To all those who are turning this scenario into a BOTTOM FEEDING thing in defense of someone HITTING INTO A WAR, I say this.
You all are against bottom feeding. So please remove the concept of hitting into province NW range. Make the attacks dependent on KD networth. If I can hit any guy within 85-120% of me, I can hit a KD small or large. Same goes for a smaller KD. And this wont be called Bottom feeding or Top Pesting.
You say hitting into a war is something frowned upon, but is okay in this case coz we are the bigger KD. I also know no one can help it as a human mind is hardwired to go for the underdogs. Since we are larger and they are small, its okay, despite the fact that we made the umpteenth attempt to solve this thing. So, hitting into wars is fine as long as you are a smaller KD.
Someone said its fine as long as its not a 2vs1 thing. If nothing is said in rules about anything, why the hell is that unfair? I know, this happened with us in this case, but I still say, if anything thats not in rules is fair, then this is okay.
Also, deal breaking is fairplay then. Why then the whole debate about how unfair things were for KD X when Y deal broke on their CF. Hell, I can break a deal amidst someone else's WAR and attach them if I have a beef against them.
But all this is frowned upon, because sometimes there are rules which not need be stated to be followed, just to make the game more enjoyable for all. Frankly, had I been in that guy's spot, I may have retaliated the same way, but ended up accepting the proposal when I get things evened up, coz obviously I do not have an ego bloated enough to spoil 3 months of gameplay just for revenge. He did it, we tried reconciliation, even to the extent of stopping hits while they continued Spell cover and ops on us (and still wont accept CF). But when things cross a threshold, I guess action needs to be taken.
Thank you all for your insight. I see the game better now.