All I am reading is my D'cks bigger....... No my D'cks bigger...... seriously I thought I was playing a WAR game......
All I am reading is my D'cks bigger....... No my D'cks bigger...... seriously I thought I was playing a WAR game......
The fact of the matter is that you took it upon yourself to raze somebody in our kingdom during an active hostile.
Now we are going to raze you, whenever that opportunity arises.
I don't know how the concept of double hostile has escaped such a seasoned and famous kingdom as yours.
I don't consider an extended conflict witha kingdom more than twice your size to be an "active hostile". Were you preparing for a real war I would consider it so.
Fact of the matter is that you invited someone who brought a large amount of baggage with him. You want someone to blame, look in the mirror.
One accuses another of razing into war, yet the other accuses it of razing into hostile. Hmmm..
Care to post the message you sent in response to my diplo on that? Cause you never sent that. good try though.
When I Co-Led monument, Mercy of Absalom who was 17M NW waved us when we were 10M NW, WE hostiled them for three weeks to get their cow under control and were 8M NW at declare time and we had to hit into them 19 times to get into NW range so we could declare war. We warred them for an additional three weeks and eventually won the war.
WHO THE HELL ARE YOU TO SAY WHAT IS AND IS NOT A HOSTILE BASED ON NW?!??!? YOU KNOW NOTHING! You are so ignorant it makes my teeth hurt.
Last edited by Sheister; 24-09-2016 at 19:50.
"having fun warring when you have whoring and number 1 as a goal is totally pointless..." - Korp
"while I heart shiester when we both play serious and are in the same kingdom, I hate shiester on the forums and pretty much disagree with everything he says. Even he knows this." - Flogger asking me out on a date
The devs have made a decision to kill competitive utopia and have thereby killed my interest with it.
dropping 3 provs you went from 18 to 15 and the nback up to 16 with your new random. Maths really isn't your strong point Korp maybe stay away from the numbers for now.
Fact is you say it's fine for Sheister to wait for us to go into war and raze into us, but it's the crime of the century for us to raze him when he's just jumped into a kingdom in conflict. So you're saying we should have waited for you guys to go to war and razed him then? That would have been acceptable to you would it?
At the risk of going full Korp.
This is one of the most convoluted pieces of logic I have ever seen.
So if a kd retals against someone twice their nw they're not hostile and you are free to hit in because Sheisters plays there?
F*ck me.
I don't care about any of this sh*t mainly but I wanna raze you for saying something like that :]
Claiming a 50% nw kd isn't hostile because the larger one is oor and that they should be responsible for previous kd action of their peons. :(
Sad tiems
There are several differences. Not the least of which is my problem was with your entire kingdom. I took an action against the kingdom. You interfered against a kingdom for the actions of one province. Hitting into a conflict is an action against a Kingdom. You did it. You are wrong. You have always been wrong. You just are too ignorant to see it.
"having fun warring when you have whoring and number 1 as a goal is totally pointless..." - Korp
"while I heart shiester when we both play serious and are in the same kingdom, I hate shiester on the forums and pretty much disagree with everything he says. Even he knows this." - Flogger asking me out on a date
The devs have made a decision to kill competitive utopia and have thereby killed my interest with it.
Double Hostile is generally accepted to refer to a second kingdom attacking in when pre-war hostilities with a first kingdom.
In fact, when I commented on this to Korp, he responded by saying "I deliberately didn't say we were in hostile, I said it was a conflict", thereby accepting that the situation with (x:x) was not what would normally be considered a "hostile" in the traditional sense of the game mechanics.
I accept they were in an extended conflict with the other kingdom (which we did not know about at the time we hit sheister), but the term "double hostile" has a very specific meaning in this game and is clearly NOT the case.
I dont know if the origin of the issue being strangely similiar matters much, sounds like both sides are trying to put each down even though they know the other would not yield.
No. we interfered with YOU not the whole kingdom. We didn't know your mates were in conflict and truth be told we probably wouldn't have cared much if we did know. We came after you for your actions. Nobody else was touched until the threats started flying from Korp and Bishop.
Razing into a war is an action against a kingdom too. It didn't stop you so why should it stop us you little hypocrite?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)