Quote Originally Posted by natebane View Post
If it was all about what you see on television, then Hillary should have won hands down. Her total general election ad spending was $211million to his $74million while outside groups supporting either candidate spent in the same ratio. It was a complete propaganda machine on Hillary's part if you take into account publications like the New York Times saying Donald didn't deserve fair treatment in reporting; however, despite the massive bias against Donald it was hard to hide her corruption.
You're missing the point. Trump thrives on television, Clinton does not. And what exactly was biased against Trump? He lied 75% of the time, reporting those lies is not biased. And what is corrupt about Clinton other than you hearing Trump call her "Crooked Hillary" 10,000 times on TV? Trump, who uses charity funds for his own personal use, calling someone else crooked is beyond hilarious.