setup a list of clowns in the clown fiesta. The details are currently classified but I will release them once conflict is over.

This will be amazing, I am grinning with anticipation.

[DM_Benjamin]

[12:15] <@Benjamin> i really hope by having my number wrong in the bot and missing a hit, that i make godlys clown fiesta list eow
[12:15] <@Benjamin> it would be a travesty otherwise
[12:15] <@eragon> you missed a hit?
[12:15] <@Benjamin> yah the fvery first one
[12:15] <@Benjamin> very
[12:15] <@Benjamin> i had my number wrong in the bot so when i was called it didnt work
[12:15] <@eragon> yeah think that auto puts you on the list ;p

[Band of Horses]

With some people in your kd I find this gif to be fitting

[era]

<munkbot> | own_tm:34428 (77) | own_raze:4087 (8) | enemy_tm:28284 (66) | enemy_cf_withdrawn:0 (1) | enemy_cf_proposal:0 (1) | enemy_cf_broken:0 (1) | 6144 total
<munkbot> Meter with Pandas should be 148 | 115

Potentially maxing meter sometime tomorrow and finally get into this war!

[flogger]

So I've seen this posted a few times, but whats the idea behind drafting to a -ppa value? Is it simply to kill hostile dragons, or is it something else? It seems kind of dumb to draft that deep to me.

simple. I did it once and people gotta copy meh

[flogger]

And I still think the meter thing is not a solution. Ghettos and ghetto players don't want to waste their time fighting at max activity for days with literally nothing to gain. Even with more meter room, it still requires better activity than all but a few warring KDs have to actually hostile well against someone that much bigger than you.

Back when there was no meter cap the threat of people hostling you forever was very real. Pretty much no one waved the sleepys of the world or if Rage ever got small ASF would tie you up for a month, etc. I picked 300 as a number because equal sized kingdoms would still get there, but if you pick on someone too much smaller, they can tie you up.

[Meep]

Back when there was no meter cap the threat of people hostling you forever was very real. Pretty much no one waved the sleepys of the world or if Rage ever got small ASF would tie you up for a month, etc. I picked 300 as a number because equal sized kingdoms would still get there, but if you pick on someone too much smaller, they can tie you up.

I think there has to be a more creative way to do it than a fixed meter system.

I'm not sure what that way is, but I see the meter and it just doesn't convince me that I shouldn't bully smaller KDs, even at 300.

--

Here's something that I think would be very powerful in this area. "Fix" (I say fix because I'm not sure it's a bug) KDNW gains modifier as it relates to hostiles.

If you are in a mutual hostile, the KDNW gains modifier is erased entirely, and you get the +10% hostile gains on top of that.

So if you are bullying a much smaller KD, you are getting 66% gains.

If that KD decides to fight back and defend themselves, and hits you 8 times or more, you now are getting 110% gains.

7.92% base gains to 13.2% base gains.

That 8th attack from the ghetto gives the whoring KD an immediate and astounding +66% gains

I find this absurd, and I think that removing that would help ghettos disincentivise bullying tremendously.

[Aranfein]

Only thing that would work is base gains on acre size rather then NW, it will eliminate bottomfeeding by a large margin and it'll prevent all the mess that is currently happening + it will be fair to both the top and the bottom.

Still give same gains but based on acres (is what i meant).

Not a bad idea either Meep though i can see exploits in that, 66% gains shouldnt be the bottom cap in gains, if you bully someone and they dont respond with anything other then OPs, the gains should drop gradually so it can not continue, until it reaches around the 25% mark perhaps?.

[Meep]

Only thing that would work is base gains on acre size rather then NW, it will eliminate bottomfeeding by a large margin and it'll prevent all the mess that is currently happening + it will be fair to both the top and the bottom.

Still give same gains but based on acres (is what i meant).

Not a bad idea either Meep though i can see exploits in that, 66% gains shouldnt be the bottom cap in gains, if you bully someone and they dont respond with anything other then OPs, the gains should drop gradually so it can not continue, until it reaches around the 25% mark perhaps?.

If you bully and they don't respond at all, then you already lose further gains due to Province NW and meter throttling.

Since they aren't responding, their nw is falling faster so Province NW gains modifier goes up, and since they aren't responding, the hostile meter gap goes up.

[Aranfein]

yea but you havent taken into account that they might send army out on a side KD rather then get farmed army home, should that count as them responding and further keep gains high for the bully? i think that would be unfair.

Again the NW gains just need to be swapped to acre size and these things wouldnt be a problem, i cant see how a KD would be able to exploit it unless they intra.