-wSk- vs CR

[citadela01]

How could top possibly police sparta, they allrdy said they would do something about cr's hit into war but cf restricts them.

Surely they are cfed with sparta as well

[home.alone]

How could top possibly police sparta, they allrdy said they would do something about cr's hit into war but cf restricts them.

Surely they are cfed with sparta as well

From my sources into one of those kd's, A deal was made between CR & Sparta that Sparta breaks the CF and hits CR so as to show to the community that there is someone to Police CR & also take some heat off them!

The way children's behave these days just makes me think..

[JusticeLeague]

Am I right on this?
-CR hit into WSK war which supposedly not accepted by the community
-So only Spartan started to hit CR to police it
-However Spartan had broken an existing CF to do it
-The top which I believe is Emeriti, BB and CR police Spartan in return
-End result is Spartan need to return the acres

So question is why the top aren't policing CR at the first place and chose to police Spartans?
Secondly, is it Spartan's hit that result in the stop of CR hitting into WSK war and CR even need to return WSK 20k acres for the razes they had done.

Seems odd. Like someone is orchestrating

[JusticeLeague]

Can I conclude hitting into other people war is accepted by the top and breaking a CF deal is not accepted?

[StratOcastle]

Can I conclude hitting into other people war is accepted by the top and breaking a CF deal is not accepted?

Onthesurface. ~ Sparing you hashtags since 1967 ~ yes.

The Conspiracy Theory aspect of home.alone would have Sparta breaking CF and trading acres for Public Relations.
the because: Because we have the emergence of both new alliance(s?) and Sparta disband in the pipe. A further notion I would surmise would be CR guerilla forces since they aren't playing next age.

This may all seem like I see the top as evil, but it's quite the contrary. More like business is business and business is fun.

[protector]

I think I am sick and tired of seeing these complicated CF deals. We need to bring it back a notch, scale back the terms and, importance of terminology in said cfs, then the game will open up a lot more.

Can't be too hard to for the devs to add a date to the CF page so that dealbreaks can no longer happen!

Reading some of the CF terms made up nowadays makes me think we're making legal contracts for renting/buying a house or w/e lmao.

[protector]

Now I get this even less, wasn't your age goal stopping an Emeriti 3peat as it devalues CR's own?

Does it even matter? Neither CR's nor Emeriti's comes anywhere close to what it used to mean.
The lack of competition makes even a regular age win fairly meaningless. That was for me a reason to stop bothering and go slackmode.
Other reasons were stuff like cJ's beggarmode4acres and the increasingly stupid CF deals. I mean, is it really needed for one kingdom to decide what the kingdom they CF with can and can't do? Why does X decide that if A gives acres to B, A also needs to give X acres but give them first? It's completely stupid and retarded. If you take a fair portion of someones land, you shouldn't be a greedy f*** and demand more if they end up needing to give another kingdom a similar portion because fighting them is dumb.

[StratOcastle]

Sounds like a Monty Python sketch or...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v77SF4TFUoM

I'm curious about a rematch through the clutter; CR vs Wsk.

[ThePuncher]

Does it even matter? Neither CR's nor Emeriti's comes anywhere close to what it used to mean.
The lack of competition makes even a regular age win fairly meaningless. That was for me a reason to stop bothering and go slackmode.
Other reasons were stuff like cJ's beggarmode4acres and the increasingly stupid CF deals. I mean, is it really needed for one kingdom to decide what the kingdom they CF with can and can't do? Why does X decide that if A gives acres to B, A also needs to give X acres but give them first? It's completely stupid and retarded. If you take a fair portion of someones land, you shouldn't be a greedy f*** and demand more if they end up needing to give another kingdom a similar portion because fighting them is dumb.

MOST sensible comment I've read all age :)

[protector]

meep & cRs:

[protector]

It really sounds like a language barrier... just told u that tactical withdrew is not the same as losing a war - and we have many examples for this. If u want i can do a draw for u in paint... to skip the english language barrier

It's (f)actually a loss. Most (if not all?) examples of a WD being a "tactical victory" go back to the time were a WW bonus wasn't implemented yet. Back then you could WD up acres and go for the b2b win. Nowadays with the WW bonus it is very difficult.

[JusticeLeague]

Can't be too hard to for the devs to add a date to the CF page so that dealbreaks can no longer happen!

Reading some of the CF terms made up nowadays makes me think we're making legal contracts for renting/buying a house or w/e lmao.

Wow that would be interesting. I mean cf will come with date and countdown timer. Once offered, another party accept, there is no way the cf can be cancelled. That would solve a lot of bs going on...

[Poopsie]

Can I conclude hitting into other people war is accepted by the top and breaking a CF deal is not accepted?

If your kingdom did that raze into other kingdoms war...for sure top kingdoms will police you

[wingding]

maybe the good 'ol boy's club should get together and say all cf's are worth x% land, then you can kinda norm stuff out a little to encourage a little less BS...or just tournament style it on yrx AvB, CvD, EvF @xx acres, round robin it maybe? dunno, im' sure you can make it competitive if ppl wanted it to be

[JusticeLeague]

If your kingdom did that raze into other kingdoms war...for sure top kingdoms will police you

You mean the system is biased. It depends on which kingdom did it? I think CR did numerous raze before they stopped( more than one wave for sure)
Did Spartan at least complete a wave before got stopped by polices?